Prescription Opioid Use Disorder Among Adults Reporting Prescription Opioid Use With or Without Misuse in the United States.

Objective: We examined prescription related opioid use disorder (POUD) prevalence, individual symptoms, severity, characteristics, and treatment by prescription opioid misuse status among adults with prescription opioid use.Methods: Cross-sectional study using nationally representative data from 47,291 adults aged ≥18 years who participated in the 2021 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Past-year POUD used DSM-5 criteria.Results: Among US adults with past-year prescription opioid use, 12.1% (95% CI, 11.1%-13.1%) misused prescription opioids, and 7.0% (95% CI, 6.2%-8.9%) had POUD. Among adults with POUD, 62.0% (95% CI, 56.7%-67.2%) reported no prescription opioid misuse, including 49.1% (95% CI, 43.5%-54.7%) with mild POUD, 11.0% (95% CI, 6.5%-15.4%) with moderate POUD, and 1.9% (95% CI, 0.6%-3.2%) with severe POUD. Prevalence of POUD was 4.5 times higher (prevalence ratio = 4.5, 95% CI, 3.6-5.6) among those reporting prescription opioid misuse (22.0%, 95% CI, 18.6%-25.8%) than those reporting use without misuse (4.9%, 95% CI, 4.2%-5.7%). Among adults reporting prescription opioid use without misuse, high POUD prevalence was found for those with ≥3 emergency department visits (16.4%, 95% CI, 11.5%-23.0%), heroin use/use disorder (17.1%, 95% CI, 5.2%-43.8%), prescription sedative/ tranquilizer use disorder (36.2%, 95% CI, 23.6%-51.1%), and prescription stimulant use disorder (21.8%, 95% CI, 11.0%-38.7%).Conclusions: Moderate-to-severe POUD is more frequent among adults who report misusing prescription opioids. However, 62% of adults with POUD do not report prescription opioid misuse, suggesting that adults who are treated with prescription opioids and report no misuse could be at risk for developing POUD. Results highlight the need to screen for and treat POUD among adults taking prescription opioids regardless of whether they report prescription opioid misuse.

Factors associated with the use of benzodiazepine and opioid prescription drug in the student population: a cross-sectional study.

The misuse of benzodiazepines and opioid medications is frequent in students. To improve our understanding of this behavior, we aimed to identify factors associated with separate and concomitant use of these substances. Anonymous self-reported questionnaires were e-mailed to students enrolled at a French university between March and July 2021, covering: sociodemographic characteristics, academics, psychoactive substance use, ADHD symptomatology (adulthood and childhood), and psychiatric/psychological or addiction follow-up. Factors associated with the use of benzodiazepines and opioid medications included female sex (OR = 1.41 [1.08; 1.86]) and OR = 1.38 [1.06; 1.79], respectively), older age (OR = 1.65 [1.04; 2.6] and OR = 2.17 [1.4; 3.36], respectively), current psychiatric/psychological follow-up (OR = 6.53 [5.18; 8.24] and OR= 1.5 [1.12; 2.0], respectively), ADHD symptomatology (OR= 2.33 [1.71;3.16] and OR= 1.61 [1.15; 2.24], respectively), polyconsumption (tobacco use for benzodiazepine users, OR = 1.38 [1.04; 1.82]; alcohol use OR = 1.67 [1.17; 2.39] and tobacco use OR = 1.62 [1.23; 2.14] for opioid users). These factors were even more strongly associated with the concomitant use of benzodiazepines and opioid medications: older age (OR = 3.64 [2.22; 5.99]), female sex (OR = 1.54 [1.1; 2.14]), grade repetition (OR = 1.7 [1.14; 2.54]), psychiatric/psychological follow-up (OR = 4.51 [3.35;6.06]), ADHD symptomatology (OR = 5.3 [3.69; 7.63]), polyconsumption (tobacco use OR = 2.05 [1.39; 3] and cannabis use, OR = 2.07 [1.97; 4.16]. The factors associated with the use of benzodiazepines and prescription opioids identified in this study could lead to the development of targeted prevention methods.

Prescription drug monitoring programs and prescription pain medication misuse among U.S. high school students-2019.

BACKGROUND: Prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs) are state-level databases that track and inform prescribing practices to reduce prescription drug diversion and misuse. To our knowledge, only three studies have examined the impact of PDMPs on opioid-related outcomes among adolescents, and none have focused on prescription pain medication misuse among adolescents. METHODS: This study leveraged data from the 2019 National Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS) to explore the associations between five categories of PDMP dimensions and the prevalence of self-reported prescription pain medication misuse. Demographic factors' associations with self-reported prescription pain medication misuse were also examined. RESULTS: In 2019, none of the PDMP dimensions were associated with self-reported prescription pain medication misuse among U.S. high school students, adjusting for gender, grade, race/ethnicity, and sexual orientation. CONCLUSIONS: None of the five PDMP dimensions were associated with lower prescription pain medication misuse, however further research is needed, especially as new YRBS data become available.

Differential etiologic associations of heroin use and prescription opioid misuse with psychopathology.

Patterns of association with externalizing and internalizing features differ across heroin use and prescription opioid misuse (POM). The present study examined whether heroin use and POM display differential etiologic overlap with symptoms of conduct disorder (CD), adult antisocial behavior (AAB), and major depressive episodes (MDEs), how aggregating heroin use and POM into a single phenotype may bias results, and explored potential sex differences. Seven thousand one hundred and sixty-four individual twins from the Australian Twin Registry (ATR; 59.81% female; Mage = 30.58 years) reported lifetime heroin use, POM, CD symptoms, AABs, and MDE symptoms within a semi-structured interview. Biometric models decomposed phenotypic variance and covariance into additive genetic, common environmental, and unique environmental effects. The proportion of variance in heroin use attributable to factors shared with CD, AAB, and MDE, respectively, was 41%, 41%, and 0% for men and 26%, 19%, and 42% for women; for POM, the proportions were 33%, 35%, and 20% for men and 15%, 9%, and 13% for women. CD and AAB were more strongly genetically correlated with heroin use among women and with POM among men. MDE was more strongly genetically correlated with POM than with heroin use among men, but more strongly genetically correlated with heroin use than with POM among women. Analyses using an aggregate opioid (mis)use variable were biased toward POM, which was the more prevalent phenotype. Magnitude and source of etiologic influence may differ across forms of opioid (mis)use and sex. Disaggregating heroin use and POM in future opioid research may be warranted. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Association of Disability Status and Type With Binge Drinking and Prescription Opioid Misuse Among Adults From a 3-State Sample.

BACKGROUND: Research examining at-risk substance use by disability status is limited, with little investigation into differences by disability type. We investigated binge drinking and prescription opioid misuse among adults with and without disabilities, and by type of disability, to inform need for assessment and intervention within these populations. METHODS: Secondary analyses of adults who completed the disability, alcohol, and prescription opioid misuse items in the 2018 Ohio, Florida, or Nebraska Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System surveys (n = 28 341), the only states that included prescription opioid misuse in 2018. Self-reported disability status (yes/no) relied on 6 standardized questions assessing difficulties with: vision, hearing, mobility, cognition, self-care, and independent living (dichotomous, nonmutually exclusive, for each disability). Logistic regression models estimated the association of disability status and type with (1) past 30-day binge drinking and (2) past-year prescription opioid misuse. Additional models were restricted to separate subsamples of adults who: (a) currently drink, (b) received a past-year prescription opioid, and (c) did not receive a past-year prescription opioid. RESULTS: One-third reported at least one disability, with mobility (19.5%), cognitive (11.5%), and hearing (10.2%) disability being the most common. Disability status was associated with lower odds of binge drinking (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68-0.80, P ≤ .01). However, among adults who currently drink, people with disabilities had higher odds of binge drinking (AOR = 1.11, 95% CI 1.01-1.22, P ≤ .05]. Disability was associated with higher odds of past-year prescription opioid misuse (AOR = 2.51, 95% CI 2.17-2.91, P ≤ .01). CONCLUSIONS: Adults with disabilities had higher odds of prescription opioid misuse, and among adults who currently drink, higher odds for binge drinking were observed. The magnitude of the association between disability status and prescription opioid misuse was particularly concerning. Providers should be trained to screen and treat for substance use problems for people with disabilities.

Prescription Opioid Diversion Sources Among African Americans: Implications for Overdose Prevention.

Recent data show that African Americans (AAs) experienced a greater increase in overdose deaths involving prescription opioids relative to other racial/ethnic groups. One possible mechanism through which elevated risk for overdose is conferred to AAs could be due to greater exposure to contaminated counterfeit pills. Unfortunately, prescription opioid diversion is understudied among AAs and less is known regarding which sources AAs use to access pharmaceutical opioids. The objective of this study, therefore, was to identify and describe the most commonly used diversion sources for prescription opioids among AAs. Qualitative interview data are also presented to contextualize the most prevalent sources. This study used data from the Florida Minority Health Study, a mixed-methods project that included online surveys (n = 303) and qualitative in-depth interviews (n = 30) of AAs. Data collection was conducted from August 2021 to February 2022 throughout Southwest Florida. Analyses revealed that the most widely used sources for prescription opioids were dealers (33.0%) and friends/relatives (34.7%). Additionally, interview data indicated that dealers are the access point where larger volume acquisitions are made and high potency formulations are accessed. These findings suggest that AAs may utilize nonhealthcare related sources at higher rates than healthcare related sources to acquire prescription opioids. This is concerning because opioid pills acquired through nonhealthcare related sources are especially susceptible to fentanyl adulteration. These findings invite further study using nationally representative data to determine if AAs disproportionately use nonhealthcare related sources compared to persons from other racial/ethnic groups.

Psychological Distress Mediates the Relationship Between HIV-Related Stigma and Prescription Opioid Misuse Among Chinese People Living with HIV.

Prescription opioid misuse (POM) among people living with HIV (PLWH) is a serious concern due to risks related to dependence and overdose, and PLWH may be at higher risk for POM due to psychosocial stressors including psychological distress. However, scant POM research has examined the role of HIV-related stigma (e.g., internalized stigma, enacted stigma) in POM among PLWH. Guided by minority stress theory, this study examined a hypothesized serial mediation among enacted stigma, internalized stigma, psychological distress, and POM within a sample of Chinese PLWH with pain symptoms enrolled in a wave (between November 2017 and February 2018) of a longitudinal cohort study in Guangxi (n = 116). Models were tested individually for six enacted stigma experiences, controlling for key demographic and health-related variables (e.g., CD4 + count). Results showed HIV-related workplace discrimination was the most common stigma experience (12%,) and 10.3% of PLWH reported POM. Indirect effect analyses showed that internalized stigma was indirectly associated with POM through psychological distress. Internalized stigma and psychological distress mediated the association between workplace discrimination and POM. Family discrimination, gossip, and healthcare discrimination were directly associated with POM. This study suggests that Chinese PLWH may engage in POM to cope with psychological distress that is rooted in HIV-related stigma and highlights the important context of workplace discrimination for PLWH. Implications for interventions to reduce POM among PLWH are discussed.

Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Stimulant Therapy and Prescription Drug Misuse During Transition to Young Adulthood.

OBJECTIVE: Limited prospective data exist about the impact of stimulant therapy for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) during adolescence on the risk for later prescription drug misuse (PDM; i.e., of benzodiazepines, opioids, and stimulants). METHODS: National longitudinal multicohort panels (baseline cohort years 2005-2017) of U.S. 12th grade students (N=11,066; ages 17 and 18 years) from the Monitoring the Future study were surveyed via self-administered questionnaires and followed up biennially during young adulthood (ages 19-24). A multivariable analysis was used to assess whether adolescents' lifetime history of stimulant therapy for ADHD was associated with subsequent PDM. RESULTS: Overall, 9.9% of adolescents reported lifetime stimulant therapy for ADHD at ages 17 and 18. No significant differences were found in the adjusted odds of later incidence or prevalence of past-year PDM during young adulthood between adolescents with lifetime stimulant therapy and adolescents with no stimulant therapy. Over the 5-year follow-up, past-year PDM during young adulthood was most prevalent among adolescents who reported both stimulant therapy and prescription stimulant misuse (53.1%) and those who reported prescription stimulant misuse only (51.5%). Compared with adolescents in a control group without lifetime stimulant therapy or misuse, adolescents reporting prescription stimulant misuse had significantly higher adjusted odds of later incidence and prevalence of PDM during young adulthood. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents' stimulant therapy for ADHD was not significantly associated with increased risk for later PDM during young adulthood. In contrast, adolescents' misuse of prescription stimulants strongly predicted later PDM. Monitoring adolescents for prescription stimulant misuse may help identify and mitigate the risk for future PDM.

Chronic Pain and Opioid Prescribing: Three Ways for Navigating Complexity at the Clinical‒Population Health Interface.

Clinically focused interventions for people living with pain, such as health professional education, clinical decision support systems, prescription drug monitoring programs, and multidisciplinary care to support opioid tapering, have all been promoted as important solutions to the North American opioid crisis. Yet none have so far delivered substantive beneficial opioid-related population health outcomes. In fact, while total opioid prescribing has leveled off or reduced in many jurisdictions, population-level harms from opioids have continued to increase dramatically. We attribute this failure partly to a poor recognition of the epistemic and ethical complexities at the interface of clinical and population health. We draw on a framework of knowledge networks in wicked problems to identify 3 strategies to help navigate these complexities: (1) designing and evaluating clinically focused interventions as complex interventions, (2) reformulating evidence to make population health dynamics apparent, and (3) appealing to the inseparability of facts and values to support decision-making in uncertainty. We advocate that applying these strategies will better equip clinically focused interventions as complements to structural and public health interventions to achieve the desired beneficial population health effects. (Am J Public Health. 2022;112(S1):S56-S65. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306500).

Trends in Opioid Use Among Cancer Patients in the United States: 2013-2018.

Background: In response to the US opioid epidemic, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention updated their guideline on prescription opioids for chronic pain management in March 2016. The aim of this study was to provide detailed analysis of trends in opioid claims among cancer patients in the United States during 2013-2018. Methods: We analyzed pharmaceutical dispensing data from Symphony Health's Integrated Dataverse database, which covers approximately 80% of the US population. We examined annual trends in dispensed opioids in cancer patients during 2013-2018. We examined quarterly trends of the prevalence, mean number of days, and dose (stated as morphine milligram equivalents) of opioid dispensing in cancer patients. Results: Dispensing records of an average of over 3.7 million cancer patients contributed to the study annually in 2013-2018. The annual prevalence of opioid dispensing claims declined from 40.2% in 2013 to 34.5% in 2018. Annual declines occurred across cancer sites, and particularly among patients with metastatic cancer (decline of 19.8%), breast cancer (18.2%), and lung cancer (13.8%). By quarter, the prevalence of opioid claims declined statistically significantly from 26.6% in Q1 2013 to 21.2% in Q4 2018; this decline was more pronounced after Q3 2016 (2-sided P = .004). Both quarterly trends in mean days and morphine milligram equivalents of opioids supplied showed a gradual decline from 2013 to 2018, with a slightly larger decline after 2016. Conclusions: We observed a decline in opioid use among cancer patients, particularly after 2016, coinciding with the publication of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's guideline on prescription opioids for chronic pain management.

Trajectories of Prescription Drug Misuse Among US Adults From Ages 18 to 50 Years.

Importance: US adults born from 1965 to 1996 had high exposure to controlled medications, yet little is known about how this exposure has affected them over time. Prescription drug misuse (PDM) has increased among adults in the past 2 decades, with related increases in emergency department visits, overdoses, and deaths. Objectives: To identify 32-year PDM trajectories involving opioids, stimulants, and sedatives or tranquilizers and to examine associations between these PDM trajectories and substance use disorder (SUD) symptoms in adulthood as well as between baseline characteristics and PDM trajectories. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included 11 cohorts of adolescents who were followed up longitudinally from age 18 years (study start, 1976-1986) to age 50 years (2008-2018) in the Monitoring the Future (MTF) study, which included a national multistage random sample of US 12th grade students. Baseline surveys (modal age 18) were self-administered in classrooms. Ten follow-ups were conducted by mail. Data analysis was conducted from December 2020 to October 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: Sociodemographic variables were measured at baseline. PDM and SUD symptoms were measured at baseline and every follow-up. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was used to create PDM trajectory profiles. Associations between these PDM trajectories, SUD symptoms, and baseline sociodemographic characteristics were examined. Results: The sample of 26 575 individuals was 50.8% (95% CI, 50.2%-51.4%) female and 79.3% (95% CI, 78.8%-79.8%) White. The baseline response rate ranged from 77% to 84%, and the 32-year retention rate was 53%. In adjusting for attrition, 45.7% (95% CI, 44.9%-46.4%) of the respondents reported past-year PDM at least once during the 32-year reporting period. Among those who reported PDM, the prevalence of poly-PDM was 40.3% (95% CI, 39.3%-41.3%). Based on LPA, the number of class-specific PDM trajectories ranged from 4 (prescription opioids) to 6 (prescription stimulants). For the class-combined analyses, we identified 8 PDM trajectories consisting of early peak trajectories (eg, age 18 years), later peak trajectories (eg, age 40 years), and a high-risk trajectory (eg, high frequency PDM at multiple ages). All PDM trajectories were associated with increased odds of developing SUD symptoms in middle adulthood, especially the later peak and high-risk trajectories compared with early peak trajectories (eg, peak at age 40 years: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 5.17; 95% CI, 3.97-6.73; high-risk: aOR, 12.41; 95% CI, 8.47-18.24). Baseline characteristics associated with a high-risk trajectory were binge drinking (aOR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.13-2.54), cigarette smoking (aOR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.60-3.29), and marijuana use (aOR, 3.78; 95% CI, 2.38-6.01). More recent cohorts (eg, 1985-1986) had a higher risk of belonging to later peak PDM trajectories (ages 40 and 45 years) than the 1976-1978 cohort (age 40 years peak: aOR, 2.49; 95% CI, 1.69-3.68). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, adults with later peak PDM trajectories were at increased risk of SUD symptoms in middle adulthood. These findings suggest the need to screen for PDM and SUD from adolescence through middle adulthood.

An Emergency Preparedness Response to Opioid-Prescribing Enforcement Actions in Maryland, 2018-2019.

Federal and state enforcement authorities have increasingly intervened on the criminal overprescribing of opioids. However, little is known about the health effects these enforcement actions have on patients experiencing disrupted access to prescription opioids or medication-assisted treatment/medication for opioid use disorder. Simultaneously, opioid death rates have increased. In response, the Maryland Department of Health (MDH) has worked to coordinate mitigation strategies with enforcement partners (defined as any federal, state, or local enforcement authority or other governmental investigative authority). One strategy is a standardized protocol to implement emergency response functions, including rapidly identifying health hazards with real-time data access, deploying resources locally, and providing credible messages to partners and the public. From January 2018 through October 2019, MDH used the protocol in response to 12 enforcement actions targeting 34 medical professionals. A total of 9624 patients received Schedule II-V controlled substance prescriptions from affected prescribers under investigation in the 6 months before the respective enforcement action; 9270 (96%) patients were residents of Maryland. Preliminary data indicate fatal overdose events and potential loss of follow-up care among the patient population experiencing disrupted health care as a result of an enforcement action. The success of the strategy hinged on endorsement by leadership; the establishment of federal, state, and local roles and responsibilities; and data sharing. MDH's approach, data sources, and lessons learned may support health departments across the country that are interested in conducting similar activities on the front lines of the opioid crisis.

Rapid Diagnostic Tests to Guide Case Management of and Improve Antibiotic Stewardship for Pediatric Acute Respiratory Illnesses in Resource-Constrained Settings: a Prospective Cohort Study in Southwestern Uganda.

Pediatric acute respiratory illness (ARI) is one of the most common reasons for evaluation at peripheral health centers in sub-Saharan Africa and is frequently managed based on clinical syndrome alone. Although most ARI episodes are likely caused by self-limited viral infections, the majority are treated with antibiotics. This overuse contributes to the development of antimicrobial resistance. To evaluate the preliminary feasibility and potential impact of adding pathogen-specific and clinical biomarker diagnostic testing to existing clinical management algorithms, we conducted a prospective, observational cohort study of 225 children presenting with malaria-negative, febrile ARI to the outpatient department of a semi-urban peripheral health facility in southwestern Uganda from October 2019 to January 2020. In addition to routine clinical evaluation, we performed influenza and Streptococcus pneumoniae antigen testing and measured levels of C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and lactate in the clinic's laboratory, and conducted a follow-up assessment by phone 7 days later. Almost one-fifth of participants (40/225) tested positive for influenza. Clinical biomarker measurements were low with C-reactive protein of >40 mg/L in only 11% (13/222) of participants and procalcitonin >0.25 ng/mL in only 13% (16/125). All but two children received antibiotic treatment; only 3% (7/225) were admitted. At follow-up, 59% (118/201) of caregivers reported at least one persistent symptom, but fever had resolved for all children. Positive influenza testing was associated with persistent symptoms. In summary, we demonstrate that simple, rapid pathogen-specific testing and biomarker measurement are possible in resource-limited settings and could improve syndromic management and, in turn, antibiotic stewardship. IMPORTANCE Globally, respiratory illness is one of the most common reasons that children seek care. It is often treated inappropriately with antibiotics, which can drive the development of antibiotic resistance. In resource-rich settings, testing for specific pathogens or measurement of clinical biomarkers, such as procalcitonin and C-reactive protein, is often employed to help determine which children should receive antibiotics. However, there are limited data on the use of these tests in resource-constrained, outpatient contexts in sub-Saharan Africa. We enrolled children with respiratory illness presenting to a clinic in southwestern Uganda and performed testing for influenza, Streptococcus pneumoniae, C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin on-site. Almost all children received antibiotics. We demonstrate that employing clinical algorithms that include influenza and clinical biomarker testing could significantly decrease antibiotic prescriptions. Our study therefore provides preliminary data to support the feasibility and potential utility of diagnostics to improve management of respiratory illness in resource-constrained settings.

Urban scaling of opioid analgesic sales in the United States.

Opioid misuse is a public health crisis in the United States. The origin of this crisis is associated with a sharp increase in opioid analgesic prescribing. We used the urban scaling framework to analyze opioid prescribing patterns in US commuting zones (CZs), i.e., groups of counties based on commuting patterns. The urban scaling framework postulates that a set of scaling relations can be used to predict health outcomes and behaviors in cities. We used data from the Drug Enforcement Administration's Automated Reports and Consolidated Ordering System (ARCOS) to calculate counts of oxycodone/hydrocodone pills distributed to 607 CZs in the continental US from 2006 to 2014. We estimated the scaling coefficient of opioid pill counts by regressing log(pills) on log(population) using a piecewise linear spline with a single knot at 82,363. Our results show that CZs with populations below the knot scaled superlinearly (ß = 1.36), i.e., larger CZs had disproportionally larger pill counts compared to smaller CZs. On the other hand, CZs with populations above the knot scaled sublinearly (ß = 0.92), i.e., larger CZs had disproportionally smaller pill counts compared to smaller CZs. This dual scaling pattern was consistent across US census regions. For CZs with population below the knot, the superlinear scaling of pills is consistent with the explanation that an increased number of successful matches between prescribers and users will lead to higher prescribing rates. The non-linear scaling behavior observed could be the result of a combination of factors, including stronger health care systems and prescribing regulation in largely populated commuting zones, as well as high availability of other opioids such as heroin in these commuting zones. Future research should explore potential mechanisms for the non-linearity of prescription opioid pills.

Effect of COVID-19 disruptions on young adults' affect and substance use in daily life.

OBJECTIVE: Guided by accounts of adjustment in daily life as a key indicator of health, the current study examined prospective changes in young adults' emotions and substance behaviors assessed during a normative baseline period and during the acute COVID-19 disruption period in late March/early April 2020. The COVID-19 assessment also collected psychosocial risk factors expected to moderate changes in adjustment across time. METHOD: Participants included 295 young adults (70.8% female; ages 18-21 at baseline), drawn from an ongoing study of daily behaviors and health in college life that oversampled for recent substance behaviors, who completed both the baseline and COVID-19 assessments. Hypotheses were tested using analyses of repeated-measures data that included covariates of length of time between assessments and sampling group status. RESULTS: Direct tests in support of hypotheses indicated an increase in negative affect (d = .67, p < .001), and greater alcohol use (d = .75, p < .001) and marijuana use (d = .58, p < .001), in daily life across time. Levels of positive affect (d = .08, p > .05), nicotine use (d = .01, p > .05), and prescription drug misuse (d = .003, p > .05) did not reliably change in tests of direct models. Moderation tests indicated several risk factors for experiencing steeper increases in negative affect, and increased likelihood of marijuana and nicotine use, in daily life across time. CONCLUSIONS: Findings offer implications for future research and clinical efforts to improve young adult adjustment in response to the pandemic. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

COBRE on Opioid and Overdose: A Collaborative Research-Based Center Addressing the Crises in Rhode Island and Beyond.

Overdose deaths across the country have spiked since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. It is crucial now, more than ever, to address the continuing and worsening, complex and dynamic opioid and overdose epidemics. In 2018, The Center of Biomedical Research Excellence (COBRE) on Opioids and Overdose, based at Rhode Island Hospital, launched with three major goals: 1) establish a center of scientific excellence on opioids and overdose; 2) train the next generation of scientists to become independent investigators and address the opioid and overdose crises; and 3) contribute to the scientific progress and solutions to combat these epidemics. To date, we have made substantial progress. While the opioid and overdose crises continue to evolve, the COBRE on Opioid and Overdose and its team of investigators are well poised to address the daunting task of understanding and meaningfully addressing these deadly epidemics, with the ultimate goal of saving lives.

Perspectives of US Adolescents on Diverted Stimulant Use.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate perspectives of youth regarding diverted stimulant use among a contemporary sample of adolescents and young adults. STUDY DESIGN: This study used MyVoice, a longitudinal national text message survey of American youth. In February 2019, 1228 MyVoice youth were asked 4 open-ended questions to elicit their perspectives on diverted stimulant use. Responses were assessed using thematic analysis, and quantitative results were summarized using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Of 1228 youth, 906 responded to at least one survey question (relative risk, 74%). Respondents' ages ranged from 14 to 24 years with a mean age of 18.8 ± 2.9 years, 57% were female, and 66% identified as White. Peer pressure and coping were commonly perceived reasons for diversion, and respondents believed that many youth misuse stimulants. Many were aware of health risks of misuse, but few mentioned potential legal consequences. Youth thought stimulants could be obtained from peers, people with a prescription, dealers, and family, and some mentioned access through unnecessary prescriptions. CONCLUSIONS: The perspectives of a national sample of youth suggest that stimulant diversion continues to be a significant problem among American youth, with many noting that diverted stimulants are easy to obtain and are used to self-treat mental health issues. Standardized interventions at schools and in healthcare settings, as well as universal screening for diversion and mental health conditions, may combat this public health concern.

NarxCare Scores Greater Than 300 Are Associated with Adverse Outcomes After Primary THA.

BACKGROUND: The association between preoperative prescription drug use (narcotics, sedatives, and stimulants) and complications and/or greater healthcare utilization (length of stay, discharge disposition, readmission, emergency department visits, and reoperation) after total joint arthroplasty has been established but not well quantified. The NarxCare score (NCS) is a weighted scalar measure of overall prescription opioid, sedative, and stimulant use. Higher scores reflect riskier drug-use patterns, which are calculated based on (1) the number of prescribing providers, (2) the number of dispensing pharmacies, (3) milligram equivalence doses, (4) coprescribed potentiating drugs, and (5) overlapping prescription days. The aforementioned factors have not been incorporated into association measures between preoperative prescription drug use and adverse events after THA. In addition, the utility of the NCS as a scalar measure in predicting post-THA complications has not been explored. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Is the NarxCare score (NCS) associated with 90-day readmission, reoperation, emergency department visits, length of stay, and discharge disposition after primary THA; and are there NCS thresholds associated with a higher risk for those adverse outcomes if such an association exists? (2) Is there an association between the type of preoperative active drug prescription and the aforementioned outcomes? METHODS: Of 3040 primary unilateral THAs performed between November 2018 and December 2019, 92% (2787) had complete baseline information and were subsequently included. The cohort with missing baseline information (NCS or demographic/racial determinants; 8%) had similar BMI distribution but slightly younger age and a lower Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Outcomes in this retrospective study of a longitudinally maintained institutional database included 90-day readmissions (all-cause, procedure, and nonprocedure-related), reoperations, 90-day emergency department (ED) visits, prolonged length of stay (> 2 days), and discharge disposition (home or nonhome). The association between the NCS category and THA outcomes was analyzed through multivariable regression analyses and a confirmatory propensity score-matched comparison based on age, gender, race, BMI, smoking status, CCI, insurance status, preoperative diagnosis, and surgical approach, which removed significant differences at baseline. A similar regression model was constructed to evaluate the association between the type of preoperative active drug prescription (opioids, sedatives, and stimulants) and adverse outcomes after THA. RESULTS: After controlling for potentially confounding variables like age, gender, race, BMI, smoking status, CCI, insurance status, preoperative diagnosis, and surgical approach, an NCS of 300 to 399 was associated with a higher odds of 90-day all-cause readmission (odds ratio 2.0 [95% confidence interval 1.1 to 3.3]; p = 0.02), procedure-related readmission (OR 3.3 [95% CI 1.4 to 7.9]; p = 0.006), length of stay > 2 days (OR 2.2 [95% CI 1.5 to 3.2]; p < 0.001), and nonhome discharge (OR 2.0 [95% CI 1.3 to 3.1]; p = 0.002). A score of 400 to 499 demonstrated a similar pattern, in addition to a higher odds of 90-day emergency department visits (OR 2.2 [95% CI 1.2 to 3.9]; p = 0.01). After controlling for potentially confounding variables like age, gender, race, BMI, smoking status, CCI, insurance status, preoperative diagnosis, and surgical approach, we found no clinically important association between an active opioid prescription and 90-day all-cause readmission (OR 1.002 [95% CI 1.001 to 1.004]; p = 0.05), procedure-related readmission (OR 1.003 [95% CI 1.001 to 1.006]; p = 0.02), length of stay > 2 days (OR 1.003 [95% CI 1.002 to 1.005]; p < 0.001), or nonhome discharge (OR 1.002 [95% CI 1.001 to 1.003]; p = 0.019); the large size of the database allowed us to find statistical associations, but the effect sizes are so small that the finding is unlikely to be clinically meaningful. A similarly small association that is unlikely to be clinically important was found between active sedative use and 90-day ED visits (OR 1.002 [95% CI 1.001 to 1.004]; p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Preoperative prescription drug use, as reflected by higher NCSs, has a dose-response association with adverse outcomes after THA. Surgeons may use the preoperative NCS to initiate and guide a patient-centered discussion regarding possible postoperative risks associated with prescription drug-use patterns (sedatives, opioids, or stimulants). An interdisciplinary approach can then be initiated to mitigate unfavorable patterns of prescription drug use and subsequently lower patient NCSs. However, given its nature and its reflection of drug-use patterns rather than patients' current health status, the NCS does not qualify as a basis for surgical denial or ineligibility. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study.

Pharmaceutical Opioid Use Patterns and Indicators of Extramedical Use and Harm in Adults With Chronic Noncancer Pain, 2012-2018.

Importance: Despite concern about harms related to long-term prescribed opioid use among individuals with chronic noncancer pain (CNCP), no study has examined whether the same patients engage in a risky pattern of use consistently for the long term. Objective: To examine the prevalence, incidence, persistence, and cessation of a range of opioid behaviors, indicators of extramedical use, and harm among individuals who are prescribed opioids. Design, Setting, and Participants: This 5-year prospective cohort study in communities across Australia included 1514 adults who were prescribed opioids for CNCP. Data collection took place from August 2012 to December 2018, and data analysis took place from February to November 2020. Exposure: Prescription opioid use. Main Outcomes and Measures: High-dose opioid use (≥200 oral morphine equivalent [OME] mg/d); requesting an increase in opioid dose; requesting an early prescription renewal; tampering with opioid medication; diversion of medication to others; and International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision opioid dependence. Cessation of opioid use was also assessed. Results: Of the 1514 participants, 672 (44.39%) were men, the mean (SD) age was 58 (19) years, and 737 (48.68%) were unemployed. At each annual interview, approximately 1 in 8 people (10.98% [95% CI, 10.33%-11.63%] to 14.73% [95% CI, 13.98%-15.48%] at any given interview) were taking more than 200 OME mg/d; comparatively more had requested an increased dosage in the previous 3 months (8.46% [95% CI, 7.89%-9.03%] to 23.77% [95% CI, 22.82%-24.73%]); and fewer asked for an early prescription renewal (4.61% [95% CI, 4.19%-5.03%] to 13.97% [95% CI, 13.24%-14.70%]). In any given interview, between 3.06% (95% CI, 2.72%-3.40%) and 7.86% (95% CI, 7.31%-8.41%) of respondents reported tampering and between 0.47% (95% CI, 0.33%-0.60%) and 1.39% (95% CI, 1.16%-1.62%) reported diversion to others. Between 8.28% (95% CI, 7.71%-8.84%) and 13.06% (95% CI, 12.35%-13.77%) met criteria for opioid dependence at each interview. Opioid cessation increased across interviews, from year 1 (9.15% [95% CI, 8.55%-9.74%]) to year 5 (20.02% [19.14%-20.89%]). There was considerable incidence and cessation in all behaviors from 1 interview to the next: most who engaged in any of these behaviors only did so at only 1 interview. For pharmaceutical opioid dependence, between 55.26% (95% CI, 53.81%-56.71%) and 64.44% (95% CI, 62.87%-66.00%) of cases in 1 interview did not meet dependence criteria in the following interview. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest considerable fluidity in opioid use, extramedical behaviors, and opioid dependence among people with CNCP. This reinforces the need for reassessment of the effectiveness and safety of prescription opioid use over time.