Integrative model-based comparison of target site-specific antimicrobial effects: A case study with ceftaroline and lefamulin.

OBJECTIVE: Predictions of antimicrobial effects typically rely on plasma-based pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) targets, ignoring target-site concentrations and potential differences in tissue penetration between antibiotics. In this study, we applied PK-PD modelling to compare target site-specific effects of antibiotics by integrating clinical microdialysis data, in vitro time-kill curves, and antimicrobial susceptibility distributions. As a case study, we compared the effect of lefamulin and ceftaroline against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) at soft-tissue concentrations. METHODS: A population PK model describing lefamulin concentrations in plasma, subcutaneous adipose and muscle tissue was developed. For ceftaroline, a similar previously reported PK model was adopted. In vitro time-kill experiments were performed with six MRSA isolates and a PD model was developed to describe bacterial growth and antimicrobial effects. The clinical PK and in vitro PD models were linked to compare antimicrobial effects of ceftaroline and lefamulin at the different target sites. RESULTS: Considering minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distributions and standard dosages, ceftaroline showed superior anti-MRSA effects compared to lefamulin both at plasma and soft-tissue concentrations. Looking at the individual antibiotics, lefamulin effects were highest at soft-tissue concentrations, while ceftaroline effects were highest at plasma concentrations, emphasising the importance of considering target-site PK-PD in antibiotic treatment optimisation. CONCLUSION: Given standard dosing regimens, ceftaroline appeared more effective than lefamulin against MRSA at soft-tissue concentrations. The PK-PD model-based approach applied in this study could be used to compare or explore the potential of antibiotics for specific indications or in populations with unique target-site PK.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of lefamulin after single intravenous dose administration in subjects with impaired renal function and those requiring hemodialysis.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Lefamulin is a novel IV and oral pleuromutilin recently approved for the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). Given that renal comorbidities are common in patients admitted for CABP, understanding the pharmacokinetics of lefamulin in the face of severe renal impairment, including those requiring hemodialysis, is needed. DESIGN: Open-label, Phase-1 pharmacokinetic study. SETTING: Research Study Center. PATIENTS: Twenty-three matched subjects were included, seven with "Normal" renal function (creatinine clearance >90 ml/min), eight with "Severe" renal impairment (glomerular filtration rate <30 ml/min/1.73 m2 ), and eight subjects requiring hemodialysis. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Subjects were administered a single dose of lefamulin IV 150 mg as a 1-h infusion. Subjects in the hemodialysis group started hemodialysis within 1 h after lefamulin infusion (On dialysis), as well as, on a non-dialysis day (Off dialysis). Plasma, urine, and dialysate fluid were collected for 36 h and analyzed for lefamulin and its major metabolite, BC-8041. Lefamulin was primarily excreted non-renally across groups. Statistical analyses revealed lefamulin and BC-8041 pharmacokinetics were similar between Normal and Severe groups, except for renal clearance, which decreased in Severe subjects (mean 1.3 L/h Normal vs. 0.4 L/h Severe). Likewise, lefamulin pharmacokinetics during on and off dialysis were unchanged, with lefamulin not measurably filtered in dialysate fluid. Two, three, and three subjects reported drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) in Normal, Severe, and Hemodialysis groups, respectively. All TEAEs were mild, except one (infusion-site reaction) that was classified as moderate. CONCLUSION: No dosage adjustment is required for patients with renal impairment, and lefamulin can be administered without regard to hemodialysis timing.

Lefamulin: The First Systemic Pleuromutilin Antibiotic.

OBJECTIVE: To review the pharmacology, microbiology, efficacy, and safety of lefamulin. DATA SOURCES: A literature search was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar (2010 to end-April 2020) with the search terms BC-3781 and lefamulin. Other resources included abstracts presented at recent conferences, prescribing information, and the manufacturer's and Food and Drug Administration websites. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All relevant English-language articles of studies assessing the efficacy and safety of lefamulin were included. DATA SYNTHESIS: Lefamulin is a pleuromutilin antibiotic with activity against Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and atypical bacteria. Lefamulin, given at the dose of 150 mg intravenously or 600 mg orally on an empty stomach every 12 hours for 5 to 7 days, was proven noninferior to moxifloxacin for the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). Common adverse reactions include injection site reactions, hepatic enzyme elevation, gastrointestinal upset, hypokalemia, insomnia, and headache. Lefamulin is associated with QT prolongation, and concomitant use with CYP3A substrates that prolong the QT interval is contraindicated. Lefamulin may cause fetal harm. RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE: Lefamulin is a novel antibiotic with a unique mechanism of action. It represents an alternative option to ß-lactams and macrolides in the treatment of adults with CABP and an alternative option to amoxicillin and doxycycline in the outpatient setting given the rise in resistance to macrolides and safety concerns with fluoroquinolones. Nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea may limit the tolerability of the oral formulation. CONCLUSIONS: Lefamulin is the first systemic pleuromutilin antibiotic that has proven safe and effective for adults with CABP.

Ultrafast liquid chromatographic analysis of erdosteine in human plasma based on fluorimetric detection and precolumn derivatization with 4-bromomethyl-7-methoxycoumarin: Application to pharmacokinetic studies.

In this study, a new analytical method for erdosteine (ERD) in plasma based on high-performance liquid chromatography and a fluorimetric detector, is presented. Precolumn derivatization of ERD with 4-bromomethyl-7-methoxy coumarin (BrMmC) and dibenzo-18-crown-6-ether as a reaction catalyst led to the production of a fluorescent compound. ERD was monitored by fluorescence with an excitation wavelength λext. = 325 nm and emission wavelength λem. = 390 nm. Optimum reaction conditions were carefully studied and optimized. A chromatographic procedure was performed using a C18 column of 150 × 4.6 mm and 3 µm particle size and a mobile phase consisting of methanol:acetonitrile:water (30:30:40, v/v/v) under a flow rate of 0.5 ml min-1 . A calibration plot was established covering analyte concentration range 0.2-3.0 µg ml-1 ; the detection limit was 0.015 µg ml-1 and quantification limit was 0.05 µg ml-1 . Mean recovery was 87.33% and relative standard deviation was calculated to be less than 4.4%. The developed method was successfully used to determine pharmacokinetic preparations of ERD subsequent to administration of a 900 mg dose capsule to a healthy 40-year-old woman volunteer.

An overview of lefamulin for the treatment of community acquired bacterial pneumonia.

INTRODUCTION: Lefamulin is a novel antibiotic that belongs to the pleuromutilin class with excellent activity against all microorganisms, including atypical pathogens, that cause community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). AREAS COVERED: This article reviews the spectrum of activity, the main pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of lefamulin as well as its clinical efficacy and safety in the treatment of CAP in adult patients. EXPERT OPINION: The clinical efficacy of lefamulin in patients with non severe CAP has been demonstrated in 2 randomized clinical trials. Precisely one of the limitations of the phase 3 trials is that the proportion of severe CAP cases is very low. Its particular mechanism of action, affecting ribosomal protein synthesis, provides a low probability of cross-resistance to other commonly used antibiotics in CAP. These findings, together with the antimicrobial activity of lefamulin, its pharmacokinetic parameters and safety profile make it a good alternative for outpatient treatment of CAP. In patients hospitalized with CAP, lefamulin can be used as a potential oral step-down agent after an intravenous regimen with beta-lactams, or as a therapeutic alternative in patients with ß-lactam allergies.

The Effects of Special Patient Population Plasma on Pharmacokinetic Quantifications Using LC-MS/MS.

BACKGROUND: Clinical development of lesinurad, a selective uric acid reabsorption inhibitor, required analysis of lesinurad in plasma from special patient populations. METHODS: EMA and FDA bioanalytical method validation guidance have recommended studying matrix effects on quantitation if samples from special patient populations are to be analyzed. In addition to lesinurad (plasma protein binding 98.2%), the matrix effects from special population plasma on the quantitation of verapamil (PPB 89.6%), allopurinol and oxypurinol (PPB negligible) were also investigated. RESULTS: The plasma from special population patients had no matrix effects on the three quantification methods with stable isotope labeled internal standard, protein precipitation extraction, and LC-MS/MS detection. The validated lesinurad plasma quantification method was successfully applied for the pharmacokinetic evaluations to support the clinical studies in renal impaired patients. CONCLUSION: Special population plasma did not affect quantitation of drugs with a wide range of plasma protein binding levels in human plasma. With the confirmation that there is no impact on quantification from the matrix, the bioanalytical method can be used to support the pharmacokinetic evaluations for clinical studies in special populations.

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment analyses to support intravenous and oral lefamulin dose selection for the treatment of patients with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia.

OBJECTIVES: Lefamulin is a semi-synthetic intravenous (iv) and oral pleuromutilin antibiotic active against community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) pathogens. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment analyses were carried out to evaluate lefamulin 150 mg iv q12h and 600 mg orally q12h under fed and fasted conditions for the treatment of patients with CABP. METHODS: The analyses undertaken used a population PK model based on Phase 1 PK data, non-clinical PK/PD targets for efficacy and in vitro surveillance data for Streptococcus pneumoniae (SP) and Staphylococcus aureus (SA), and Monte Carlo simulation. Percentage probabilities of PK/PD target attainment by MIC on day 1 were determined using median total-drug epithelial lining fluid (ELF) and free-drug plasma AUC:MIC ratio targets associated with 1 and 2 log10 cfu reductions from baseline. RESULTS: Percentage probabilities of attaining the total-drug ELF AUC:MIC ratio target for a 1 log10 cfu reduction from baseline for SP were ≥99.2% at the MIC90 of 0.12 mg/L and 96.7%, 82.1% and 96.3% for iv and oral dosing regimens under fed and fasted conditions, respectively, at the MIC99 of 0.25 mg/L. Percentage probabilities of attaining the free-drug plasma AUC:MIC target for the same endpoint at the SP MIC99 were 100% for each regimen. For the SA MIC90 of 0.12 mg/L and AUC:MIC ratio targets for the same endpoint, percentage probabilities were 92.7%-100% for iv and oral dosing regimens. CONCLUSIONS: These data provide support for lefamulin 150 mg iv q12h and 600 mg orally q12h for the treatment of patients with CABP and suggest that doses may not need to be taken under fasted conditions.

In vivo pharmacodynamics of lefamulin, the first systemic pleuromutilin for human use, in a neutropenic murine thigh infection model.

OBJECTIVES: To characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of lefamulin in the neutropenic murine thigh infection model to ascertain (i) which PK/PD index best correlates with efficacy and (ii) whether the magnitude of the index that drives efficacy varies for different pathogens. METHODS: We evaluated the in vivo PK/PD of lefamulin against five Streptococcus pneumoniae and five Staphylococcus aureus strains using a neutropenic murine thigh infection model. The relationships between bacterial burden in the thigh of normal and neutropenic mice after 24 h of lefamulin treatment and various PK/PD indices were determined. RESULTS: The kinetics of the three doses was linear by AUC. Rate of killing was maximal at concentrations near the MIC; suppression of regrowth was dose dependent, with a post-antibiotic effect of 3.0-3.5 and 1.0-1.5 h against S. pneumoniae and S. aureus, respectively. The efficacy of lefamulin correlated most strongly with the AUC0-24/MIC ratio; coefficient of determination was 79.9% for S. pneumoniae and 78.3% for S. aureus. The magnitude of the 24 h AUC/MIC of total drug required ranged from 9.92 to 32.1 for S. pneumoniae and 40.2 to 82.5 for S. aureus, corresponding to free drug values (∼20% free fraction) of 1.98-6.42 and 8.04-16.5, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Lefamulin, the first systemically available pleuromutilin in humans, exhibits time- and concentration-dependent killing. The presence of white blood cells had only a slight effect in enhancing the activity of the drug, indicating a leucocyte-independent effect. The identified driver of efficacy, the AUC0-24/MIC ratio and the ratios determined against various S. aureus and S. pneumoniae strains, will inform further non-clinical and clinical trials.

Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of lefamulin following intravenous and oral dosing.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the pharmacokinetics (PK) of oral and intravenous (iv) lefamulin after single and multiple doses, and the effect of food on bioavailability. METHODS: Lefamulin PK was examined in four studies. In Study 1, PK was assessed in patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections who received repeated iv lefamulin q12h (150 mg). In Study 2, a four-period crossover study, healthy subjects received a single dose of oral lefamulin [immediate-release (IR) tablet, 1 × 600 mg] in a fasted and fed state, oral lefamulin (capsule, 3 × 200 mg) in a fasted state, and iv lefamulin in a fasted state. In Study 3, a three-period crossover study, healthy males received a single oral lefamulin dose (IR) in the following states: fasted, fasted followed by a high-calorie meal 1 h post-dose, and fed. Study 4 had two parts; in part A, healthy males received a single lefamulin dose (IR) in a fasted and fed state; in part B, subjects received repeated doses of lefamulin (IR, q12h) or placebo. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded in each study. RESULTS: Single and repeated dosing of iv and oral lefamulin resulted in comparable exposure. Intravenous and oral lefamulin (given fasted or with a meal 1 h post-dose) resulted in bioequivalence. Bioequivalence was not established between oral lefamulin in the fed state and iv or oral administration in the fasted state. All AEs were mild or moderate in severity, no serious AEs were reported, and no participant discontinued because of an AE. CONCLUSIONS: The PK of lefamulin supports successful switch from iv to oral therapy; lefamulin was generally well tolerated.

Prediction of lefamulin epithelial lining fluid penetration after intravenous and oral administration using Phase 1 data and population pharmacokinetics methods.

OBJECTIVES: Lefamulin is a semi-synthetic intravenous and oral pleuromutilin antibiotic with activity against pathogens commonly associated with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. Using data from two Phase 1 studies, a population pharmacokinetics (PPK) model for lefamulin in plasma and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) was constructed. METHODS: Plasma pharmacokinetic (PK) data from a crossover, bioavailability, food-effect study and plasma and ELF PK data from a tissue penetration study in normal healthy volunteers were used to construct a PPK model for lefamulin. Model development involved refinement of a previous PPK model for intravenous and oral administration, followed by application of the model to plasma and ELF data from the tissue penetration study. The ELF penetration ratio of lefamulin was determined using model-based simulations. RESULTS: The PPK analysis data set contained 1103 plasma and 12 ELF lefamulin concentrations from 32 subjects. A three-compartment model with non-linear protein binding and two parallel absorption processes provided precise and unbiased estimated plasma concentration-time profiles. The absorption rate was slower and bioavailability was decreased after a high-fat/high-calorie meal. ELF data were well described using first-order rate constants into and out of the ELF compartment. The median predicted lefamulin total-drug ELF AUC0-24/free-drug plasma AUC0-24 ratio was ∼5:1 after intravenous or oral administration. CONCLUSIONS: The final PPK model allowed precise characterization of plasma and ELF exposures after intravenous and oral administration. The high ELF penetration ratio suggests that the penetration of lefamulin into the effect site is rapid and extensive, irrespective of route of administration.

Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of lefamulin in a neutropenic murine pneumonia model with Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae.

OBJECTIVES: To present results of preclinical studies that supported further development of lefamulin for treating patients with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). METHODS: The effect of bovine lung surfactant on the antibacterial activity of lefamulin against Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus was determined by broth microdilution assay. In vitro accumulation of lefamulin was evaluated in J774 mouse macrophages. Pharmacokinetics was assessed in female BALB/c (Bagg albino) mice treated with subcutaneous lefamulin (35 or 70 mg/kg). In neutropenic lung infection experiments, BALB/c mice received intraperitoneal cyclophosphamide before challenge with single S. pneumoniae or S. aureus strains; subcutaneous lefamulin (1.25-160 mg/kg) was given twice daily post-infection. Hill models described relationships between AUC/MIC ratios and changes in log10 cfu. RESULTS: Lung surfactant did not significantly increase lefamulin MIC values against test strains. Lefamulin uptake in macrophages was rapid (a plateau was reached in ∼3 h). In mice, distribution of lefamulin [plasma to epithelial lining fluid (ELF)] was rapid, showing an ∼2-fold increase in lefamulin exposure in the ELF during the 5.5 h period. Median plasma AUC/MIC ratios associated with 1 and 2 log10 cfu reductions from baseline were 1.37 and 2.15, respectively, for S. pneumoniae and 2.13 and 6.24 for S. aureus. Corresponding ELF results were 14.0 and 22.0 for S. pneumoniae and 21.7 and 63.9 for S. aureus. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, lefamulin displays desirable pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships that are predictive of the clinical effectiveness of lefamulin and other antibacterial agents used to treat CABP.

Introduction: lefamulin and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic rationale to support the dose selection of lefamulin.

Lefamulin is the first semisynthetic pleuromutilin being developed for oral and intravenous administration. The drug selectively inhibits prokaryotic ribosomal protein synthesis by binding to the peptidyl transferase centre via four H-bonds and other interactions, resulting in an 'induced fit' that tightens the binding pocket around lefamulin. This unique mechanism of action has been associated with a low probability of cross-resistance to other antimicrobial classes commonly used to treat community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). This Supplement, entitled 'Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses and dose rationale for lefamulin, a novel pleuromutilin antibiotic, for the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia', is intended to be a valuable resource for both clinicians and researchers. It provides the essential pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data on lefamulin that were used to support the optimal dose selection of lefamulin for the safe and effective treatment of CABP in adults.

Ultra-performance hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry for simultaneous determination of allopurinol, oxypurinol and lesinurad in rat plasma: Application to pharmacokinetic study in rats.

A fixed dose combination of lesinurad and allopurinol has been recently approved by USFDA and EMA for treatment of gout-associated hyperuricemia in patients who have not achieved target serum uric acid levels with allopurinol alone. In this study, an ultra-performance hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (UPHILIC) coupled with tandem mass spectrometry method was developed and validated for simultaneous determination of allopurinol, oxypurinol and lesinurad in rat plasma. Liquid liquid extraction using ethyl acetate as extracting agent was used for samples extraction procedure. Acquity UPLC HILIC column (100 mm x 2.1, 1.7µm) was used for separation of allopurinol, oxypurinol, lesinurad and internal standard (5-Florouracil). The mobile phase consisting of acetonitrile, water and formic acid (95:5:0.1, v/v/v), were eluted at 0.3 mL/min flow rate having total chromatographic run time of 3 min per sample. The analytes were detected on Acquity triple quadrupole mass spectrometer equipped with a Z-Spray electrospray ionization (ESI). The ESI source was operated in negative mode and multiple reaction monitoring was used for ion transition for all compounds. The precursor to product ion transition of m/z 134.94 > 64.07 for allopurinol, 150.89 > 41.91 for oxypurinol, 401.90 > 176.79 for lesinurad and 128.85 >41.92 for internal standard were used for identification and quantification. The calibration curves for all analytes were found to be linear with weighing factor of 1/x2 using regression analysis. The developed assay was successfully applied in an oral pharmacokinetic study of allopurinol, oxypurinol and lesinurad in rats.

Effects of Food and Antacids on Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Lesinurad, a Selective Urate Reabsorption Inhibitor.

Two clinical studies were performed in healthy volunteers to investigate food and antacid effects on lesinurad, a novel selective uric acid reabsorption inhibitor approved for treatment of hyperuricemia associated with gout in combination with xanthine oxidase inhibitors. Study 1 evaluated a high-fat, high-calorie meal or high doses of antacids (3000 mg calcium carbonate or 1600 mg magnesium hydroxide/1600 mg aluminum hydroxide) on the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of 400 mg oral lesinurad. Study 2 evaluated low doses of antacids (1250 mg calcium carbonate or 800 mg magnesium hydroxide/800 mg aluminum hydroxide) on the PK and PD of 400 mg lesinurad. Food did not alter the plasma AUC of lesinurad and only reduced its Cmax by 18%. In the fasted conditions, high-dose calcium carbonate reduced the Cmax and AUC of lesinurad by 54% and 38%, respectively, whereas high-dose magnesium hydroxide/aluminum hydroxide reduced Cmax and AUC by 36% and 31%, respectively. Food enhanced the maximum serum urate (sUA)-lowering effect of lesinurad by approximately 20% despite reducing the Cmax of lesinurad. High-dose calcium carbonate decreased the urate-lowering effect approximately 20% in the first 6 hours, whereas high-dose magnesium hydroxide/aluminum hydroxide reduced the effect by 26%. Low-dose calcium carbonate or magnesium hydroxide/aluminum hydroxide in the presence of food did not significantly affect plasma lesinurad Cmax and AUC or the sUA lowering and renal handling of uric acid. In summary, study results suggest food did not meaningfully alter lesinurad PK and PD. High doses of antacids reduced lesinurad AUC up to 40% and reduced the lesinurad uric acid-lowering effect.

Metabolism and disposition of lesinurad, a uric acid reabsorption inhibitor, in humans.

The objectives of this study were to determine the absolute bioavailability of lesinurad and to characterized its disposition in humans. The oral bioavailability assessment was performed using a clinical design of simultaneous dosing of a therapeutic oral dose of lesinurad with an intravenous infusion of [14C]lesinurad microdose. The bioavailability of lesinurad was determined to be 100%. The disposition of lesinurad in humans involves hepatic oxidation and renal elimination following administration of oral [14C]lesinurad dose. Metabolism of lesinurad occurred post-systemically with low circulating levels of metabolites <3% of total radioactivity as 74.2% of total radioactivity was attributed to lesinurad. In vitro metabolism studies identified CYP2C9 as the predominant isoform, and summation of metabolites indicated that it was responsible for ∼50% of metabolism.

Lefamulin: Review of a Promising Novel Pleuromutilin Antibiotic.

The emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance have led to a global public health emergency requiring development of new antimicrobial classes. Lefamulin (formally BC-3781) is a novel pleuromutilin antibiotic currently undergoing Food and Drug Administration review for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) as intravenous (IV) and oral (PO) formulations. Although pleuromutilin antibiotics were first developed in the 1950s, lefamulin is the first to be used for systemic treatment of bacterial infections in humans. Lefamulin exhibits a unique mechanism of action through inhibition of protein synthesis by binding to the peptidyl transferase center of the 50S bacterial ribosome, thus preventing the binding of transfer RNA for peptide transfer. Lefamulin displays activity against gram-positive and atypical organisms associated with CABP (i.e., Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Legionella pneumophila, and Chlamydophila pneumoniae), with an expanded gram-positive spectrum including Staphylococcus aureus (i.e., methicillin-resistant, vancomycin-intermediate, and heterogeneous strains) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. Lefamulin was also shown to retain activity against multidrug-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Mycoplasma genitalium. Lefamulin exhibits time-dependent killing, and the pharmacodynamic target best associated with antibacterial activity is ƒAUC0-24 /MIC (minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC]). Preclinical and phase II trials indicate that lefamulin concentrates in lung tissue are well tolerated at an IV dose of 150 mg twice/day over 1 hour or a PO dose of 600 mg twice/day, and preliminary phase III data suggest similar efficacy when compared with moxifloxacin with or without linezolid in CABP. Documented resistance and cross-resistance with other gram-positive antibacterials remains low. Additional published in vitro, in vivo, and preclinical trial data suggest further exploration of lefamulin in various infectious disease states (e.g., acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, and sexually transmitted infections). This review discusses the pertinent bacterial spectrum of activity, preclinical and ongoing clinical data, and potential roles in therapy for lefamulin.

Verinurad combined with febuxostat in Japanese adults with gout or asymptomatic hyperuricaemia: a phase 2a, open-label study.

Objectives: Verinurad (RDEA3170) is a high-affinity inhibitor of the URAT1 transporter in clinical development for treating gout and asymptomatic hyperuricaemia. The aim of this Phase 2a, randomized, open-label study was to investigate the multiple-dose pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics and safety of oral verinurad combined with febuxostat vs febuxostat alone and verinurad alone. Methods: Japanese male subjects aged 21-65 years with gout (n = 37) or asymptomatic hyperuricaemia (n = 35) and serum urate (sUA) ⩾8 mg/dl were randomized to febuxostat (10, 20, 40 mg) in combination with verinurad (2.5-10 mg), verinurad alone (2.5-15 mg), febuxostat alone (10, 20, 40 mg) or benzbromarone alone (50 mg). There were four treatment periods per cohort and each treatment period was 7 days. Study drugs were administered once-daily after breakfast. Plasma, serum and urine samples were measured at pre-set intervals on days -1, 7, 14, 21 and 28. Results: Verinurad combined with febuxostat decreased sUA in dose-dependent manner, providing greater sUA lowering than febuxostat alone at the same dose (P < 0.001). Urinary uric acid excretion rate was increased by verinurad, reduced by febuxostat and comparable to baseline for verinurad combined with febuxostat. Verinurad from 2.5 mg to 15 mg was well tolerated, with no withdrawals due to adverse events. Laboratory assessments showed no clinically meaningful changes during combination treatment. Conclusion: Verinurad combined with febuxostat decreased sUA dose-dependently while maintaining uric acid excretion similar to baseline. All dose combinations of verinurad and febuxostat were generally well tolerated. These data support continued investigation of oral verinurad in patients with gout. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02317861.

Lesinurad for the treatment of hyperuricaemia in people with gout.

INTRODUCTION: Gout is a common form of inflammatory arthritis caused by deposition of monosodium urate crystals. The central strategy for effective long-term management of gout is serum urate lowering. Current urate-lowering drugs include both xanthine oxidase inhibitors and uricosuric agents. Lesinurad is a URAT1 inhibitor that selectively inhibits urate rebsorption at the proximal renal tubule. Lesinurad 200mg daily in combination with a xanthine oxidase is approved for urate-lowering therapy in patients with gout. Areas covered: The published literature was searched using Pubmed and additional information was obtained from publically available regulatory documents. Pre-clinical data and clinical trials of lesinurad are described. Serum urate-lowering efficacy and effects on other clinical endpoints are discussed. Adverse event data, focusing on renal safety are also presented. Expert opinion: Lesinurad is an effective urate-lowering drug that has a generally acceptable safety profile when used at 200mg daily dosing in combination with a xanthine oxidase inhibitor. The recent approval of fixed dose combination pills of lesinurad with allopurinol is an important step in improving adherence and reducing risk of renal adverse events. It remains to be seen if this therapy will provide additional benefit for gout management above improved use of widely available generic therapies.

Evaluation of Pharmacokinetic Interactions Between Lesinurad, a New Selective Urate Reabsorption Inhibitor, and Commonly Used Drugs for Gout Treatment.

Lesinurad is a novel selective uric acid reabsorption inhibitor approved for treatment of hyperuricemia associated with gout in combination with xanthine oxidase inhibitors (XOIs). Open-label pharmacokinetic studies were performed in volunteers or subjects with hyperuricemia (serum uric acid ≥ 8 mg/dL) to investigate interactions of lesinurad (with and without concurrent XOIs) with colchicine and 2 nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: naproxen and indomethacin. Colchicine studies included consecutive 7-day treatment periods of (1) allopurinol 300 mg, allopurinol 300 mg plus lesinurad 400 or 600 mg, and continued lesinurad 400 or 600 mg; or (2) febuxostat 40 or 80 mg, febuxostat 40 or 80 mg plus lesinurad 400 mg, and continued febuxostat 40 or 80 mg plus lesinurad 600 mg. Naproxen and indomethacin studies included lesinurad 400 mg on day 1, naproxen 250 mg twice daily or indomethacin 25 mg twice daily on days 2-6, and lesinurad 400 mg plus continued naproxen or indomethacin on days 7-13 and the morning of day 14. Lesinurad did not alter the pharmacokinetics of naproxen and modestly altered exposure to colchicine (AUC decrease of ≤ 25%) and indomethacin (AUC increase of ∼35%). Indomethacin did not alter the pharmacokinetics of lesinurad, whereas naproxen modestly decreased the Cmax of lesinurad by ∼27%.

Effects of renal function on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of lesinurad in adult volunteers.

INTRODUCTION: Lesinurad is a selective uric acid reabsorption inhibitor approved for the treatment of gout in combination with a xanthine oxidase inhibitor (XOI) in patients who have not achieved target serum uric acid (sUA) levels with an XOI alone. Most people with gout have chronic kidney disease. The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of lesinurad were assessed in subjects with impaired renal function. METHODS: Two Phase I, multicenter, open-label, single-dose studies enrolled subjects with normal renal function (estimated creatinine clearance [eCrCl] >90 mL/min; N=12) or mild (eCrCl 60-89 mL/min; N=8), moderate (eCrCl 30-59 mL/min; N=16), or severe (eCrCl <30 mL/min; N=6) renal impairment. Subjects were given a single oral lesinurad dose of 200 mg (N=24) or 400 mg (N=18). Blood and urine samples were analyzed for plasma lesinurad concentrations and serum and urine uric acid concentrations. Safety was assessed by adverse events and laboratory data. RESULTS: Mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment increased lesinurad plasma area under the plasma concentration-time curve by 34%, 54%-65%, and 102%, respectively. Lesinurad plasma Cmax was unaffected by renal function status. Lower renal clearance and urinary excretion of lesinurad were associated with the degree of renal impairment. The sUA-lowering effect of a single dose of lesinurad was similar between mild renal impairment and normal function, reduced in moderate impairment, and greatly diminished in severe impairment. Lesinurad increased urinary urate excretion in normal function and mild renal impairment; the increase was less with moderate or severe renal impairment. Lesinurad was well tolerated by all subjects. CONCLUSION: Lesinurad exposure increased with decreasing renal function; however, the effects of lesinurad on sUA were attenuated in moderate to severe renal impairment.