RESUMO
PROBLEM: Aggressive behavior is common on psychiatric inpatient units. Seclusion and restraint interventions to manage patients' aggressive behavior may have the consequence of being traumatizing for patients. Pediatric psychiatric patients' perspective on the use of seclusion and restraint interventions is not present in the literature. METHODS: This hermeneutic nursing research study asked the question, "How might we understand children's experiences of seclusion and restraints on an inpatient psychiatric unit?" Four past pediatric psychiatric inpatients shared their hospitalization experiences that occurred within the previous year when they were 10 years old. The texts of the research interviews were compared to Attachment Theory for a deeper understanding of the meaning of the message. FINDINGS: Participants commonly described experiences with seclusion and restraints as feeling trapped and alone in a dark room. They recommended the nurses step into the room with them to help them heal. Interpretively, the rooms on inpatient units could be considered as actual and metaphorical spaces of possible harm or healing. CONCLUSION: The participant's voices expand understanding of nurse's use of discernment at the doorway of a patient room to ensure the most therapeutic care is provided to the patient in these spaces through a secure nurse-patient relationship.
Assuntos
Agressão , Pacientes Internados , Isolamento de Pacientes , Restrição Física , Humanos , Agressão/psicologia , Criança , Pacientes Internados/psicologia , Feminino , Masculino , Isolamento de Pacientes/psicologia , Enfermagem Psiquiátrica , Unidade Hospitalar de Psiquiatria , Relações Enfermeiro-Paciente , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Pesquisa QualitativaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: De-escalation is often advocated to reduce harm associated with violence and use of restrictive interventions, but there is insufficient understanding of factors that influence de-escalation behaviour in practice. For the first time, using behaviour change and implementation science methodology, this paper aims to identify the drivers that will enhance de-escalation in acute inpatient and psychiatric intensive care mental health settings. METHODS: Secondary analysis of 46 qualitative interviews with ward staff (n = 20) and patients (n = 26) informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework. RESULTS: Capabilities for de-escalation included knowledge (impact of trauma on memory and self-regulation and the aetiology and experience of voice hearing) and skills (emotional self-regulation, distress validation, reducing social distance, confirming autonomy, setting limits and problem-solving). Opportunities for de-escalation were limited by dysfunctional risk management cultures/ relationships between ward staff and clinical leadership, and a lack of patient involvement in safety maintenance. Motivation to engage in de-escalation was limited by negative emotion associated with moral formulations of patients and internal attributions for behaviour. CONCLUSION: In addition to training that enhances knowledge and skills, interventions to enhance de-escalation should target ward and organisational cultures, as well as making fundamental changes to the social and physical structure of inpatient mental health wards. Psychological interventions targeting negative emotion in staff are needed to increase motivation. This paper provides a new evidence-based framework of indicative changes that will enhance de-escalation in adult acute mental health inpatient and PICU settings.
Assuntos
Agressão , Pacientes Internados , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Humanos , Masculino , Agressão/psicologia , Feminino , Adulto , Pacientes Internados/psicologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transtornos Mentais/psicologia , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Unidade Hospitalar de Psiquiatria , Atitude do Pessoal de SaúdeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The Safewards model aims to reduce conflict and use of containment on psychiatric wards. To evaluate the implementation of Safewards and understand why it is effective in some settings but not in others, it is important to assess the level of implementation fidelity. To do this, the Safewards Fidelity Checklist (SFC) is often used, which focuses on objective visual observations of interventions but does not include patient responsiveness. The latter is a key indicator of implementation fidelity and includes engagement, relevance, acceptability and usefulness. The aim of the present study was to investigate the fidelity of Safewards implementation on an acute psychiatric ward from the perspective of patient responsiveness. METHOD: The study was conducted on a ward for patients with mainly affective disorders. To assess the general level of fidelity the SFC was used together with a detailed ward walkthrough. Ten patients were interviewed with a focus on patient responsiveness to each of the seven interventions implemented on the ward. Data were analysed using qualitative descriptive analysis. RESULTS: The findings indicate high implementation fidelity, which was reflected in the SFC assessment, walkthrough and patient responsiveness. Patients gave examples of improvements that had happened over time or of the ward being better than other wards. They felt respected, less alone, hopeful and safe. They also described supporting fellow patients and taking responsibility for the ward climate. However, some patients were unfamiliar with a ward where so much communication was expected. Several suggestions were made about improving Safewards. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms previous research that patient responsiveness is an important factor for achieving fidelity in a prevention programme. The patients' descriptions of the acceptability, relevance and usefulness of the specific interventions reflected to a high degree the objective visual observations made by means of the SFC and ward walkthrough. Patient engagement was demonstrated by several suggestions about how to adapt the interventions. There is potential to obtain valuable input from patients when adapting Safewards in practice. This study also presents many examples of practical work with these interventions and the effects it can have on patients' experiences of care.
Assuntos
Unidade Hospitalar de Psiquiatria , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Lista de Checagem , Entrevistas como Assunto , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Transtornos Mentais/psicologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Patient's and therapist's expectations are considered an important factor influencing placebo response in experimental and therapeutic settings. Nevertheless, the placebo effects of common neurological facilitators that promote treatment efficacy have not been explored. In the present study we examined the estimations of patients, therapists, and staff members, regarding their treatment type and assessed their influence on the facilitating effects of oxytocin. METHODS: Patients (N = 87) were randomized and double-blindly allocated to receive either oxytocin or placebo, twice daily for a period of four weeks, as part of a larger randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Patient's, therapist's and staff's expectations were assessed based on their estimation of treatment type (agent or placebo). Multilevel modeling and univariate and multivariate regression analysis were performed to assess the effects of patient's, therapist's, and staff's estimations on treatment outcome beyond the effects of treatment type. RESULTS: Staff's, therapist's, and patient's estimations were significantly associated with treatment outcomes. Nevertheless, only therapist's and patient's estimations significantly predicted improvement beyond actual administration, with therapist's and patient's estimations associated with improvement in trait anxiety (STAI-T, B=-1.80, p < .05, and B=-2.02, p < .05, respectively); therapist's estimations were associated with improvement in general distress (OQ-45, B=-3.71, p < .05), and patient's estimations were associated with symptom relief (HSCL-11, B=-0.13, p < .05). Overall, patient's estimations had a higher relative contribution to treatment success, with standardized coefficients across scales ranging from - 0.06 to -0.26. CONCLUSIONS: The neurobiological factors that promote treatment success are also influenced by patient's and therapist's expectations. Future studies should consider these effects when examining their impact in inpatient settings.
Assuntos
Pacientes Internados , Ocitocina , Efeito Placebo , Humanos , Ocitocina/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Feminino , Método Duplo-Cego , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento , Unidade Hospitalar de Psiquiatria , Transtornos Mentais/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Adulto Jovem , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Ansiedade/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
Overnight observations of mental health inpatients have been criticised for interrupting inpatients' sleep and potentially undermining recovery. No studies have examined the perceptions of mental health nurses who complete overnight observations, limiting key information necessary to guide improvements. This study aims to understand mental health nurses' perceptions on overnight observations and views on practice re-evaluations, as well as assess whether nurses' perceptions align with inpatients as reported in previous research. To fulfil the aims ten mental health nurses working on mental health inpatient units engaged in semi-structured interviews which were analysed using Content Analysis. Nine themes were identified and grouped into three categories: (1) staff and inpatient experiences, (2) impacts on treatment, recovery, and risk management, and (3) opinions on change. Majority of participants were critical of overnight observations, describing their negative impacts on inpatients' sleep and wellbeing. This aligns with previously reported inpatient views. There is scope for reassessment on how overnight observations are conducted to promote inpatients' sleep, recovery, and safety.
Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Pacientes Internados , Enfermagem Psiquiátrica , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Humanos , Adulto , Pacientes Internados/psicologia , Feminino , Masculino , Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem Hospitalar/psicologia , Transtornos Mentais/psicologia , Transtornos Mentais/enfermagem , Unidade Hospitalar de Psiquiatria , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: As an emerging infectious disease with a heterogenous and uncertain transmission pattern, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has created a catastrophe in healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and posed a significant challenge to infection control practices (ICPs) in healthcare settings. While the unique characteristics of psychiatric patients and clinical settings may make the implementation of ICPs difficult, evidence is lacking for compliance with ICPs among healthcare workers (HCWs) in a psychiatric setting during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A cross-sectional multi-method study based on participant unobtrusive observation coupled with the completion of a self-administered ICP survey was conducted to assess compliance with ICPs among HCWs in a psychiatric inpatient ward in a regional hospital. An online checklist, called eRub, was used to record the performance of HCWs in hand hygiene (HH) and other essential ICPs. Furthermore, a well-validated questionnaire (i.e., Compliance with Standard Precautions Scale, CSPS) was used to collect the participants' self-reported ICP compliance for later comparison. RESULTS: A total of 2,670 ICP opportunities were observed from January to April 2020. The overall compliance rate was 42.6%. HCWs exhibited satisfactory compliance to the wearing of mask (91.2%) and the handling of clinical waste (87.5%); suboptimal compliance to the handling of sharp objects (67.7%) and linen (72.7%); and poor compliance to HH (3.3%), use of gloves (40.9%), use of personal protective equipment (20%), and disinfection of used surface/area (0.4%). The compliance rates of the nurses and support staff to HH were significantly different (χ2 = 123.25, p < 0.001). In the self-reported survey, the overall compliance rate for ICPs was 64.6%. CONCLUSION: The compliance of HCWs in a psychiatric inpatient ward to ICPs during the COVID-19 pandemic ranged from poor to suboptimal. This result was alarming. Revisions of current ICP guidelines and policies that specifically target barriers in psychiatric settings will be necessary.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Pessoal de Saúde , Controle de Infecções , Autorrelato , Humanos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Masculino , SARS-CoV-2 , Feminino , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Higiene das Mãos/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Unidade Hospitalar de Psiquiatria , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
Safewards reduces conflict and containment on adult inpatient wards but there is limited research exploring the model in Children and Young People (CYP) mental health services. We investigated whether Safewards can be successfully implemented on twenty CYP wards across England. A process and outcomes evaluation was employed, utilizing the Integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Sciences (i-PARiHS) framework. Existing knowledge and use of Safewards was recorded via a self-report benchmarking exercise, verified during visits. Implementation of the 10 Safewards components on each ward was recorded using the Safewards Organizational Fidelity measure. Data from 11 surveys and 17 interviews with ward staff and four interviews with project workers were subject to thematic analysis and mapped against the four i-PARiHS constructs. Twelve of the 20 wards implemented at least half of the Safewards interventions in 12 months, with two wards delivering all 10 interventions. Facilitators and barriers are described. Results demonstrated Safewards is acceptable to a range of CYP services. Whilst implementation was hindered by difficulties outlined, wards with capacity were able and willing to implement the interventions. Results support the commissioning of a study to evaluate the implementation and outcomes of Safewards in CYP units.
Assuntos
Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Criança , Adolescente , Inglaterra , Masculino , Feminino , Unidade Hospitalar de Psiquiatria/organização & administraçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Aggression and negative activation in mental health inpatient units pose significant challenges for both patients and staff with severe physical and psychological ramifications. The Safewards model is an evidence-based conflict-containment framework including 10 strategies, such as 'Calm Down Methods'. As virtual reality (VR) scenarios have successfully enhanced anxiolytic and deactivating effects of therapeutic interventions, they are increasingly considered a means to enhance current models, like Safewards. OBJECTIVES: The present participatory design investigates the feasibility and user experience of integrating VR therapy as an add-on strategy to the Safewards model, gathering preliminary data and qualitative feedback from bedside staff in an adult inpatient mental health unit. METHODS: An exploratory within-subjects design combining qualitative observations, self-report questionnaires and semistructured interviews is employed with four nurse champions from the mental health unit at Michael Garron Hospital (Toronto, Canada). RESULTS: A chronological overview of the design process, adaptations and description of the user experience is reported. CONCLUSION: 'SafeVRwards' introduces VR as a promising conflic-containment strategy complementary to the Safewards model, which can be optimised for deployment through user-oriented refinements and enhanced customisation capacity driven by clinical staff input.
Assuntos
Realidade Virtual , Humanos , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Inquéritos e Questionários , Unidade Hospitalar de Psiquiatria/normas , Adulto , Conflito PsicológicoRESUMO
Psychiatric inpatients often endure anxiety. This randomized trial assessed the impact of horticultural therapy on anxiety in adult psychiatric inpatients over four weeks, compared to standard care. Recruiting 211 inpatients from six units were randomized into control (n = 105) and experimental (n = 106) groups. Control received usual care; the experimental group had horticultural therapy alongside usual care. Anxiety, measured using HADS-A scale at four weeks, aimed to establish horticultural therapy's superiority. After four weeks, horticultural therapy significantly reduced anxiety compared to standard care (P < 0.001). These results argue in favor of integrating horticultural therapy into psychiatric nursing practices.Trial registration: No Clinical Trail: NCT02666339 (1st registration: 28/01/2016).
Assuntos
Ansiedade , Horticultura Terapêutica , Unidade Hospitalar de Psiquiatria , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Adulto , Horticultura Terapêutica/métodos , Ansiedade/terapia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pacientes Internados/psicologia , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
AIM: To explore and describe the daily experiences of non-psychiatric nurses working in selected acute psychiatric wards in South Africa. DESIGN: A qualitative explorative and descriptive study design was used. METHODS: Individual face-to-face semi-structured interviews were used to gather data from fifteen non-psychiatric nurses with a minimum of one month of experience working in acute psychiatric wards in Limpopo Province, South Africa. Data were analysed using eight Tech techniques. The study is reported following consolidation criteria for reporting qualitative research. RESULTS: Findings on non-psychiatric nurses' daily experience revealed three themes: (1) Unsafe working environment, (2) Managing difficulties due to lack of skills and (3) Strategies to support non-psychiatric nurses in acute psychiatric wards. Findings suggested institutional and managerial interventions in the form of orientation, in-service training and workshops and resource provision. Future studies should be done to develop a model for supporting non-psychiatric nurses in Limpopo Province, South Africa's acute psychiatric wards.
Assuntos
Unidade Hospitalar de Psiquiatria , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Humanos , África do Sul , Feminino , Adulto , Masculino , Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem Hospitalar/psicologia , Local de Trabalho/psicologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Entrevistas como AssuntoRESUMO
This study investigated the efficacy of psychotherapy during hospitalization on an acute psychiatric ward. A controlled trial was conducted to assess the effects of Metacognitive Reflection and Insight Therapy (MERIT) upon metacognition and psychiatric symptoms. Data from 40 inpatient women were analysed. Findings included significant interaction effects between group (intervention or control group) and time (preintervention and postintervention) in regard to the metacognitive abilities and general psychiatric symptoms. Participating in MERIT seems to improve one's ability to use reflective knowledge to cope with psychological challenges and to improve symptomatology level.
Assuntos
Transtornos Mentais , Metacognição , Unidade Hospitalar de Psiquiatria , Humanos , Feminino , Adulto , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Transtornos Mentais/psicologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Psicoterapia/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Adaptação PsicológicaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Body worn cameras (BWC) are mobile audio and video capture devices that can be secured to clothing allowing the wearer to record some of what they see and hear. This technology is being introduced in a range of healthcare settings as part of larger violence reduction strategies aimed at reducing incidents of aggression and violence on inpatient wards, however limited evidence exists to understand if this technology achieves such goals. AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the implementation of BWCs on two inpatient mental health wards, including the impact on incidents, the acceptability to staff and patients, the sustainability of the resource use and ability to manage the use of BWCs on these wards. METHODS: The study used a mixed-methods design comparing quantitative measures including ward activity and routinely collected incident data at three time-points before during and after the pilot implementation of BWCs on one acute ward and one psychiatric intensive care unit, alongside pre and post pilot qualitative interviews with patients and staff, analysed using a framework based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. RESULTS: Results showed no clear relationship between the use of BWCs and rates or severity of incidents on either ward, with limited impact of using BWCs on levels of incidents. Qualitative findings noted mixed perceptions about the use of BWCs and highlighted the complexity of implementing such technology as a violence reduction method within a busy healthcare setting Furthermore, the qualitative data collected during this pilot period highlighted the potential systemic and contextual factors such as low staffing that may impact on the incident data presented. CONCLUSION: This study sheds light on the complexities of using such BWCs as a tool for 'maximising safety' on mental health settings. The findings suggest that BWCs have a limited impact on levels of incidents on wards, something that is likely to be largely influenced by the process of implementation as well as a range of contextual factors. As a result, it is likely that while BWCs may see successes in one hospital site this is not guaranteed for another site as such factors will have a considerable impact on efficacy, acceptability, and feasibility.
Assuntos
Unidade Hospitalar de Psiquiatria , Humanos , Projetos Piloto , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Violência/prevenção & controle , Gravação em Vídeo , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Dispositivos Eletrônicos VestíveisRESUMO
This manuscript presents the pioneering use of a post-event staff debriefing tool, TALK, in Acute Child and Adolescent Mental Health Units (CAMHU). While unsuccessful in reducing the rate and severity of patient behavioural events, our centre observed promising psychological benefits for CAMHU staff as a result of debriefing, with the tool promoting emotional resiliency and providing a platform for open conversations. Debriefing also served as a venue for patient concerns with care to be raised by staff, addressed and reflected in updated care plans. This initiative demonstrates the utility of debriefing to foster a culture of learning, improve staff wellness and enhance patient safety in CAMHU settings.
Assuntos
Pacientes Internados , Humanos , Adolescente , Criança , Pacientes Internados/psicologia , Pacientes Internados/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Feminino , Unidade Hospitalar de Psiquiatria/organização & administração , Unidade Hospitalar de Psiquiatria/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
The main purpose of this study was to determine the experiences of nurses who care for hospitalized patients experiencing an acute manic episode. This qualitative study was carried out with 15 nurses working in a psychiatric ward in Türkiye. Data were collected through semi-structured in-depth individual interviews and focus-group interviews in which the face-to-face interview technique was used. Two main themes emerged from the analysis of the qualitative data: (1) the difficulties experienced and (2) the most effective elements of care. Under the first main theme, the following sub-themes emerged: difficulties in setting boundaries, safety concerns, difficulties in managing the patient's demands, inability to choose the appropriate word(s), and the "emotional whirlwind" experienced. The second main theme, on the other hand, included the following sub-themes: meeting basic needs, ensuring treatment compliance, encouragement to engage in physical activity, and having a sufficient number of qualified personnel. The study revealed that the nurses had difficulties in caring for their manic patients. On the basis of these results, it is recommended that nurses be given counseling and training on setting boundaries, ensuring safety, managing the patient's demands, coping with their own emotions, and communicating better. In addition, the study identified the importance of nursing interventions to meet patients' basic needs, encourage them to engage in physical activity, and ensure treatment compliance, and the importance of there being an adequate number of qualified personnel. These results may help students and other nurses in terms of assessing and setting priorities in cases needing acute psychiatric care.
Assuntos
Grupos Focais , Enfermagem Psiquiátrica , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Humanos , Feminino , Adulto , Masculino , Mania/psicologia , Unidade Hospitalar de Psiquiatria , Transtorno Bipolar/psicologia , Transtorno Bipolar/enfermagem , Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem Hospitalar/psicologia , Entrevistas como Assunto , Relações Enfermeiro-Paciente , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Hospitalização , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Doença AgudaRESUMO
Background: Acute inpatient mental health services report high levels of safety incidents. The application of patient safety theory has been sparse, particularly concerning interventions that proactively seek patient perspectives. Objective(s): Develop and evaluate a theoretically based, digital monitoring tool to collect real-time information from patients on acute adult mental health wards about their perceptions of ward safety. Design: Theory-informed mixed-methods study. A prototype digital monitoring tool was developed from a co-design approach, implemented in hospital settings, and subjected to qualitative and quantitative evaluation. Setting and methods: Phase 1: scoping review of the literature on patient involvement in safety interventions in acute mental health care; evidence scan of digital technology in mental health contexts; qualitative interviews with mental health patients and staff about perspectives on ward safety. This, alongside stakeholder engagement with advisory groups, service users and health professionals, informed the development processes. Most data collection was virtual. Phase 1 resulted in the technical development of a theoretically based digital monitoring tool that collected patient feedback for proactive safety monitoring. Phase 2: implementation of the tool in six adult acute mental health wards across two UK NHS trusts; evaluation via focused ethnography and qualitative interviews. Statistical analysis of WardSonar data and routine ward data involving construction of an hour-by-hour data set per ward, permitting detailed analysis of the use of the WardSonar tool. Participants: A total of 8 patients and 13 mental health professionals participated in Phase 1 interviews; 33 staff and 34 patients participated in Phase 2 interviews. Interventions: Patients could use a web application (the WardSonar tool) to record real-time perceptions of ward safety. Staff could access aggregated, anonymous data to inform timely interventions. Results: Coronavirus disease 2019 restrictions greatly impacted the study. Stakeholder engagement permeated the project. Phase 1 delivered a theory-based, collaboratively designed digital tool for proactive patient safety monitoring. Phase 2 showed that the tool was user friendly and broadly acceptable to patients and staff. The aggregated safety data were infrequently used by staff. Feasibility depended on engaged staff and embedding use of the tool in ward routines. There is strong evidence that an incident leads to increased probability of further incidents within the next 4 hours. This puts a measure on the extent to which social/behavioural contagion persists. There is weak evidence to suggest that an incident leads to a greater use of the WardSonar tool in the following hour, but none to suggest that ward atmosphere predicts future incidents. Therefore, how often patients use the tool seems to send a stronger signal about potential incidents than patients' real-time reports about ward atmosphere. Limitations: Implementation was limited to two NHS trusts. Coronavirus disease 2019 impacted design processes including stakeholder engagement; implementation; and evaluation of the monitoring tool in routine clinical practice. Higher uptake could enhance validity of the results. Conclusions: WardSonar has the potential to provide a valuable route for patients to communicate safety concerns. The WardSonar monitoring tool has a strong patient perspective and uses proactive real-time safety monitoring rather than traditional retrospective data review. Future work: The WardSonar tool can be refined and tested further in a post Coronavirus disease 2019 context. Study registration: This study is registered as ISRCTN14470430. Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR128070) and is published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 12, No. 14. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Mental health wards can feel unsafe. We know that patients and staff have different ideas about what makes a hospital ward safe or unsafe. Patients are often the first to know when the atmosphere on a ward becomes tense but, often, no one asks them for input or feedback at the time. We worked with service users and staff to develop new technology to make it easy for patients to tell staff about changes in the ward atmosphere. We put everyone's ideas together and some technical developers then built a digital safety tool to use on a tablet computer. Patients put in anonymous information about the ward atmosphere and staff can read it straight away. We tested it on six adult acute mental health wards for 10 weeks. We asked patients and staff what they thought about the tool and we looked at how it was being used. Patients and staff liked the look of the tool on the tablet computer. Some staff said they did not need it because they could tell how patients were feeling, but patients told us that staff did not talk with them much and did not always know when patients were feeling tense. Coronavirus disease 2019 made life difficult on the wards. Most ward managers said the tool could be helpful, but they had not had time to get used to it on the wards. Occasionally, the tablet computers were out of action. Many staff tried hard to use the tool. Most patient information was gathered when it was calm, perhaps because staff were not too busy to help them. We found that this tool could help staff know about tensions on the ward, but they need to get used to it and bring it into ward routines.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Segurança do Paciente , Humanos , Adulto , Masculino , Feminino , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Unidade Hospitalar de Psiquiatria/organização & administração , Reino Unido , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tecnologia Digital , Serviços de Saúde Mental/organização & administração , Medicina Estatal/organização & administração , Participação do Paciente/métodosRESUMO
Written exposure therapy (WET) is a brief, manualized trauma-focused treatment typically delivered in five individual weekly sessions. Given the brevity and effectiveness of WET, researchers have begun to focus on its delivery in a massed format. However, only one case study examining massed delivery has been published to date. As such, the objective of the current study was to examine the acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary effectiveness of massed WET among veterans with a trauma- and stressor-related disorder receiving care on an acute inpatient mental health unit. Veterans (N = 26) were assessed prior to, immediately after, and 1 month following massed WET. Most veterans found massed WET to be useful and acceptable. Recruitment and retention rates suggested that the treatment was feasible. Notably, the results revealed statistically significant reductions in overall posttraumatic stress symptoms, ηp 2 = .81, p < .001; depressive symptoms, ηp 2 = .71, p < .001; and functional impairment, ηp 2 = .42, p = .002. These findings add to a growing body of literature highlighting the preliminary effectiveness of WET across various settings, populations, and delivery formats. Limitations include the small sample size and uncontrolled design.
Assuntos
Terapia Implosiva , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos , Veteranos , Humanos , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/terapia , Veteranos/psicologia , Masculino , Terapia Implosiva/métodos , Adulto , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos de Viabilidade , Pacientes Internados/psicologia , Unidade Hospitalar de PsiquiatriaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Overweight and obesity constitute a major concern among patients treated at forensic psychiatric departments. The present clinical feasibility study aimed at investigating the extent to which glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) treatment with once-daily liraglutide 3.0 mg could be a feasible pharmacological treatment of these conditions in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders hospitalised in forensic psychiatry. METHODS: The 26-week, open-label feasibility study included participants aged 18-65 years diagnosed with a severe mental illness and hospitalised at a forensic psychiatric department. At the time of inclusion, all participants fulfilled the indication for using liraglutide as a treatment for overweight and obesity. Participants' baseline examinations were followed by a 26-week treatment period with liraglutide injection once daily according to a fixed uptitration schedule of liraglutide, with a target dose of 3.0 mg. Each participant attended seven visits to evaluate the efficacy and adverse events. The primary endpoint was the number of "completers", with adherence defined as >80% injections obtained in the period, weeks 12-26. Determining whether liraglutide is a feasible treatment was pre-defined to a minimum of 75% completers. RESULTS: Twenty-four participants were included in the study. Sex, male = 19 (79.2%). Mean age: 42.3 [25th and 75th percentiles: 39.1; 48.4] years; body mass index (BMI): 35.7 [31.7; 37.5] kg/m2; glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c): 37 [35; 39] mmol/mol. Eleven out of 24 participants (46%) completed the study. For the completers, the median net body weight loss after 26 weeks of participation was -11.4 kg [-15.4; -5.9]. The net difference in HbA1C and BMI was -2.0 mmol/mol [-4; -1] and -3.6 kg/m2 [-4.7; -1.8], respectively. The weight change and reduction in HbA1c and BMI were all statistically significant from baseline. CONCLUSION: The study did not confirm our hypothesis that liraglutide is a feasible treatment for a minimum of 75% of the patients initiating treatment with liraglutide while hospitalised in a forensic psychiatric department. The high dropout rate may be due to the non-naturalistic setting of the clinical trial. For the proportion of patients compliant with the medication, liraglutide 3.0 mg was an efficient treatment for overweight.
Assuntos
Estudos de Viabilidade , Liraglutida , Obesidade , Sobrepeso , Esquizofrenia , Humanos , Liraglutida/administração & dosagem , Liraglutida/farmacologia , Adulto , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sobrepeso/tratamento farmacológico , Obesidade/tratamento farmacológico , Esquizofrenia/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto Jovem , Adolescente , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Hipoglicemiantes/administração & dosagem , Hipoglicemiantes/farmacologia , Psiquiatria Legal/métodos , Idoso , Unidade Hospitalar de Psiquiatria , Resultado do Tratamento , Hospitais PsiquiátricosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines state that psychosocial interventions should be the first line of treatment for people with dementia who are experiencing distress behaviours, such as agitation and depression. However, little is known about the characteristics and outcomes of psychosocial interventions or the facilitators and barriers to implementation on inpatient mental health dementia wards which provide care for people with dementia who are often experiencing high levels of distress. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted on MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Psychology and Behavioural Sciences Collection, and Scopus in May 2023, following PRISMA guidelines. Reference and citation searches were conducted on included articles. Peer-reviewed literature of any study design, relating to psychosocial interventions in inpatient mental health dementia wards, was included. One author reviewed all articles, with a third of results reviewed independently by a second author. Data were extracted to a bespoke form and synthesised using a narrative review. The quality of included studies was appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. RESULTS: Sixteen studies were included in the synthesis, which together included a total of 538 people with dementia. Study methods and quality varied. Psychosocial interventions delivered on wards included music therapy (five studies), multisensory interventions (four studies), multicomponent interventions (two studies), technology-based interventions (two studies), massage interventions (two studies) and physical exercise (one study). Reduction in distress and improvement in wellbeing was demonstrated inconsistently across studies. Delivering interventions in a caring and individualised way responding to patient need facilitated implementation. Lack of staff time and understanding of interventions, as well as high levels of staff turnover, were barriers to implementation. CONCLUSION: This review highlights a striking lack of research and therefore evidence base for the use of psychosocial interventions to reduce distress in this vulnerable population, despite current healthcare guidelines. More research is needed to understand which psychosocial interventions can reduce distress and improve wellbeing on inpatient mental health dementia wards, and how interventions should be delivered, to establish clinical and cost effectiveness and minimise staff burden.