Comparison of the Effectiveness of Baloxavir and Oseltamivir in Outpatients With Influenza B.

This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from a Japanese health insurance database to assess the effectiveness of baloxavir (n = 4822) for preventing severe events compared with oseltamivir (n = 10,523) in patients with influenza B. The primary endpoint was hospitalization incidence (Days 2-14). The secondary endpoints included intravenous antibacterial drug use, pneumonia hospitalization, heart failure hospitalization, inhalational oxygen requirement, and use of other anti-influenza drugs. The hospitalization incidence was significantly lower with baloxavir (0.15% vs. 0.37%; risk ratio: 2.48, 95% confidence interval: 1.13-5.43). Pneumonia and additional anti-influenza therapy were also less frequent with baloxavir, thus supporting its use. Trial Registration: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry Study ID: UMIN000051382.

Savolitinib conferred sensitivity in a patient with D1228H mutation-induced capmatinib-resistant MET exon 14 skipping mutated lung adenocarcinoma.

Traditionally, the D1228 E/G/H/N mutation has been thought to cause Type I MET-TKI resistance. We reported a 75-year-old female with non-small cell lung cancer harboring MET exon 14 skipping mutation, who developed acquired MET D1228H mutation induced by capmatinib treatment. Interestingly, the patient demonstrated marked response to second-line savolitinib treatment with the duration of response of 19 months and several additional metastatic lesions appeared. Pathological assessment of rebiopsy sample showed adenocarcinoma and targeted next-generation sequencing revealed the loss of MET D1228H mutation and presence of MET p.Y1230N mutation. In response, the treatment regimen was amended to include a daily administration of 60 mg of cabozantinib, which resulted in moderate size reduction of the tumours. The switch of resistance mutations indicated that different type Ib MET inhibitors may exhibit distinct mechanisms of resistance. We call for futher studies on resistance based on patient-derived pre-clinical models including patient-derived tumor-like cell clusters, patient-derived organoids, and patient-derived xenografts.

Detection of influenza A(H3N2) viruses with polymerase acidic subunit substitutions after and prior to baloxavir marboxil treatment during the 2022-2023 influenza season in Japan.

Baloxavir marboxil (baloxavir), approved as an anti-influenza drug in Japan in March 2018, can induce reduced therapeutic effectiveness due to PA protein substitutions. We assessed PA substitutions in clinical samples from influenza-infected children and adults pre- and post-baloxavir treatment, examining their impact on fever and symptom duration. During the 2022-2023 influenza season, the predominant circulating influenza subtype detected by cycling-probe RT-PCR was A(H3N2) (n = 234), with a minor circulation of A(H1N1)pdm09 (n = 10). Of the 234 influenza A(H3N2) viruses collected prior to baloxavir treatment, 2 (0.8%) viruses carry PA/I38T substitution. One virus was collected from a toddler and one from an adult, indicating the presence of viruses with reduced susceptibility to baloxavir, without prior exposure to the drug. Of the 54 paired influenza A(H3N2) viruses collected following baloxavir treatment, 8 (14.8%) viruses carried E23 K/G, or I38 M/T substitutions in PA. Variant calling through next-generation sequencing (NGS) showed varying proportions (6-100 %), a polymorphism and a mixture of PA/E23 K/G, and I38 M/T substitutions in the clinical samples. These eight viruses were obtained from children aged 7-14 years, with a median fever duration of 16.7 h and a median symptom duration of 93.7 h, which were similar to those of the wild type. However, the delayed viral clearance associated with the emergence of PA substitutions was observed. No substitutions conferring resistance to neuraminidase inhibitors were detected in 37 paired samples collected before and following oseltamivir treatment. These findings underscore the need for ongoing antiviral surveillance, informing public health strategies and clinical antiviral recommendations for seasonal influenza.

Capmatinib plus nazartinib in patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: This phase 1b/2 trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of capmatinib plus nazartinib in patients with advanced EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: In phase 1b, patients with progression on first-/second-generation EGFR-TKIs received escalating doses of capmatinib 200-400 mg bid plus nazartinib 50-150 mg qd. Once the MTD/RP2D was declared, phase 2 commenced with patient enrollment into groups according to mutation status and prior lines of treatment: group 1 (fasted; EGFR-TKI resistant; 1-3 prior lines; EGFRL858R/ex19del; any T790M/MET); group 2 (fasted; EGFR-TKI naïve; 0-2 prior lines; de novo T790M+; any MET); group 3 (fasted; treatment-naïve; EGFRL858R/ex19del; T790M-; any MET); group 4 (with food; 0-2 prior lines; EGFRL858R/ex19del; any T790M/MET). Primary endpoints in phase 2 were investigator-assessed overall response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1 (groups 1-3), safety, and tolerability of the combination with food (group 4). Efficacy was assessed by T790M and MET status for a subgroup of patients. RESULTS: The RP2D was capmatinib 400 mg bid plus nazartinib 100 mg qd. In phase 2 (n = 144), the ORR was 28.8 %, 33.3 %, 61.7 %, and 42.9 % in groups 1 (n = 52), 2 (n = 3), 3 (n = 47), and 4 (n = 42), respectively. In group 1 +phase 1b RP2D, the ORR was 45.8 %, 26.2 %, 37.9 %, and 32.4 % in MET+ (n = 24), MET- (n = 42), T790M+ (n = 29), and T790M- (n = 34) patients. Most common any-grade treatment-related adverse events (≥25 %; n = 144) were peripheral edema (54.9 %), nausea (41.7 %), diarrhea (34.0 %), and maculopapular rash (25.0 %). CONCLUSION: Capmatinib plus nazartinib showed antitumor activity in patients with EGFR-TKI-resistant, EGFR-mutated NSCLC. The overall safety profile was acceptable. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02335944.

Study on the effects of rapamycin and the mTORC1/2 dual inhibitor OSI-027 on the metabolism of colon cancer cells based on UPLC-MS/MS metabolomics.

mTORC1/2 dual inhibitors may be more effective than mTORC1 inhibitor rapamycin. However, their metabolic impacts on colon cancer cells remain unexplored. We conducted a comparative analysis of the anti-proliferative effects of rapamycin and the novel OSI-027 in colon cancer cells HCT-116, evaluating their metabolic influences through ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). Our results demonstrate that OSI-027 more effectively inhibits colon cancer cell proliferation than rapamycin. Additionally, we identified nearly 600 metabolites from the spectra, revealing significant differences in metabolic patterns between cells treated with OSI-027 and rapamycin. Through VIP value screening, we pinpointed crucial metabolites contributing to these distinctions. For inhibiting glycolysis and reducing glucose consumption, OSI-027 was likely to be more potent than rapamycin. For amino acids metabolism, although OSI-027 has a broad effect as rapamycin, their effects in degrees were not exactly the same. These findings address the knowledge gap regarding mTORC1/2 dual inhibitors and lay a foundation for their further development and research.

Indirect comparison of capmatinib treatment from GEOMETRY mono-1 trial to SOC in German patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC harboring METex14 skipping mutations.

BACKGROUND: This study provides comparative evidence of the selective MET inhibitor capmatinib versus standard of care (SOC) in first-line (1 L) and second-line (2 L) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with METex14 mutations in German routine care. METHODS: SOC data were collected from German routine care via retrospective chart review. Analyses were conducted as naive and propensity score adjusted (PSA) comparisons to capmatinib-treated patients within the GEOMETRY mono-1 trial. Effectiveness endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), time to CNS progression (CNSprog), and exploratory safety endpoints. RESULTS: The SOC arm included 119 patients in 1 L and 46 in 2 L versus 60 patients in 1 L and 81 in 2 L treated with capmatinib, with balanced baseline characteristics after PSA. In 1 L, the naive comparison showed a significant benefit of capmatinib versus SOC for OS (median: 25.49 vs 14.59 months; HR 0.58; 95 % CI 0.39-0.87; P = 0.011), PFS (median: 12.45 vs 5.03 months; HR: 0.44; 95 % CI: 0.31-0.63; P < 0.001), and ORR (event rate: 68.3 vs 26.9 %; RR 2.54; 95 % CI 1.80-3.58; P < 0.001). In 2 L, OS, PFS, and ORR showed positive trends favoring capmatinib over SOC. Capmatinib treatment in the 1 L and 2 L led to significant benefit in CNSprog. PSA analyses showed consistent results to naive analysis. Exploratory safety endpoints indicated a manageable safety profile for capmatinib. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates the important role of capmatinib in providing robust clinically meaningful benefit to patients with NSCLC harboring METex14 mutations and its significant role in preventing the development of brain metastases.

Duration of fever in children infected with influenza A(H1N1)pdm09, A(H3N2) or B virus and treated with baloxavir marboxil, oseltamivir, laninamivir, or zanamivir in Japan during the 2012-2013 and 2019-2020 influenza seasons.

We compared the duration of fever in children infected with A(H1N1)pdm09, A(H3N2), or influenza B viruses following treatment with baloxavir marboxil (baloxavir) or neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) (oseltamivir, zanamivir, or laninamivir). This observational study was conducted at 10 outpatient clinics across 9 prefectures in Japan during the 2012-2013 and 2019-2020 influenza seasons. Patients with influenza rapid antigen test positive were treated with one of four anti-influenza drugs. The type/subtype of influenza viruses were identified from MDCK or MDCK SIAT1 cell-grown samples using two-step real-time PCR. Daily self-reported body temperature after treatment were used to evaluate the duration of fever by treatment group and various underlying factors. Among 1742 patients <19 years old analyzed, 452 (26.0%) were A(H1N1)pdm09, 827 (48.0%) A(H3N2), and 463 (26.0%) influenza B virus infections. Among fours treatment groups, baloxavir showed a shorter median duration of fever compared to oseltamivir in univariate analysis for A(H1N1)pdm09 virus infections (baloxavir, 22.0 h versus oseltamivir, 26.7 h, P < 0.05; laninamivir, 25.5 h, and zanamivir, 25.0 h). However, this difference was not significant in multivariable analyses. For A(H3N2) virus infections, there were no statistically significant differences observed (20.3, 21.0, 22.0, and 19.0 h) uni- and multivariable analyses. For influenza B, baloxavir shortened the fever duration by approximately 15 h than NAIs (20.3, 35.0, 34.3, and 34.1 h), as supported by uni- and multivariable analyses. Baloxavir seems to have comparable clinical effectiveness with NAIs on influenza A but can be more effective for treating pediatric influenza B virus infections than NAIs.

KRAS-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) therapy based on tepotinib and omeprazole combination.

BACKGROUND: KRAS-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) shows a relatively low response rate to chemotherapy, immunotherapy and KRAS-G12C selective inhibitors, leading to short median progression-free survival, and overall survival. The MET receptor tyrosine kinase (c-MET), the cognate receptor of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), was reported to be overexpressed in KRAS-mutant lung cancer cells leading to tumor-growth in anchorage-independent conditions. METHODS: Cell viability assay and synergy analysis were carried out in native, sotorasib and trametinib-resistant KRAS-mutant NSCLC cell lines. Colony formation assays and Western blot analysis were also performed. RNA isolation from tumors of KRAS-mutant NSCLC patients was performed and KRAS and MET mRNA expression was determined by real-time RT-qPCR. In vivo studies were conducted in NSCLC (NCI-H358) cell-derived tumor xenograft model. RESULTS: Our research has shown promising activity of omeprazole, a V-ATPase-driven proton pump inhibitor with potential anti-cancer properties, in combination with the MET inhibitor tepotinib in KRAS-mutant G12C and non-G12C NSCLC cell lines, as well as in G12C inhibitor (AMG510, sotorasib) and MEK inhibitor (trametinib)-resistant cell lines. Moreover, in a xenograft mouse model, combination of omeprazole plus tepotinib caused tumor growth regression. We observed that the combination of these two drugs downregulates phosphorylation of the glycolytic enzyme enolase 1 (ENO1) and the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP) 5/6 in the H358 KRAS G12C cell line, but not in the H358 sotorasib resistant, indicating that the effect of the combination could be independent of ENO1. In addition, we examined the probability of recurrence-free survival and overall survival in 40 early lung adenocarcinoma patients with KRAS G12C mutation stratified by KRAS and MET mRNA levels. Significant differences were observed in recurrence-free survival according to high levels of KRAS mRNA expression. Hazard ratio (HR) of recurrence-free survival was 7.291 (p = 0.014) for high levels of KRAS mRNA expression and 3.742 (p = 0.052) for high MET mRNA expression. CONCLUSIONS: We posit that the combination of the V-ATPase inhibitor omeprazole plus tepotinib warrants further assessment in KRAS-mutant G12C and non G12C cell lines, including those resistant to the covalent KRAS G12C inhibitors.

Comparative Effectiveness of Baloxavir Marboxil and Oseltamivir Treatment in Reducing Household Transmission of Influenza: A Post Hoc Analysis of the BLOCKSTONE Trial.

BACKGROUND: The transmission of influenza virus in households, especially by children, is a major route of infection. Prior studies suggest that timely antiviral treatment of ill cases may reduce infection in household contacts. The aim of the study was to compare the effects of oseltamivir (OTV) and baloxavir marboxil (BXM) treatment of index cases on the secondary attack rate (SAR) of influenza within household. METHODS: A post hoc analysis was done in BLOCKSTONE trial-a placebo-controlled, double-blinded post-exposure prophylaxis of BXM. Data were derived from the laboratory-confirmed index cases' household contacts who received placebo in the trial and also from household members who did not participate in the trial but completed illness questionnaires. To assess the SAR of household members, multivariate analyses adjusted for factors including age, vaccination status, and household size were performed and compared between contacts of index cases treated with BXM or OTV. RESULTS: In total, 185 index cases (116 treated with BXM and 69 treated with OTV) and 410 household contacts (201 from trial, 209 by questionnaire) were included. The Poisson regression modeling showed that the SAR in household contacts of index cases treated with BXM and OTV was 10.8% and 18.5%, respectively; the adjusted relative reduction in SAR was 41.8% (95% confidence interval: 1.0%-65.7%, p = 0.0456) greater with BXM than OTV. Similar reductions were found in contacts from the trial and those included by questionnaire. CONCLUSION: BXM treatment of index cases appeared to result in a greater reduction in secondary household transmission than OTV treatment.

Unfavorable response to capmatinib for MET exon14 skipping after first-line osimertinib in a patient with EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma: A case report and literature review.

MET exon14 skipping mutations (METex14s) are rarely reported as a potential resistance mechanism to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The efficacy of targeted therapy against METex14s emerging after osimertinib resistance is uncertain. Herein, we report a case of EGFR-mutated metastatic lung adenocarcinoma in which METex14 was detected in a re-biopsy upon first-line osimertinib resistance. The patient received capmatinib monotherapy as third-line therapy, which was ineffective, followed by an exceptional response to salvage therapy with afatinib. This report highlights the heterogeneity of EGFR-TKI resistance and that targeting rare resistance mechanisms remains challenging.

The efficacy of lamotrigine in bipolar disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To provide up-to-date clinical guidance on the efficacy of lamotrigine in bipolar disorder (BD). METHODS: Eligible studies were identified during a systematic literature search according to PRISMA-guidelines. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies that quantitatively assessed lamotrigine's efficacy in BD. We divided the included studies into three groups: 1. acute treatment of depression, 2. acute treatment of mania and hypomania, and 3. maintenance treatment. Analyses were stratified by control group (placebo vs active comparator) and treatment strategy (monotherapy vs add-on treatment). RESULTS: We included 20 RCTs (n = 1166 lamotrigine users) and 20 cohort studies (n = 11,141 lamotrigine users). Twenty-four of these studies were included in meta-analyses. During depressive episodes, greater decreases in depressive symptomatology were associated with initiation of lamotrigine as add-on treatment than with placebo (SMD -0.30 [95% CI = -0.51, -0.10], df = 3, p = 0.004). Decreases in depressive symptomatology did not differ significantly between lamotrigine and the active comparator (SMD -0.28 [95% CI = -1.06, 0.50], df = 3, p = 0.488). As a maintenance treatment, lamotrigine was associated with a significantly lower relapse/recurrence rate than placebo (risk ratio (RR) 0.84 [95% CI = 0.71, 0.99], df = 2, p = 0.037). Relapse/recurrence rates did not differ significantly between lamotrigine and lithium (RR 1.06 [95% CI = 0.89, 1.25], df = 2, p = 0.513). A qualitative assessment of high-quality register-based studies found that lamotrigine was associated with lower hospital admission rates than other commonly used treatment regimes. CONCLUSIONS: There is substantial evidence for the efficacy of lamotrigine in BD, specifically as add-on treatment during acute depressive episodes and as maintenance treatment for preventing relapse and recurrence.

Dose finding for ZSP1601 in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis using population pharmacokinetics and exposure-response approach.

INTRODUCTION: ZSP1601 is a novel pan-phosphodiesterase inhibitor developed in China specifically for the treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). AIM: The aim is to develop a population pharmacokinetic (pop PK) model for ZSP1601 by integrating data from two clinical studies. This undertaking aims to deepen our understanding of the clinical factors that influence ZSP1601 exposure while simultaneously investigating exposure-response (ER) relationships related to efficacy and safety. The goal is to guide formulating optimal dosage strategies in the subsequent phases of clinical trials. METHODS: Analysis of pooled concentration-time data from 95 subjects, with 2647 observations from two clinical trials involving healthy volunteers and NAFLD patients, employed a nonlinear mixed-effects modeling approach to characterize ZSP1601 pharmacokinetics. Covariate impact on ZSP1601 pharmacokinetics was investigated, and relationships between ZSP1601 exposure, efficacy and safety endpoints were explored. RESULTS: A two-compartment model featuring sequential zero-order then first-order absorption and first-order elimination effectively described ZSP1601's pharmacokinetic profile. Covariate analyses identified body weight as a statistically significant factor affecting drug central volume, while FED (food consumption) influenced absorption rate constant and duration. The Sigmoid Emax model aptly captured exposure-response relationships for ALT (alanine aminotransferase), AST (aspartate aminotransferase), and LFC (liver fat content) percentage changes relative to baseline and ZSP1601 exposure levels (AUCss) on the 29th day. ZSP1601 exposure levels (Cmax1) exhibited a significant exposure-response relationship with headaches (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The PopPK model and ER analysis, based on available data, comprehensively characterizes ZSP1601's pharmacokinetic, safety and efficacy profile, aiding informed decisions regarding dosage selection for the drug's complete developmental trajectory. The exposure-response (ER) analysis yields quantitative insights into the optimal balance of efficacy and safety within different dosage regimens for patient administration. In light of these findings, the dose regimen of 100 mg administered twice daily is proposed for subsequent clinical investigations.

Exploring new mechanisms of Imeglimin in diabetes treatment: Amelioration of mitochondrial dysfunction.

With the increasing prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), it has become critical to identify effective treatment strategies. In recent years, the novel oral hypoglycaemic drug Imeglimin has attracted much attention in the field of diabetes treatment. The mechanisms of its therapeutic action are complex and are not yet fully understood by current research. Current evidence suggests that pancreatic ß-cells, liver, and skeletal muscle are the main organs in which Imeglimin lowers blood glucose levels and that it acts mainly by targeting mitochondrial function, thereby inhibiting hepatic gluconeogenesis, enhancing insulin sensitivity, promoting pancreatic ß-cell function, and regulating energy metabolism. There is growing evidence that the drug also has a potentially volatile role in the treatment of diabetic complications, including metabolic cardiomyopathy, diabetic vasculopathy, and diabetic neuroinflammation. According to available clinical studies, its efficacy and safety profile are more evident than other hypoglycaemic agents, and it has synergistic effects when combined with other antidiabetic drugs, and also has potential in the treatment of T2DM-related complications. This review aims to shed light on the latest research progress in the treatment of T2DM with Imeglimin, thereby providing clinicians and researchers with the latest insights into Imeglimin as a viable option for the treatment of T2DM.

Co-delivery of Plinabulin and Tirapazamine boosts anti-tumor efficacy by simultaneously destroying tumor blood vessels and killing tumor cells.

It is imperative to optimize chemotherapy for heightened anti-tumor therapeutic efficacy. Unrestrained tumor cell proliferation and sustained angiogenesis are pivotal for cancer progression. Plinabulin, a vascular disrupting agent, selectively destroys tumor blood vessels. Tirapazamine (TPZ), a hypoxia-activated prodrug, intensifies cytotoxicity in diminishing oxygen levels within tumor cells. Despite completing Phase III clinical trials, both agents exhibited modest treatment efficiency due to dose-limiting toxicity. In this study, we employed methoxy poly(ethylene glycol)-b-poly(D,L-lactide) (mPEG-b-PDLLA) to co-deliver Plinabulin and TPZ to the tumor site, concurrently disrupting blood vessels and eliminating tumor cells, addressing both symptoms and the root cause of tumor progression. Plinabulin was converted into a prodrug with esterase response (PSM), and TPZ was synthesized into a hexyl chain-containing derivative (TPZHex) for effective co-delivery. PSM and TPZHex were co-encapsulated with mPEG-b-PDLLA, forming nanodrugs (PT-NPs). At the tumor site, PT-NPs responded to esterase overexpression, releasing Plinabulin, disrupting blood vessels, and causing nutritional and oxygen deficiency. TPZHex was activated in response to increased hypoxia, killing tumor cells. In treating 4T1 tumors, PT-NPs demonstrated enhanced therapeutic efficacy, achieving a 92.9 % tumor suppression rate and a 20 % cure rate. This research presented an innovative strategy to enhance synergistic efficacy and reduce toxicity in combination chemotherapy.

Design, Synthesis, Formulation, and Bioevaluation of Trisubstituted Triazines as Highly Selective mTOR Inhibitors for the Treatment of Human Breast Cancer.

The aberrant activation of the PI3K/mTOR signaling pathway is implicated in various human cancers. Thus, the development of inhibitors targeting mTOR has attracted considerable attention. In this study, we used a structure-based drug design strategy to discover a highly potent and kinase-selective mTOR inhibitor 24 (PT-88), which demonstrated an mTOR inhibitory IC50 value of 1.2 nM without obvious inhibition against another 195 kinases from the kinase profiling screening. PT-88 displayed selective inhibition against MCF-7 cells (IC50: 0.74 µM) with high biosafety against normal cells, in which autophagy induced by mTOR inhibition was implicated. After successful encapsulation in a lipodisc formulation, PT-88 demonstrated favorable pharmacokinetic and biosafety profiles and exerted a large antitumor effect in an MCF-7 subcutaneous bearing nude mice model. Our study shows the discovery of a highly selective mTOR inhibitor using a structure-based drug discovery strategy and provides a promising antitumor candidate for future study and development.

Assessment of CYP-Mediated Drug Interactions for Enasidenib Based on a Cocktail Study in Patients with Relapse or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome.

As a selective and potent inhibitor targeting the isocitrate dehydrogenase-2 (IDH2) mutant protein, enasidenib obtained approval from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2017 for adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with an IDH2 mutation. In vitro investigations demonstrated that enasidenib affects various drug metabolic enzymes and transporters. This current investigation aimed to assess enasidenib on the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of CYP substrates, including dextromethorphan (CYP2D6 probe drug), flurbiprofen (CYP2C9 probe drug), midazolam (CYP3A4 probe drug), omeprazole (CYP2C19 probe drug), and pioglitazone (CYP2C8 probe drug), in patients with AML or myelodysplastic syndrome. Results showed that following the co-administration of enasidenib (100 mg, once daily) for 28 days, the PK parameters AUC(0-∞) and Cmax of dextromethorphan increased by 1.37 (90% confidence interval (CI): 0.96, 1.96) and 1.24 (90% CI: 0.94, 1.65)-fold, respectively, compared to dextromethorphan alone. For flurbiprofen, these parameters increased by 1.14 (90%CI: 1.01, 1.29) and 0.97 (90% CI 0.86, 1.08)-fold, respectively, when compared to flurbiprofen alone. Conversely, midazolam exhibited decreases to 0.57 (90% CI 0.34, 0.97) and 0.77 (90% CI 0.39, 1.53)-fold, respectively, in comparison to midazolam alone. The parameters for omeprazole increased by 1.86 (90% CI: 1.33, 2.60) and 1.47 (0.93, 2.31)-fold, respectively, compared to omeprazole alone, while those for pioglitazone decreased to 0.80 (90% CI: 0.62, 1.03) and 0.87 (90% CI: 0.65, 1.16)-fold, respectively, in comparison to pioglitazone alone. These findings provide valuable insights into dose recommendations concerning drugs acting as substrates of CYP2D6, CYP2C9, CYP3A4, CYP2C19, and CYP2C8 when administered concurrently with enasidenib.

Interaction and antiviral treatment of coinfection between SARS-CoV-2 and influenza in vitro.

BACKGROUND: The pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has lasted for three years. Coinfection with seasonal influenza may occur resulting in more severe diseases. The interaction between these two viruses for infection and the effect of antiviral treatment remains unclear. METHODS: A SARS-CoV-2 and influenza H1N1 coinfection model on Calu-3 cell line was established, upon which the simultaneous and sequential coinfection was evaluated by comparing the viral load. The efficacy of molnupiravir and baloxavir against individual virus and coinfection were also studied. RESULTS: The replication of SARS-CoV-2 was significantly interfered when the influenza virus was infected simultaneously or in advance (p < 0.05). On the contrary, the replication of the influenza virus was not affected by the SARS-CoV-2. Molnupiravir monotherapy had significant inhibitory effect on SARS-CoV-2 when the concentration reached to 6.25 µM but did not show any significant anti-influenza activity. Baloxavir was effective against influenza within the dosage range and showed significant effect of anti-SARS-CoV-2 at 16 µM. In the treatment of coinfection, molnupiravir had significant effect for SARS-CoV-2 from 6.25 µM to 100 µM and inhibited H1N1 at 100 µM (p < 0.05). The tested dosage range of baloxavir can inhibit H1N1 significantly (p < 0.05), while at the highest concentration of baloxavir did not further inhibit SARS-CoV-2, and the replication of SARS-CoV-2 significantly increased in lower concentrations. Combination treatment can effectively inhibit influenza H1N1 and SARS-CoV-2 replication during coinfection. Compared with molnupiravir or baloxavir monotherapy, combination therapy was more effective in less dosage to inhibit the replication of both viruses. CONCLUSIONS: In coinfection, the replication of SARS-CoV-2 would be interfered by influenza H1N1. Compared with molnupiravir or baloxavir monotherapy, treatment with a combination of molnupiravir and baloxavir should be considered for early treatment in patients with SARS-CoV-2 and influenza coinfection.

Discovery of baloxavir sodium as a novel anti-CCHFV inhibitor: Biological evaluation of in vitro and in vivo.

Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus (CCHFV) is a highly pathogenic bunyavirus with a fatality rate of up to 40%. Currently, there are no licensed antiviral drugs for the treatment of CCHF; thus, the World Health Organization (WHO) listed the disease as a priority. A unique viral transcription initiation mechanism called "cap-snatching" is shared by influenza viruses and bunyaviruses. Thus, we tested whether baloxavir (an FDA-approved anti-influenza drug that targets the "cap-snatching" mechanism) could inhibit CCHFV infection. In cell culture, baloxavir acid effectively inhibited CCHFV infection and targeted CCHFV RNA transcription/replication. However, it has weak oral bioavailability. Baloxavir marboxil (the oral prodrug of baloxavir) failed to protect mice against a lethal dose challenge of CCHFV. To solve this problem, baloxavir sodium was synthesized owing to its enhanced aqueous solubility and pharmacokinetic properties. It consistently and significantly improved survival rates and decreased tissue viral loads. This study identified baloxavir sodium as a novel scaffold structure and mechanism of anti-CCHF compound, providing a promising new strategy for clinical treatment of CCHF after further optimization.

Somatic gene mutation patterns and burden influence outcomes with enasidenib in relapsed/refractory IDH2-mutated AML.

Limited treatment options are available for patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (R/R AML). We recently reported results from the phase 3 IDHENTIFY trial (NCT02577406) showing improved response rates and event-free survival with enasidenib monotherapy compared with conventional care regimens (CCR) in heavily pretreated, older patients with late-stage R/R AML bearing IDH2 mutations. Here we investigated the prognostic impact of mutational burden and different co-mutation patterns at study entry within the predominant IDH2 variant subclasses, IDH2-R140 and IDH2-R172. The prognostic relevance of these variants is well documented in newly diagnosed AML, but data are lacking in R/R AML. In this large R/R AML patient cohort, targeted next-generation sequencing at baseline (screening) revealed distinct co-mutation patterns and mutational burden between subgroups bearing different IDH2 variants: variant IDH2-R140 was associated with greater mutational burden and was enriched predominantly with poor-risk mutations, including FLT3, RUNX1, and NRAS, while variant IDH2-R172 was associated with lower mutational burden and was preferentially co-mutated with DNMT3A. In multivariable analyses, RAS and RTK pathway mutations were significantly associated with decreased overall survival, after adjusting for treatment arm, IDH2 variant, and mutational burden. Importantly, enasidenib-mediated survival benefit was more pronounced in patients with IDH2-R172 variants.