Mucosal delivery of a prefusogenic-F, glycoprotein, and matrix proteins-based virus-like particle respiratory syncytial virus vaccine induces protective immunity as evidenced by challenge studies in mice.

RSV infection remains a serious threat to the children all over the world, especially, in the low-middle income countries. Vaccine delivery via the mucosa holds great potential for inducing local immune responses in the respiratory tract. Previously, we reported the development of highly immunogenic RSV virus-like-particles (RSV-VLPs) based on the conformationally stable prefusogenic-F protein (preFg), glycoprotein and matrix protein. Here, to explore whether mucosal delivery of RSV-VLPs is an effective strategy to induce RSV-specific mucosal and systemic immunity, RSV-VLPs were administered via the nasal, sublingual and pulmonary routes to BALB/c mice. The results demonstrate that immunization with the VLPs via the mucosal routes induced minimal mucosal response and yet facilitated modest levels of serum IgG antibodies, enhanced T cell responses and the expression of the lung-homing marker CXCR3 on splenocytes. Immunization with VLPs via all three mucosal routes provided protection against RSV challenge with no signs of RSV induced pathology.

Immunogenicity, safety and reactogenicity of Ad26.RSV.preF/RSV preF protein vaccine in adults aged 60 to 75 years: A comparison of phase 2b and phase 3 clinical trial material.

The Ad26.RSV.preF/RSV preF protein vaccine has previously demonstrated efficacyin protecting older adults against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-related lower respiratory tract disease in a phase 2b study. This study compared the immunogenicity of vaccine clinical trial material (CTM) representative of phase 2b clinical studies with CTM used in phase 3 clinical studies. A total of 248 adults aged 60-75 years, randomized in a 1:1 ratio, received one dose of either phase 3 CTM or phase 2b CTM. Solicited adverse events (AEs), unsolicited AEs, and serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed for 7-d, 28-d, and 6-month periods post-vaccination, respectively. RSV preF-ELISA antibody titers and RSV neutralizing titers were measured before and 14 d after vaccination. The phase 3 CTM-induced preF-ELISA response at Day 15, in terms of geometric mean titer, was shown to be non-inferior to that induced by phase 2b CTM. The RSV neutralizing antibody titers were also similar in the two groups at Day 15. The safety profile in terms of solicited AEs, unsolicited AEs, or SAEs was in general similar between the phase 3 CTM and phase 2b CTM groups, and solicited AEs were mostly mild to moderate in intensity. No related SAEs were reported, and no safety concerns were identified.

Implementation of the first respiratory syncytial (RSV) immunization campaign with nirsevimab in an autonomous community in Spain.

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the main cause of low respiratory tract infections in infants under one year of age. In the 2023/2024 season, the monoclonal antibody nirsevimab was available to protect children from RSV, and Spain has become one of the first countries worldwide to implement this strategy. It is essential to evaluate the results of this first campaign and different characteristics of the immunized population in order to plan next campaigns, especially for countries that are going to include this immunization. Our coverage was high (91.5% for those born during the season and 88.3% globally). For those born during the season, only 4.9% preferred not to immunize at the maternity hospital, which meant an average delay of 27.45 days. We observed a lower coverage in the population of immigrant origin. There was a rapid pace of immunization, since for those born before the beginning of the campaign the mean to be immunized was 15.63 days, without differences between healthy and at-risk children. This allows immunization before the RSV season (90% of the catch-up children had been immunized on November 3). The average age at which all the immunized children have received nirsevimab was lower in healthy children compared to those with risk conditions (49.65 versus 232.85 days). For those born during the campaign, the average age was also lower in healthy children (3.14 versus 14.58 days). In conclusion, we consider that the implementation of the immunization strategy with nirsevimab in the Region of Murcia, Spain, has been a success.

Use of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccines in Adults Aged ≥60 Years: Updated Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices - United States, 2024.

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a major cause of respiratory illness and hospitalization in older adults during fall and winter in the United States. The 2023-2024 RSV season was the first during which RSV vaccination was recommended for U.S. adults aged ≥60 years, using shared clinical decision-making. On June 26, 2024, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices voted to update this recommendation as follows: a single dose of any Food and Drug Administration-approved RSV vaccine (Arexvy [GSK]; Abrysvo [Pfizer]; or mResvia [Moderna]) is now recommended for all adults aged ≥75 years and for adults aged 60-74 years who are at increased risk for severe RSV disease. Adults who have previously received RSV vaccine should not receive another dose. This report summarizes the evidence considered for these updated recommendations, including postlicensure data on vaccine effectiveness and safety, and provides clinical guidance for the use of RSV vaccines in adults aged ≥60 years. These updated recommendations are intended to maximize RSV vaccination coverage among persons most likely to benefit, by clarifying who is at highest risk and by reducing implementation barriers associated with the previous shared clinical decision-making recommendation. Continued postlicensure monitoring will guide future recommendations.

Cold-adapted influenza vaccine carrying three repeats of a respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) fusion glycoprotein epitope site protects BALB/c mice and cotton rats against RSV infection.

Respiratory syncytial virus is the major cause of respiratory viral infections, particularly in infants, immunocompromised populations, and the elderly (over 65 years old), the prevention of RSV infection has become a priority. In this study, we generated a chimeric influenza virus, termed LAIV/RSV/HA-3F, using reverse genetics technology which contained three repeats of the RSV fusion protein neutralizing epitope site II to the N terminal in the background of the hemagglutinin (HA) gene of cold adapted influenza vaccine A/California/7/2009 ca. LAIV/RSV/HA-3F exhibited cold-adapted (ca) and attenuated (att) phenotype. BALB/c mice immunized intranasally with LAIV/RSV/HA-3F showed robust immunogenicity, inducing viral-specific antibody responses against both influenza and RSV, eliciting RSV-specific humoral, cellular and mucosal immune responses. LAIV/RSV/HA-3F also conferred protection as indicated by reduced viral titers and improved lung histopathological alterations against live RSV virus challenge. Mechanismly, single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and single-cell T cell antigen receptor (TCR) sequencing were employed to characterize the immune responses triggered by chimeric RSV vaccine, displaying that LAIV/RSV/HA-3F provided protection mainly via interferon-γ (IFN-γ). Moreover, we found that LAIV/RSV/HA-3F significantly inhibited viral replication in the challenged lung and protected against subsequent RSV challenge in cotton rats without causing lung disease. Taken together, our findings demonstrated that LAIV/RSV/HA-3F has potential as a promising bivalent vaccine with dual purpose candidate for the prevention of influenza and RSV, and preclinical and clinical studies warrant further investigations.

Cost-effectiveness of RSVpreF vaccine and nirsevimab for the prevention of respiratory syncytial virus disease in Canadian infants.

BACKGROUND: Health Canada recently authorized the RSVpreF pregnancy vaccine and nirsevimab to protect infants against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) disease. OBJECTIVE: Assess the cost-effectiveness of RSVpreF and nirsevimab programs in preventing RSV disease in infants, compared to a palivizumab program. METHODS: We used a static cohort model of a Canadian birth cohort during their first RSV season to estimate sequential incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) in 2023 Canadian dollars per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) for nine strategies implemented over a one-year time period, from the health system and societal perspectives. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were conducted to explore the impact of uncertainties on the results. RESULTS: All-infants nirsevimab programs averted more RSV-related outcomes than year-round RSVpreF programs, with the most RSV cases averted in a seasonal nirsevimab program with catch-up. Assuming list prices for these immunizing agents, all-infants nirsevimab and year-round RSVpreF programs were never cost-effective, with ICERs far exceeding commonly used cost-effectiveness thresholds. Seasonal nirsevimab with catch-up for infants born outside the RSV season was a cost-effective program if prioritized for infants at moderate/high-risk (ICER <$28,000 per QALY) or those living in settings with higher RSV burden and healthcare costs, such as remote communities where transport would be complex (ICER of $5700 per QALY). Using a $50,000 per QALY threshold, an all-infants nirsevimab program could be optimal if nirsevimab is priced at <$110-190 per dose. A year-round RSVpreF for all pregnant women and pregnant people plus nirsevimab for infants at high-risk was optimal if nirsevimab is priced at >$110-190 per dose and RSVpreF priced at <$60-125 per dose. INTERPRETATION: Prophylactic interventions can substantially reduce RSV disease in infants, and more focused nirsevimab programs are the most cost-effective option at current product prices.

Immunogenicity and Safety Following 1 Dose of AS01E-Adjuvanted Respiratory Syncytial Virus Prefusion F Protein Vaccine in Older Adults: A Phase 3 Trial.

BACKGROUND: The recently approved AS01E-adjuvanted respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) prefusion F protein-based vaccine for older adults (RSVPreF3 OA) demonstrated high efficacy against RSV-related disease in ≥60-year-olds. METHODS: This ongoing phase 3 study in ≥60-year-olds evaluates immune persistence until 3 years after RSVPreF3 OA vaccination. Here, we describe interim results on humoral and cell-mediated immunogenicity, reactogenicity, and safety until 1 year post-dose 1. RESULTS: In total, 1653 participants were vaccinated. One month post-dose 1, neutralization titers increased 10.5-fold (RSV-A) and 7.8-fold (RSV-B) vs pre-dose 1. Titers then declined to levels 4.4-fold (RSV-A) and 3.5-fold (RSV-B) above pre-dose 1 at month 6 and remained 3.1-fold (RSV-A) and 2.3-fold (RSV-B) above pre-dose 1 levels after 1 year. RSVPreF3-binding immunoglobulin G levels and CD4+ T-cell frequencies showed similar kinetics. Solicited administration-site and systemic adverse events (mostly mild to moderate and transient) were reported by 62.2% and 49.5% of participants. Serious adverse events were reported by 3.9% of participants within 6 months post-dose 1; 1 case was considered vaccine related. CONCLUSIONS: One RSVPreF3 OA dose elicited cell-mediated and RSV-A- and RSV-B-specific humoral immune responses that declined over time but remained above pre-dose 1 levels for at least 1 year. The vaccine was well tolerated with an acceptable safety profile. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT04732871 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a major cause of illness and hospitalization in older adults. An RSV vaccine for older adults developed by GSK was recently approved. The vaccine was well tolerated and provided protection against RSV disease in adults aged ≥60 years during at least 1 RSV season. In this ongoing study, we are evaluating the magnitude and durability of the immune response, as well as vaccine safety, until 3 years after vaccination of adults aged ≥60 years from 5 countries. Here, we report the results of an interim analysis until 1 year after vaccination with 1 dose. In total, 1653 participants were vaccinated. We found that the vaccine induced a strong immune response that was evident 1 month after vaccination, after which it declined but persisted for at least 1 year. Study participants most often reported pain at the injection site, muscle pain, tiredness, and headache as adverse reactions, which were mostly mild to moderate and of short duration. One serious adverse reaction was considered related to the vaccine. The long-term immune response that was observed in this study is consistent with the vaccine providing protection during at least 1 RSV season.

Potential impact of nirsevimab and bivalent maternal vaccine against RSV bronchiolitis in infants: A population-based modelling study.

BACKGROUND: A new monoclonal antibody (nirsevimab; Beyfortus®) and a bivalent prefusion RSV vaccine (Abrysvo®) for maternal immunization have been approved recently. This is a modelling study to estimate the potential impact of different immunization programs with these products on RSV-bronchiolitis. METHODS: Population-based real-world data from primary care and hospitalizations were considered. RSV bronchiolitis dynamics in absence of these immunization scenarios were explained by a multivariate age-structured Bayesian model. Then, the potential impact was simulated under different assumptions including the most recent clinical trial data. Differences in endpoints, populations, and timeframes between trials make the two products' efficacy difficult to compare. RESULTS: A seasonal with catch-up program, assuming a constant effectiveness of 79.5 % during the first 5 months followed by a linear decay to 0 by month 10 with nirsevimab, would prevent between 5121 and 8846 RSV bronchiolitis per 100,000 infants-years. Assuming 77.3 % effectiveness with the same decay, between 976 and 1686 RSV-hospitalizations per 100,000 infants-years could be prevented depending on the uptake. A year-round maternal immunization program, with 51 % of effectiveness during the first 6 months followed by a linear decay to 0 by month 10 would prevent between 3246 and 5606 RSV bronchiolitis cases per 100,000 infants-years. Assuming 56.9 % effectiveness with the same decay, between 713 and 1231 RSV-hospitalizations per 100,000 infants-years could be prevented. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that each strategy would effectively reduce RSV-bronchiolitis.

Filling two needs with one deed: a combinatory mucosal vaccine against influenza A virus and respiratory syncytial virus.

Influenza A Virus (IAV) and Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) are both responsible for millions of severe respiratory tract infections every year worldwide. Effective vaccines able to prevent transmission and severe disease, are important measures to reduce the burden for the global health system. Despite the strong systemic immune responses induced upon current parental immunizations, this vaccination strategy fails to promote a robust mucosal immune response. Here, we investigated the immunogenicity and efficacy of a mucosal adenoviral vector vaccine to tackle both pathogens simultaneously at their entry site. For this purpose, BALB/c mice were immunized intranasally with adenoviral vectors (Ad) encoding the influenza-derived proteins, hemagglutinin (HA) and nucleoprotein (NP), in combination with an Ad encoding for the RSV fusion (F) protein. The mucosal combinatory vaccine induced neutralizing antibodies as well as local IgA responses against both viruses. Moreover, the vaccine elicited pulmonary CD8+ and CD4+ tissue resident memory T cells (TRM) against the immunodominant epitopes of RSV-F and IAV-NP. Furthermore, the addition of Ad-TGFß or Ad-CCL17 as mucosal adjuvant enhanced the formation of functional CD8+ TRM responses against the conserved IAV-NP. Consequently, the combinatory vaccine not only provided protection against subsequent infections with RSV, but also against heterosubtypic challenges with pH1N1 or H3N2 strains. In conclusion, we present here a potent combinatory vaccine for mucosal applications, which provides protection against two of the most relevant respiratory viruses.

Passive Immunization Strategies to Prevent Severe Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection Among Newborns and Young Infants.

Newborns and young infants are at risk for severe respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) lower respiratory tract infection. Passive immunity is the mainstay of infection prevention in this cohort. Transplacental transfer of maternal antibodies provides the newborn with immediate protection from life-threatening infections, however, is dependent upon gestational age, birth weight, mother's age, recent maternal vaccination, maternal nutritional status, maternal immunocompetence and medical conditions, and placental integrity. Efficient transplacental transfer of RSV-neutralizing antibodies have led to the development and approval of maternal RSV immunization for the protection of the newborn. Additionally, administration of RSV-specific antibodies to infants leads to high serum titers of RSV-neutralizing antibodies and further protection from severe disease.

Cold-adapted influenza-vectored RSV vaccine protects BALB/c mice and cotton rats from RSV challenge.

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) remains the primary cause of lower respiratory tract infections, particularly in infants and the elderly. In this study, we employed reverse genetics to generate a chimeric influenza virus expressing neuraminidase-3F protein conjugate with three repeats of the RSV F protein protective epitope inserted into the NA gene of A/California/7/2009 ca (CA/AA ca), resulting in rFlu/RSV/NA-3F (hereafter, rFRN3). The expression of NA-3F protein was confirmed by Western blotting. The morphology and temperature-sensitive phenotype of rFRN3 were similar to CA/AA ca. Its immunogenicity and protective efficiency were evaluated in BALB/c mice and cotton rats. Intranasal administration of rFRN3 elicited robust humoral, cellular, and to some extent, mucosal immune responses. Compared to controls, rFRN3 protected animals from RSV infection, attenuated lung injury, and reduced viral titers in the nose and lungs post-RSV challenge. These results demonstrate that rFRN3 can trigger RSV-specific immune responses and thus exhibits potent protective efficacy. The "dual vaccine" approach of a cold-adapted influenza vector RSV vaccine will improve the prophylaxis of influenza and RSV infection. rFRN3 thus warrants further clinical investigations as a candidate RSV vaccine.

Efficacy and safety of vaccines to prevent respiratory syncytial virus infection in infants and older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy and safety of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccines in infants and older adults. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials that evaluated the efficacy of maternal RSV immunization against infections in infants, as well as the efficacy of RSV vaccines in older adults. The primary outcome was the vaccine efficacy against RSV-related lower respiratory tract disease (LRTD). Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria was used to evaluate the level of evidence. RESULTS: Ten trials were included in the review. For maternal vaccination, the RSV vaccine showed favourable efficacy against RSV-related LRTD (vaccine efficacy 57.3%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 31.3-73.5; low certainty) and RSV-related severe LRTD (vaccine efficacy 81.9%, 95% CI 56.8-92.4; moderate certainty) in infants within 90 days after birth. For older adults, Meta-analysis showed that RSV vaccines could also reduce the risk of RSV-related LRTD (vaccine efficacy 78.3%, 95% CI 65.6-86.3; moderate certainty) and RSV-related severe LRTD (vaccine efficacy 86.5%, 95% CI 68.3-94.3; moderate certainty). There was no significant difference in serious adverse events between RSV vaccines and placebo. CONCLUSION: RSV vaccines have the potential to offer protection against RSV disease in both infants and older adults, without apparent safety concerns.

Opportunities and challenges to the development and deployment of vaccines for pregnant women in Germany.

Maternal immunisation is a powerful tool to protect both pregnant women and their children. A new maternal RSV vaccine holds promise to protect newborns from RSV-associated illness in the first few months of life, but no official recommendation has been made in Germany. Since RSV causes a significant burden of paediatric hospital admissions, we consider it a pertinent opportunity to review barriers to maternal vaccination in Germany, which might also apply to other settings. Access to vaccination for pregnant women in Germany is shaped by an interplay of legal, regulatory, institutional, and sociocultural factors, with a less permissive clinical research environment, delays in recommendation and roll-out, and lower acceptance by healthcare professionals and the population. Actionable recommendations to improve availability and uptake include coordination with other national regulatory bodies to reduce delays, awareness and literacy campaigns for health professionals and the general public, and capacity building for vaccine clinical research.

Vaccine preparation time, errors, satisfaction, and preference of prefilled syringes versus RSV vaccines requiring reconstitution: randomized, time and motion study.

AIM: The current study compared preparation time, errors, satisfaction, and preference for a prefilled syringe (PFS) versus two RSV vaccines requiring reconstitution (VRR1 and VRR2) in a randomized, single-blinded time and motion study. METHODS: Pharmacists, nurses, and pharmacy technicians were randomized to a preparation sequence of the three vaccines. Participants read instructions, then consecutively prepared the three vaccines with a 3-5-min washout period in between. Preparations were video recorded and reviewed by a trained pharmacist for preparation time and errors using predefined, vaccine-specific checklists. Participant demographics, satisfaction with vaccine preparation, and vaccine preference were recorded. Within-subjects analysis of variance was used to compare preparation time. Mixed-effects Poisson and ordered logistic regression models were used to compare the number of preparation errors and satisfaction scores, respectively. RESULTS: Sixty-three pharmacists (60%), nurses (35%), and pharmacy technicians (5%) participated at four sites in the United States. The least squares mean preparation time per dose for PFS was 141.8 s (95% CI = 156.8-126.7; p <.0001) faster than for VRR1, 103.6 s (95% CI = 118.7-88.5; p <.0001) faster than for VRR2, and 122.7 s (95% CI = 134.2-111.2; p <.0001) faster than the pooled VRRs. Overall satisfaction (combined "Very" and "Extremely") was 87.3% for PFS, 28.6% for VRR1, and 47.6% for VRR2. Most participants (81.0%) preferred the PFS vaccine. LIMITATIONS: The study is limited by the inability to completely blind observers. To minimize the effects of order, we utilized a 3-sequence block design; however, the order in which the vaccines were prepared may have affected outcomes. Participants were assessed once, whereas if repeated preparations were performed there may have been trained efficiencies gained for each vaccine. CONCLUSION: PFS vaccines can greatly simplify the vaccine preparation process, allowing administrators to prepare almost four times more doses per hour than with vial and syringe systems.

Intranasal Vaccination with a Respiratory-Syncytial-Virus-Based Virus-like Particle Displaying the G Protein Conserved Region Induces Severe Weight Loss and Pathology upon Challenge with Wildtype Respiratory Syncytial Virus.

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a major cause of severe respiratory tract disease worldwide, and a pediatric vaccine is not available. We generated a filamentous RSV-based virus-like particle (VLP) that presents the central conserved region of the attachment protein G. This was achieved by co-expressing the matrix protein, phosphoprotein, nucleoprotein, and a hybrid fusion protein in which the F ectodomain was replaced with the G central region (GCR). The latter is relatively conserved and contains a receptor binding site and hence is a logical vaccine target. The immunogenicity and efficacy of the resulting VLP, termed VLP-GCR, were examined in mice using intranasal application without adjuvant. VLP-GCR induced substantial anti-N antibody levels but very low anti-G antibody levels, even after three vaccinations. In contrast, a VLP presenting prefusion-stabilized fusion (preF) protein instead of GCR induced both high anti-F and anti-nucleoprotein antibody levels, suggesting that our GCR antigen was poorly immunogenic. Challenge of VLP-GCR-vaccinated mice caused increased weight loss and lung pathology, and both VLPs induced mucus in the lungs. Thus, neither VLP is suitable as a vaccine for RSV-naive individuals. However, VLP-preF enhanced the proportion of preF antibodies and could serve as a multi-antigen mucosal booster vaccine in the RSV-experienced population.