Efficacy and safety of mesenchymal stem cell therapies for ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in the treatment of ischemic stroke (IS) remains controversial. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MSCs for IS. METHODS: A literature search until May 23, 2023, was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science to identify studies on stem cell therapy for IS. Interventional and observational clinical studies of MSCs in patients with IS were included, and the safety and efficacy were assessed. Two reviewers extracted data and assessed the quality independently. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan5.4. RESULTS: Fifteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 15 non-randomized trials, including 1217 patients (624 and 593 in the intervention and control arms, respectively), were analyzed. MSCs significantly improved patients' activities of daily living according to the modified Rankin scale (mean difference [MD]: -0.26; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.50 to -0.01; P = .04) and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (MD: -1.69; 95% CI: -2.66 to -0.73; P < .001) in RCTs. MSC treatment was associated with lower mortality rates in RCTs (risk ratio: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.28-0.69; P < .001). Fever and headache were among the most reported adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our review, MSC transplantation improves neurological deficits and daily activities in patients with IS. In the future, prospective studies with large sample sizes are needed for stem cell studies in ischemic stroke. This meta-analysis has been registered at PROSPERO with CRD42022347156.

Intravenous injection of allogenic canine mesenchymal stem cells in 40 client-owned dogs: a safety assessment in veterinary clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the adverse effects of allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) transplanted via intravenous infusion in dogs and examine their safety. We performed a retrospective analysis of various clinical assessments, including physical examination, blood tests, and radiographs, and monitored the formation of neoplasms during a 6-month follow-up period in 40 client-owned dogs that received intravenous infusion of adipose tissue-derived MSCs (AT-MSCs) for the treatment of various underlying diseases between 2012 and 2018. RESULTS: No significant adverse effects of MSC therapy were detected by clinical assessment, blood tests, or radiographic examination in the 6-month follow-up period after the first MSC treatment. Additionally no new neoplasms were observed during this period. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this study is the first to evaluate the safety aspects (≥ 6 months) associated with intravenous allogeneic AT-MSC infusion. These results suggest that allogenic AT-MSC infusion could be a useful and relatively safe therapeutic approach in canines.

Safety and potential effects of intrathecal injection of allogeneic human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes in complete subacute spinal cord injury: a first-in-human, single-arm, open-label, phase I clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: Neurological and functional impairments are commonly observed in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) due to insufficient regeneration of damaged axons. Exosomes play a crucial role in the paracrine effects of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and have emerged as a promising therapeutic approach for SCI. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the safety and potential effects of intrathecal administration of allogeneic exosomes derived from human umbilical cord MSCs (HUC-MSCs) in patients with complete subacute SCI. METHODS: This study was a single-arm, open-label, phase I clinical trial with a 12-month follow-up period. HUC-MSCs were extracted from human umbilical cord tissue, and exosomes were isolated via ultracentrifugation. After intrathecal injection, each participant a underwent complete evaluation, including neurological assessment using the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) scale, functional assessment using the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM-III), neurogenic bowel dysfunction (NBD) assessment using the NBD score, modified Ashworth scale (MAS), and lower urinary tract function questionnaire. RESULTS: Nine patients with complete subacute SCI were recruited. The intrathecal injection of allogeneic HUC-MSCs-exosomes was safe and well tolerated. No early or late adverse event (AE) attributable to the study intervention was observed. Significant improvements in ASIA pinprick (P-value = 0.039) and light touch (P-value = 0.038) scores, SCIM III total score (P-value = 0.027), and NBD score (P-value = 0.042) were also observed at 12-month after the injection compared with baseline. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that intrathecal administration of allogeneic HUC-MSCs-exosomes is safe in patients with subacute SCI. Moreover, it seems that this therapy might be associated with potential clinical and functional improvements in these patients. In this regard, future larger phase II/III clinical trials with adequate power are highly required. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials, IRCT20200502047277N1. Registered 2 October 2020, https://en.irct.ir/trial/48765 .

Human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stromal cells for the treatment of steroid refractory grades III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease with long-term follow-up.

Introduction: Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have been extensively studied as a potential treatment for steroid refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD). However, the majority of clinical trials have focused on bone marrow-derived MSCs. Methods: In this study, we report the outcomes of 86 patients with grade III-IV (82.6% grade IV) steroid refractory aGVHD who were treated with human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (UC-MSCs). The patient cohort included 17 children and 69 adults. All patients received intravenous infusions of UC-MSCs at a dose of 1 × 106 cells per kg body weight, with a median of 4 infusions (ranging from 1 to 16). Results: The median time between the onset of aGVHD and the first infusion of UC-MSCs was 7 days (ranging from 3 to 88 days). At day 28, the overall response (OR) rate was 52.3%. Specifically, 24 patients (27.9%) achieved complete remission, while 21 (24.4%) exhibited partial remission. The estimated survival probability at 100 days was 43.7%. Following a median follow-up of 108 months (ranging from 61 to 159 months), the survival rate was approximately 11.6% (10/86). Patients who developed acute lower GI tract and liver GVHD exhibited poorer OR rates at day 28 compared to those with only acute lower GI tract GVHD (22.2% vs. 58.8%; p= 0.049). No patient experienced serious adverse events. Discussion: These finding suggest that UC-MSCs are safe and effective in both children and adults with steroid refractory aGVHD. UC-MSCs could be considered as a feasible treatment option for this challenging conditon. (NCT01754454).

Efficacy and safety of culture-expanded mesenchymal stromal cell therapy in the treatment of 4 types of inflammatory arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 36 randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) transplantation in the treatment of inflammatory arthritis. METHODS: Two researchers conducted a comprehensive search of Chinese and English databases from their inception until July 2023. The literature screening and data extraction were then performed. Statistical analysis was carried out using RevMan 5.4 software. RESULTS: A total of 36 relevant RCTs, involving 2,076 participants, were ultimately included in this study. These RCTs encompassed four types of inflammatory arthritis, namely rheumatoid arthritis (RA), osteoarthritis (OA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and systemic sclerosis (SSc). The results demonstrated that MSC therapy exhibited improvements in the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain in OA patients (bone marrow: SMD=-0.95, 95 % CI: -1.55 to -0.36, P = 0.002; umbilical cord: SMD=-2.03, 95 % CI: -2.99 to -1.07, P < 0.0001; adipose tissue: SMD=-1.26, 95 % CI: -1.99 to -0.52, P = 0.0009). Specifically, MSCs sourced from adipose tissue showed enhancements in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) pain (P = 0.0001), WOMAC physical function (P = 0.001), and total WOMAC scores (P = 0.0003). As for MSC therapy in RA, AS, and SSc, the current systematic review suggests a potential therapeutic effect of MSCs on these inflammatory arthritic conditions. Safety assessments indicated that MSC therapy did not increase the incidence of adverse events. CONCLUSION: MSCs have the potential to alleviate joint pain and improve joint function in patients with inflammatory arthritis. Moreover, MSC therapy appears to be relatively safe and could be considered as a viable alternative treatment option for inflammatory arthritis.

Efficacy and safety of mesenchymal stem cells therapy in COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has become a serious public health issue. In COVID-19 patients, the elevated levels of inflammatory cytokines lead to the manifestation of COVID-19 symptoms, such as lung tissue edema, lung diffusion dysfunction, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), secondary infection, and ultimately mortality. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) exhibit anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties, thus providing a potential treatment option for COVID-19. The number of clinical trials of MSCs for COVID-19 has been rising. However, the treatment protocols and therapeutic effects of MSCs for COVID-19 patients are inconsistent. This meta-analysis was performed to systematically determine the safety and efficacy of MSC infusion in COVID-19 patients. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive literature search from PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library up to 22 November 2023 to screen for eligible randomized controlled trials. Inclusion and exclusion criteria for searched literature were formulated according to the PICOS principle, followed by the use of literature quality assessment tools to assess the risk of bias. Finally, outcome measurements including therapeutic efficacy, clinical symptoms, and adverse events of each study were extracted for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 14 randomized controlled trials were collected. The results of enrolled studies demonstrated that patients with COVID-19 pneumonia who received MSC inoculation showed a decreased mortality compared with counterparts who received conventional treatment (RR: 0.76; 95% CI [0.60, 0.96]; p = 0.02). Reciprocally, MSC inoculation improved the clinical symptoms in patients (RR: 1.28; 95% CI [1.06, 1.55]; p = 0.009). In terms of immune biomarkers, MSC treatment inhibited inflammation responses in COVID-19 patients, as was indicated by the decreased levels of CRP and IL-6. Importantly, our results showed that no significant differences in the incidence of adverse reactions or serious adverse events were monitored in patients after MSC inoculation. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis demonstrated that MSC inoculation is effective and safe in the treatment of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Without increasing the incidence of adverse events or serious adverse events, MSC treatment decreased patient mortality and inflammatory levels and improved the clinical symptoms in COVID-19 patients. However, large-cohort randomized controlled trials with expanded numbers of patients are required to further confirm our results.

Neurological efficacy and safety of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) therapy in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS): An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Current therapeutic strategies for multiple sclerosis (MS) aim to suppress the immune response and reduce relapse rates. As alternative treatments, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are being explored. MSCs show promise in repairing nerve tissue and reducing autoimmune responses in people with MS (pwMS). OBJECTIVE: This review delves into the literature on the efficacy and safety of MSC therapy for pwMS. METHODS: A comprehensive search strategy was employed to identify relevant articles from five databases until January 2024. The inclusion criteria encompassed interventional studies. Efficacy and safety data concerning MSC therapy in relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), secondary progressive MS (SPMS), and primary progressive MS (PPMS) groups were extracted and analyzed. RESULTS: A comprehensive analysis encompassing 30 studies revealed that individuals who underwent intrathecal (IT) protocol-based transplantation of MSCs experienced a noteworthy improvement in their expanded disability status scale (EDSS) compared to the placebo group. Weighted mean difference (WMD) was -0.28; 95 % CI -0.53 to -0.03, I2 = 0 %, p-value = 0.028); however, the intravenous (IV) group did not show significant changes in EDSS scores. The annualized relapse rate (ARR) did not significantly decrease among pwMS (WMD = -0.34; 95 % CI -1.05 to 0.38, I2 = 98 %, p-value = 0.357). Favorable results were observed in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), with only 19.11 % of pwMS showing contrast-enhanced lesions (CEL) in the short term and no long-term MRI activity. The most common complications in both short-term and long-term follow-ups were infection, back pain, and gastrointestinal symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights the safety potential of MSC therapy for pwMS. While MRI-based neural regeneration shows significant treatment potential, the effectiveness of MSC therapy remains uncertain due to study limitations and ineffective outcome measures. Further research is needed to establish efficacy and optimize evaluation methods for MSC therapy on pwMS.

Relative efficacy and safety of mesenchymal stem cells for osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Introduction: The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA). Methods: The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to May 6, 2024 to identify randomized controlled trials that compared MSCs and placebo or other nonsurgical approaches for treating OA. Two investigators independently searched the literature and extracted data, and conventional meta-analyses were conducted with Review Manager 5.3. The outcomes included pain relief, functional improvement, and risk of adverse events (AEs). Results: A total of 18 articles were included. Overall, MSCs were superior to placebo in terms of relieving pain and improving function at the 12-month follow-up. However, the differences in treatment-related AEs were not significant. Conclusion: MSCs may relieving pain and improving function of OA. The limitations of this study include the high heterogeneity of the included studies. Additionally, the follow-up time in the included studies was relatively short, so more clinical trials are needed to predict the long-term efficacy and safety of MSCs. Systematic review registration: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/5BT6E, identifier CRD42022354824.

Safety and efficacy of autologous adipose tissue-derived stem cell transplantation in aging-related low-grade inflammation patients: a single-group, open-label, phase I clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Inflamm-aging is associated with the rate of aging and is significantly related to diseases such as Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, atherosclerosis, heart disease, and age-related degenerative diseases such as type II diabetes and osteoporosis. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficiency of autologous adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cell (AD-MSC) transplantation in aging-related low-grade inflammation patients. METHODS: This study is a single-group, open-label, phase I clinical trial in which patients treated with 2 infusions (100 million cells i.v) of autologous AD-MSCs were initially evaluated in 12 inflamm-aging patients who concurrently had highly proinflammatory cytokines and 2 of the following 3 diseases: diabetes, dyslipidemia, and obesity. The treatment effects were evaluated based on plasma cytokines. RESULTS: During the study's follow-up period, no adverse effects were observed in AD-MSC injection patients. Compared to baseline (D-44), the inflammatory cytokines IL-1α, IL-1ß, IL-8, IL-6, and TNF-α were significantly reduced after 180 days (D180) of MSC infusion. IL-4/IL-10 at 90 days (D90) and IL-2/IL-10 at D180 increased, reversing the imbalance between proinflammatory and inflammatory ratios in the patients. CONCLUSION: AD-MSCs represent a potential intervention to prevent age-related inflammation in patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov number is NCT05827757, first registered on 13th Oct 2020.

Autologous bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells are safe for the treatment of Achilles tendinopathy.

Achilles tendinopathy is a disabling condition that affects more than 50% of runners. Pre-clinical studies in a large animal model of naturally-occurring tendinopathy similar to human Achilles tendinopathy has shown benefits of autologous bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) implantation. However, MSCs are advanced therapies medicinal products (ATMPs), with strict regulatory requirements. Guided by the regulator we carried out a first in man study to assess the safety and efficacy of autologous MSC injection in human patients with non-insertional Achilles tendinopathy. Ten patients, mean age 47 with mid-portion Achilles tendon pain and swelling for more than 6 months, underwent autologous cultured cell injections (median 12.2 × 106, range 5-19 × 106 cells) into their Achilles tendon. At 24 weeks follow-up, no serious adverse reactions or important medical events were observed. MOXFQ, EQ-5D-5L, and VISA-A scores improved clinically at 12 and 24 weeks. VAS pain improved increasingly at 6, 12 and 24 weeks. MOXFQ Pain and VISA-A Scores improved > 12 points from baseline to 24 weeks in 8 patients. Maximum anteroposterior tendon thickness as measured by greyscale US decreased by mean 0.8 mm at 24 weeks. This phase IIa study demonstrated the safety of autologous MSC injection for non-insertional Achilles tendinopathy and provides proof-of-concept of the technique in patients, all of whom had previously failed conservative treatments for chronic disease and leads the way for a larger randomised controlled trial.

The safety profile of mesenchymal stem cell therapy administered through intrathecal injections for treating neurological disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Based on previous in vivo studies and human trials, intrathecal cell delivery is a safe and relevant therapeutic tool for improving patient's quality of life with neurological conditions. We aimed to characterise the safety profile of intrathecally delivered Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). METHODS: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, KCI-Korean Journal Database, and Web of Science. Databases were searched from their inception until April 13, 2023. Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) that compared intrathecal delivery of MSCs to controls in adult populations were included. Adverse events (AEs) were pooled and meta-analysed using DerSimonian-Laird random effects models with a correction factor 0.5 added to studies with zero count cells. Pooled AEs were described using Risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Then, a random-effects meta-regress model on study-level summary data was performed to explore the relationship between the occurrence of AEs and covariates thought to modify the overall effect estimate. Finally, publication bias was assessed. RESULTS: 303 records were reviewed, and nine RCTs met the inclusion criteria and were included in the quantitative synthesis (n = 540 patients). MSCs delivered intrathecally, as compared to controls, were associated with an increased probability of AEs of musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders (categorised by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events-CTCAE version 5.0) (RR: 1.61, 95% CI 1.19-2.19, I2 = 0%). The random-effects meta-regress model suggested that fresh MSCs increased the probability of occurrence of AEs compared to cryopreserved MSCs (RR: 1.554; p-value = 0.048; 95% CI 1.004-2.404), and the multiple-dose, decreased the probability of AEs by 36% compared to single doses (RR: 0.644; p-value = 0.048; 95% CI 0.416-0.996); however, univariate random effects meta-regression models revealed a not significant association between the occurrence of AEs from MSCs intrathecal delivery and each covariate. CONCLUSIONS: Intrathecal delivery of MSCs was associated with a slight increase in AEs associated with musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders, albeit without serious AEs. We conclude that intrathecal MSCs delivery is safe for patients with neurological conditions. However, further high-quality, large-scale RCTs are needed to confirm these findings.

Two-year safety outcomes of iPS cell-derived mesenchymal stromal cells in acute steroid-resistant graft-versus-host disease.

The first completed clinical trial of induced pluripotent stem cell (iPS cell)-derived cells was conducted in 15 participants with steroid-resistant acute graft-versus-host disease. After intravenous infusion of mesenchymal stromal cells (CYP-001 derived from a clone of human iPS cells), we reported the safety, tolerability and efficacy within the primary evaluation period at day 100. We now report results at the 2-year follow-up: 9 of 15 (60%) participants survived, which compares favorably with previously reported outcomes in studies of steroid-resistant acute graft-versus-host disease. Causes of death were complications commonly observed in recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and not considered by the investigators to be related to CYP-001 treatment. There were no serious adverse events, tumors or other safety concerns related to CYP-001. In conclusion, systemic delivery of iPS cell-derived cells was safe and well tolerated over 2 years of follow-up, with sustained outcomes up to 2 years after the first infusion. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT02923375 .

Safety and efficacy of umbilical cord tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of patients with aging frailty: a phase I/II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) hold a great promise for cell-based therapy in the field of regenerative medicine. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravenous infusion of human umbilical cord-derived MSCs (HUC-MSCs) in patients with aging frailty. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, participants diagnosed with aging frailty were randomly assigned to receive intravenous administrations of HUC-MSCs or placebo. All of serious adverse events and AEs were monitored to evaluate the safety of treatment during the 6-month follow-up. The primary efficacy endpoint was alteration of physical component scores (PCS) of SF-36 qualities of life at 6 months. The secondary outcomes including physical performance tests and pro-inflammatory cytokines, were also observed and compared at each follow-up visits. All evaluations were performed at 1 week, 1, 2, 3 and 6 months following the first intravenous infusion of HUC-MSCs. RESULTS: In the MSCs group, significant improvements in PCS of SF-36 were observed from first post-treatment visit and sustained throughout the follow-up period, with greater changes compared to the placebo group (p = 0.042). EQ-VAS scores of MSCs group improved significantly at 2 month (p = 0.023) and continued until the end of the 6-month visit (p = 0.002) in comparison to the placebo group. The timed up and go (TUG) physical performance test revealed significant group difference and showed continual enhancements over 6 months (p < 0.05). MSC transplantation improved the function of 4-m walking test (4MWT) compared with the placebo group with a decrease of 2.05 s at 6 months of follow-up (p = 0.21). The measurement of grip strength revealed group difference with MSCs group demonstrating better performance, particularly at 6 months (p = 0.002). Inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-17) exhibited declines in MSCs group at 6 months compared to the placebo group (p = 0.034 and 0.033, respectively). There was no difference of incidence of AEs between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Intravenous transplantation of HUC-MSCs is a safe and effective therapeutic approach on aging frailty. The positive outcomes observed in improving quality of life, physical performance, and reducing chronic inflammation, suggest that HUC-MSC therapy may be a promising potential treatment option for aging frailty. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrial.gov; NCT04314011; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04314011 .

Efficacy and safety of human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of refractory immune thrombocytopenia: a prospective, single arm, phase I trial.

Patients with refractory immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) frequently encounter substantial bleeding risks and demonstrate limited responsiveness to existing therapies. Umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSCs) present a promising alternative, capitalizing on their low immunogenicity and potent immunomodulatory effects for treating diverse autoimmune disorders. This prospective phase I trial enrolled eighteen eligible patients to explore the safety and efficacy of UC-MSCs in treating refractory ITP. The research design included administering UC-MSCs at escalating doses of 0.5 × 106 cells/kg, 1.0 × 106 cells/kg, and 2.0 × 106 cells/kg weekly for four consecutive weeks across three cohorts during the dose-escalation phase, followed by a dose of 2.0 × 106 cells/kg weekly for the dose-expansion phase. Adverse events, platelet counts, and changes in peripheral blood immunity were monitored and recorded throughout the administration and follow-up period. Ultimately, 12 (with an addition of three patients in the 2.0 × 106 cells/kg group due to dose-limiting toxicity) and six patients were enrolled in the dose-escalation and dose-expansion phase, respectively. Thirteen patients (13/18, 72.2%) experienced one or more treatment emergent adverse events. Serious adverse events occurred in four patients (4/18, 22.2%), including gastrointestinal hemorrhage (2/4), profuse menstruation (1/4), and acute myocardial infarction (1/4). The response rates were 41.7% in the dose-escalation phase (5/12, two received 1.0 × 106 cells/kg per week, and three received 2.0 × 106 cells/kg per week) and 50.0% (3/6) in the dose-expansion phase. The overall response rate was 44.4% (8/18) among all enrolled patients. To sum up, UC-MSCs are effective and well tolerated in treating refractory ITP (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04014166).

Intrathecal delivery of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells in traumatic spinal cord injury: Phase I trial.

Intrathecal delivery of autologous culture-expanded adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells (AD-MSC) could be utilized to treat traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). This Phase I trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03308565) included 10 patients with American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) grade A or B at the time of injury. The study's primary outcome was the safety profile, as captured by the nature and frequency of adverse events. Secondary outcomes included changes in sensory and motor scores, imaging, cerebrospinal fluid markers, and somatosensory evoked potentials. The manufacturing and delivery of the regimen were successful for all patients. The most commonly reported adverse events were headache and musculoskeletal pain, observed in 8 patients. No serious AEs were observed. At final follow-up, seven patients demonstrated improvement in AIS grade from the time of injection. In conclusion, the study met the primary endpoint, demonstrating that AD-MSC harvesting and administration were well-tolerated in patients with traumatic SCI.

A Phase I Dose-Escalation Clinical Trial to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Umbilical Cord-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in Knee Osteoarthritis.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common degenerative joint disease. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) are promising cell-based therapy for OA. However, there is still a need for additional randomized, dose-dependent studies to determine the optimal dose and tissue source of MSC for improved clinical outcomes. Here, we performed a dose-dependant evaluation of umbilical cord (UC)-derived MSC (Celllistem) in a murine model and in knee OA patients. For the preclinical study, a classical dose (200.000 cells) and a lower dose (50.000 cells) of Cellistem were intra-articularly injected into the mice knee joints. The results showed a dose efficacy response effect of Cellistem associated with a decreased inflammatory and degenerative response according to the Pritzker OARSI score. Following the same approach, the dose-escalation phase I clinical trial design included 3 sequential cohorts: low-dose group (2 × 106 cells), medium-dose group (20 × 106), and high-dose group (80 × 106). All the doses were safe, and no serious adverse events were reported. Nonetheless, 100% of the patients injected with the high-dose experienced injection-related swelling in the knee joint. According to WOMAC total outcomes, patients treated with all doses reported significant improvements in pain and function compared with baseline after 3 and 6 months. However, the improvements were higher in patients treated with both medium and low dose as compared to high dose. Therefore, our data demonstrate that the intra-articular injection of different doses of Cellistem is both safe and efficient, making it an interesting therapeutic alternative to treat mild and symptomatic knee OA patients. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03810521.

Mesenchymal stromal cells plus basiliximab improve the response of steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease as a second-line therapy: a multicentre, randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: For patients with steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (SR-aGVHD), effective second-line regimens are urgently needed. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have been used as salvage regimens for SR-aGVHD in the past. However, clinical trials and an overall understanding of the molecular mechanisms of MSCs combined with basiliximab for SR-aGVHD are limited, especially in haploidentical haemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HID HSCT). METHODS: The primary endpoint of this multicentre, randomized, controlled trial was the 4-week complete response (CR) rate of SR-aGVHD. A total of 130 patients with SR-aGVHD were assigned in a 1:1 randomization schedule to the MSC group (receiving basiliximab plus MSCs) or control group (receiving basiliximab alone) (NCT04738981). RESULTS: Most enrolled patients (96.2%) received HID HSCT. The 4-week CR rate of SR-aGVHD in the MSC group was obviously better than that in the control group (83.1% vs. 55.4%, P = 0.001). However, for the overall response rates at week 4, the two groups were comparable. More patients in the control group used ≥ 6 doses of basiliximab (4.6% vs. 20%, P = 0.008). We collected blood samples from 19 consecutive patients and evaluated MSC-derived immunosuppressive cytokines, including HO1, GAL1, GAL9, TNFIA6, PGE2, PDL1, TGF-ß and HGF. Compared to the levels before MSC infusion, the HO1 (P = 0.0072) and TGF-ß (P = 0.0243) levels increased significantly 1 day after MSC infusion. At 7 days after MSC infusion, the levels of HO1, GAL1, TNFIA6 and TGF-ß tended to increase; however, the differences were not statistically significant. Although the 52-week cumulative incidence of cGVHD in the MSC group was comparable to that in the control group, fewer patients in the MSC group developed cGVHD involving ≥3 organs (14.3% vs. 43.6%, P = 0.006). MSCs were well tolerated, no infusion-related adverse events (AEs) occurred and other AEs were also comparable between the two groups. However, patients with malignant haematological diseases in the MSC group had a higher 52-week disease-free survival rate than those in the control group (84.8% vs. 65.9%, P = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: For SR-aGVHD after allo-HSCT, especially HID HSCT, the combination of MSCs and basiliximab as the second-line therapy led to significantly better 4-week CR rates than basiliximab alone. The addition of MSCs not only did not increase toxicity but also provided a survival benefit.

Mesenchymal Stem Cell Extracellular Vesicles as a New Treatment Paradigm in Solid Abdominal Organ Transplantation: A Case Series.

Solid abdominal organ transplantation is fraught with variable rates of rejection and graft versus host disease (GVHD). We sought to determine the safety and efficacy of an advanced extracellular vesicle (EV) investigational product (IP) derived from mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) in the transplant patient population. Seven separate emergency investigational new drug (eNIDs) were filed with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the emergency treatment of rejection of an isolated intestinal graft (n = 2), liver allograft graft (n = 2), modified multivisceral graft (n = 3), and GVHD in isolated intestinal transplant patients (n = 2). Fifteen milliliters of IP was administered intravenously on Day 0, 2, 4, and this treatment cycle was repeated up to four times in each patient depending on the treatment protocol allowed by the FDA. Safety (adverse event reporting) and efficacy (clinical status, serologies, and histopathology) were evaluated. There were no adverse events related to IP. All patients had improvement in clinical symptoms within 24 h, improved serologic laboratory evaluation, improved pulmonary symptoms and dermatologic manifestations of GVHD, and complete histologic resolution of graft inflammation/rejection within 7 days of IP administration. Systemic use of a MSC-derived EV IP was successful in achieving histological clearance of intestinal, liver, and multivisceral graft inflammation, and skin and pulmonary manifestations of GVHD.

Dynamics of Sex Hormones in Men with Diabetes Mellitus After Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplant.

OBJECTIVES: Our goal was to determine levels of sex hormones in men with type 1 diabetes mellitus and type 2 diabetes mellitus after autologous mesenchymal stem cell transplant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined 10 male patients (32-56 years old) with type 1 diabetes mellitus and type 2 diabetes mellitus, whom we subsequently divided into 2 groups and examined. Group 1 comprised 5 male patients who received autologous mesenchymal stem cell transplant (cells were obtained from patient's iliac crest and cultured for 3-4 weeks) by intravenous infusion. Group 2 comprised 5 male patients (control group) who were on hypoglycemic tablet therapy or insulin therapy. The quantity of autologous mesenchymal stem cells infused was 95 × 106 to 97 × 106 cells. We analyzed levels of testosterone, luteinizing hormone, estradiol, and glycated hemoglobin in patients both before and 3 months after the autologous mesenchymal stem cell transplant procedure. RESULTS: In men with type 1 diabetes mellitus and type 2 diabetes mellitus, autologous mesenchymal stem cell transplant led to an increase in testosterone levels from 5.31 ± 2.12 to 6.33 ± 2.12 ng/mL (P = .82), a decrease in luteinizing hormone from 8.43 ± 1.25 to 5.94 ± 1.57 mIU/mL (P = .04), and a decrease in glycated hemoglobin from 9.45 ± 1.24% to 8.53 ± 1.08% (P = .25) after 3 months. The increase in testosterone in men with autologous mesenchymal stem cell transplant group of 6.33 ± 2.12 ng/mL was significant compared with men in the control group (3.9 ± 1.18 ng/mL; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Testosterone level increased and luteinizing hormone level decreased within 3 months after autologous mesenchymal stem cell transplant in men with diabetes mellitus.

Preclinical assessments of safety and tumorigenicity of very high doses of allogeneic human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells.

Human umbilical cord-mesenchymal stem cells (hUC-MSCs) have been widely investigated as a new therapeutic agent to treat injuries and inflammatory-mediated and autoimmune diseases. Previous studies have reported on the safety of low-dose infusion of hUC-MSCs, but information on the cell behaviour at higher doses and frequency of injection of the cells remains uncertain. The aim of the present study was to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of hUC-MSCs by Cytopeutics® (Selangor, Malaysia) from low to an extremely high dose in different monitoring periods in healthy BALB/c mice as well as assessing the tumorigenicity of the cells in B-NDG SCID immunocompromised mice. Umbilical cord from two healthy human newborns was obtained and the isolation of the hUC-MSCs was performed based on previous established method. Assessment of the cells at different doses of single or multiple administrations was performed on healthy BALB/c mice in dose range finding, sub-acute (7 d and 28 d) and sub-chronic periods (90 d). Tumorigenicity potential of Cytopeutics® hUC-MSCs was also evaluated on B-NDG immunocompromised mice for 26 wk. Single or multiple administrations of Cytopeutics® hUC-MSCs up to 40 × 106 cells per kilogramme of body weight (kg BW) were found to have no adverse effect in terms of clinical symptoms, haematology and other laboratory parameters, and histology examination in healthy BALB/c mice. hUC-MSCs were also found to reduce pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6 and TNF-α) in a dose-dependent manner. No sign of tumor formation was observed in B-NDG mice in the 26-wk tumorigenicity assessment. Single or multiple administration of allogenic Cytopeutics® hUC-MSCs was safe even at very high doses, is non-tumorigenic and did not cause adverse effects in mice throughout the evaluation periods. In addition, Cytopeutics® hUC-MSCs exhibited immunomodulatory effect in a dose-dependent manner.