An Open-Label Phase II Study Assessing the Safety of Bilateral, Sequential Administration of Retinal Gene Therapy in Participants with Choroideremia: The GEMINI Study.

Choroideremia, an incurable, progressive retinal degeneration primarily affecting young men, leads to sight loss. GEMINI was a multicenter, open-label, prospective, two-period, interventional Phase II study assessing the safety of bilateral sequential administration of timrepigene emparvovec, a gene therapy, in adult males with genetically confirmed choroideremia (NCT03507686, ClinicalTrials.gov). Timrepigene emparvovec is an adeno-associated virus serotype 2 vector encoding the cDNA of Rab escort protein 1, augmented by a downstream woodchuck hepatitis virus post-transcriptional regulatory element. Up to 0.1 mL of timrepigene emparvovec, containing 1 × 1011 vector genomes, was administered by subretinal injection following vitrectomy and retinal detachment. The second eye was treated after an intrasurgery window of <6, 6-12, or >12 months. Each eye was followed at up to nine visits over 12 months. Overall, 66 participants received timrepigene emparvovec, and 53 completed the study. Visual acuity (VA) was generally maintained in both eyes, independent of intrasurgery window duration, even after bilateral retinal detachment and subretinal injection. Bilateral treatment was well tolerated, with predominantly mild or moderate treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and a low rate of serious surgical complications (7.6%). Retinal inflammation TEAEs were reported in 45.5% of participants, with similar rates in both eyes; post hoc analyses found that these were not associated with clinically significant vision loss at month 12 versus baseline. Two participants (3.0%) reported serious noninfective retinitis. Prior timrepigene emparvovec exposure did not increase the risk of serious TEAEs or serious ocular TEAEs upon injection of the second eye; furthermore, no systemic immune reaction or inoculation effect was observed. Presence of antivector neutralizing antibodies at baseline was potentially associated with a higher percentage of TEAEs related to ocular inflammation or reduced VA after injection of the first eye. The GEMINI study results may inform decisions regarding bilateral sequential administration of other gene therapies for retinal diseases.

Improving the Assessment of Risk Factors Relevant to Potential Carcinogenicity of Gene Therapies: A Consensus Article.

Regulators and industry are actively seeking improvements and alternatives to current models and approaches to evaluate potential carcinogenicity of gene therapies (GTs). A meeting of invited experts was organized by NC3Rs/UKEMS (London, March 2023) to discuss this topic. This article describes the consensus reached among delegates on the definition of vector genotoxicity, sources of uncertainty, suitable toxicological endpoints for genotoxic assessment of GTs, and future research needs. The collected recommendations should inform the further development of regulatory guidelines for the nonclinical toxicological assessment of GT products.

[How safe is gene therapy? : Second death after Duchenne therapy]. / Wie sicher ist die Gentherapie? : Zweiter Todesfall nach Therapie der Duchenne-Muskeldystrophie.

BACKGROUND: Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a severe monogenic hereditary disease with early manifestation and a progressive course. Treatment options have so far been limited. Gene therapy opens up new options for DMD patients. OBJECTIVES: Against the background of a further death following DMD gene therapy, the side effects and risks of the gene therapeutics already approved or undergoing clinical trials will be evaluated and alternative gene therapeutics will be described. Based thereon, the future of DMD gene therapy will be discussed. CURRENT DATA: For the first time, in June 2023, delandistrogene moxeparvovec (SRP-9001), a gene replacement therapy based on an adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector, was approved in the USA for children aged 4-5 years with DMD. Other promising gene therapies are in preclinical development or clinical trials, including CRISPR/Cas9-mediated strategies to restore dystrophin expression. Two deaths following DMD gene therapy with high-dose AAV vectors were attributed to AAV-mediated immune responses. The pre-existing disease underlying the therapy is most likely involved in the fatal AAV toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Although gene therapy applications of AAV vectors are generally considered safe, the systemic administration of high vector doses can lead to severe side effects with a potentially fatal outcome in individual patients, especially after activation of the immune system. In the future, new methods for immunosuppression, reduction of AAV dose and alternative vectors will therefore increasingly come to the fore.

Assessment of Visual Function with Cotoretigene Toliparvovec in X-Linked Retinitis Pigmentosa in the Randomized XIRIUS Phase 2/3 Study.

PURPOSE: Cotoretigene toliparvovec (BIIB112/AAV8-RPGR) is an investigational vector-based gene therapy designed to provide a full-length, codon-optimized retinitis pigmentosa GTPase regulator (RPGR) protein to individuals with RPGR-associated X-linked retinitis pigmentosa (XLRP). We assessed efficacy and tolerability of cotoretigene toliparvovec subretinal gene therapy. DESIGN: Part 2 of the XIRIUS trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03116113) was a phase 2/3, 12-month, randomized (1:1:1) dose-expansion study. PARTICIPANTS: Male patients ≥10 years of age with RPGR-associated XLRP were included. METHODS: Participants were randomized 1:1:1 to receive low-dose subretinal cotoretigene toliparvovec (5 × 1010 vector genomes/eye), high-dose cotoretigene toliparvovec (2.5 × 1011 vector genomes/eye) or to be an untreated control participant. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was the percentage of participants meeting microperimetry responder criteria (≥ 7-dB improvement at ≥ 5 of 16 central loci). Secondary end points included change from baseline in retinal sensitivity at the central 16 loci and the entire 68 loci at 12 months and change from baseline in low-luminance visual acuity (LLVA) at 12 months, as well as the proportion of eyes with a ≥ 15-Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study ETDRS letter LLVA and ≥ 10-ETDRS letter LLVA change from baseline at month 12. RESULTS: Because of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, enrollment ended before reaching the initial target, leaving the trial underpowered. Twenty-nine participants were included (low-dose group, n = 10; high-dose group, n = 10; control group, n = 9). At month 12, the percentage of participants meeting microperimetry responder criteria was not significantly different between either cotoretigene toliparvovec group (low dose, 37.5% [P = 0.3181]; high dose, 25.0% [P = 0.5177]) and the control group (22.2%). However, the mean change from baseline in microperimetry sensitivity improved significantly with the low-dose group versus the control group at month 12 (P = 0.0350). Significant improvement in LLVA occurred in the low-dose group versus the control group at month 12 (33.3% difference [80% confidence interval, 14.7%-55.2%]; P = 0.0498). Three ocular-related serious adverse events (SAEs) occurred in the low-dose group versus 7 SAEs in the high-dose group. CONCLUSIONS: The primary microperimetry end point was not met. Significant improvements in LLVA and mean microperimetry were observed compared with controls and fewer SAEs occured with low-dose compared with high dose cotoretigene toliparvovec. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Efficacy and Safety of Adeno-Associated Virus-Based Clinical Gene Therapy for Hemophilia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Clinical trials of adeno-associated virus (AAV)-based gene therapy have made remarkable progress in recent years. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to assess the efficacy and safety of AAV-based gene therapy for hemophilia. We systematically searched the Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews databases, for clinical trials involving patients diagnosed with hemophilia and treated with AAV-mediated gene therapy. Data on the annualized bleeding rate (ABR), annualized infusion rate (AIR), the incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), severe adverse events (SAEs), and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation were extracted as our outcomes. A total of 12 articles from 11 clinical trials were selected from 868 articles for meta-analysis. Pooled analyses showed that AAV-based gene therapy in hemophilia patients reduced the number of bleeding events and the number of factor infusion events by an approximate average of 7 per year and 103 per year, respectively. Eighty percent, 18%, and 63% of hemophilia patients had elevated TRAE, SAE, and ALT levels, respectively. Moreover, subgroup analysis found a significant reduction in ABR and AIR 2-3 years after the therapy. Additional findings that were not pooled including coagulation factor activity are presented in the accompanying tables. Our analysis supported the efficacy and safety of AAV-mediated gene therapy for hemophilia, providing evidence for its application as a therapeutic option for widespread clinical use in hemophilia patients in the future.

Complement System Response to Adeno-Associated Virus Vector Gene Therapy.

Adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors represent a novel tool for the delivery of genetic therapeutics and enable the treatment of a wide range of diseases. Success of this new modality is challenged, however, by cases of immune-related toxicities that complicate the clinical management of patients and potentially limit the therapeutic efficacy of AAV gene therapy. While significant progress has been made to manage immune-related liver enzyme elevations following systemic AAV delivery in humans, recent clinical trials utilizing high vector doses have highlighted a new challenge to AAV gene transfer-activation of the complement system. While current in vitro models implicate AAV-specific antibodies in the initiation of the classical complement pathway, evidence from in vivo pre-clinical and clinical studies suggests that the alternative pathway also contributes to complement activation. A convergence of AAV-specific, environmental, and patient-specific factors shaping complement responses likely contributes to differential outcomes seen in clinical trials, from priming of the adaptive immune system to serious adverse events such as hepatotoxicity and thrombotic microangiopathy. Research focused on the interplay of patient-specific and AAV-related factors driving complement activation is needed to understand and identify critical components in the complement cascade to target and devise strategies to mitigate vector-related immune responses.

Safety concerns surrounding AAV and CRISPR therapies in neuromuscular treatment.

Gene therapies, notably those leveraging CRISPR and adeno-associated virus vectors (AAVs), have risen to the forefront of potential treatments for neuromuscular disorders. The recent demise of a Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) patient following a trial utilizing CRISPR transactivation with AAV has cast a spotlight on the potential risks associated with these approaches.1.

Lethal immunotoxicity in high-dose systemic AAV therapy.

High-dose systemic gene therapy with adeno-associated virus (AAV) is in clinical trials to treat various inherited diseases. Despite remarkable success in spinal muscular atrophy and promising results in other diseases, fatality has been observed due to liver, kidney, heart, or lung failure. Innate and adaptive immune responses to the vector play a critical role in the toxicity. Host factors also contribute to patient death. This mini-review summarizes clinical findings and calls for concerted efforts from all stakeholders to better understand the mechanisms underlying lethality in AAV gene therapy and to develop effective strategies to prevent/treat high-dose systemic AAV-gene-therapy-induced immunotoxicity.

Lentiviral Gene Therapy for Artemis-Deficient SCID.

BACKGROUND: The DNA-repair enzyme Artemis is essential for rearrangement of T- and B-cell receptors. Mutations in DCLRE1C, which encodes Artemis, cause Artemis-deficient severe combined immunodeficiency (ART-SCID), which is poorly responsive to allogeneic hematopoietic-cell transplantation. METHODS: We carried out a phase 1-2 clinical study of the transfusion of autologous CD34+ cells, transfected with a lentiviral vector containing DCLRE1C, in 10 infants with newly diagnosed ART-SCID. We followed them for a median of 31.2 months. RESULTS: Marrow harvest, busulfan conditioning, and lentiviral-transduced CD34+ cell infusion produced the expected grade 3 or 4 adverse events. All the procedures met prespecified criteria for feasibility at 42 days after infusion. Gene-marked T cells were detected at 6 to 16 weeks after infusion in all the patients. Five of 6 patients who were followed for at least 24 months had T-cell immune reconstitution at a median of 12 months. The diversity of T-cell receptor ß chains normalized by 6 to 12 months. Four patients who were followed for at least 24 months had sufficient B-cell numbers, IgM concentration, or IgM isohemagglutinin titers to permit discontinuation of IgG infusions. Three of these 4 patients had normal immunization responses, and the fourth has started immunizations. Vector insertion sites showed no evidence of clonal expansion. One patient who presented with cytomegalovirus infection received a second infusion of gene-corrected cells to achieve T-cell immunity sufficient for viral clearance. Autoimmune hemolytic anemia developed in 4 patients 4 to 11 months after infusion; this condition resolved after reconstitution of T-cell immunity. All 10 patients were healthy at the time of this report. CONCLUSIONS: Infusion of lentiviral gene-corrected autologous CD34+ cells, preceded by pharmacologically targeted low-exposure busulfan, in infants with newly diagnosed ART-SCID resulted in genetically corrected and functional T and B cells. (Funded by the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03538899.).

rAAV immunogenicity, toxicity, and durability in 255 clinical trials: A meta-analysis.

Recombinant Adeno-associated virus (rAAV) is one of the main delivery vectors for gene therapy. To assess immunogenicity, toxicity, and features of AAV gene therapy in clinical settings, a meta-analysis of 255 clinical trials was performed. A total of 7,289 patients are planned to be dosed. AAV2 was the most dominantly used serotype (29.8%, n=72), and 8.3% (n=20) of trials used engineered capsids. 38.7% (n=91) of trials employed neutralizing antibody assays for patient enrollment, while 15.3% (n=36) used ELISA-based total antibody assays. However, there was high variability in the eligibility criteria with cut-off tiers ranging from 1:1 to 1:1,600. To address potential immunogenicity, 46.3% (n=118) of trials applied immunosuppressants (prophylactic or reactive), while 32.7% (n=18) of CNS and 37.5% (n=24) of ocular-directed trials employed immunosuppressants, possibly due to the immune-privileged status of CNS and retina. There were a total of 11 patient deaths across 8 trials, and 18 out of 30 clinical holds were due to toxicity findings in clinical studies. 30.6% (n=78) of trials had treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs), with hepatotoxicity and thrombotic microangiopathy (systemic delivery) and neurotoxicity (CNS delivery) being the most prominent. Additionally, the durability of gene therapy may be impacted by two distinct decline mechanisms: 1) rapid decline presumably due to immune responses; or 2) gradual decline due to vector dilution. The durability varied significantly depending on disease indication, dose, serotypes, and patient individuals. Most CNS (90.0%) and muscle trials (73.3%) achieved durable transgene expression, while only 43.6% of ocular trials had sustained clinical outcomes. The rAAV production system can affect rAAV quality and thus immunogenicity and toxicity. Out of 186 trials that have disclosed production system information, 63.0% (n=126) of trials used the transient transfection of the HEK293/HEK293T system, while 18.0% (n=36) applied the baculovirus/Sf9 (rBac/Sf9) system. There were no significant differences in TESAEs and durability between AAV generated by rBac/Sf9 and HEK293/HEK293T systems. In summary, rAAV immunogenicity and toxicity poses significant challenges for clinical development of rAAV gene therapies, and it warrants collaborative efforts to standardize monitoring/measurement methods, design novel strategies to overcome immune responses, and openly share relevant information.

Adeno-Associated Viruses (AAV) and Host Immunity - A Race Between the Hare and the Hedgehog.

Adeno-associated viruses (AAV) have emerged as the lead vector in clinical trials and form the basis for several approved gene therapies for human diseases, mainly owing to their ability to sustain robust and long-term in vivo transgene expression, their amenability to genetic engineering of cargo and capsid, as well as their moderate toxicity and immunogenicity. Still, recent reports of fatalities in a clinical trial for a neuromuscular disease, although linked to an exceptionally high vector dose, have raised new caution about the safety of recombinant AAVs. Moreover, concerns linger about the presence of pre-existing anti-AAV antibodies in the human population, which precludes a significant percentage of patients from receiving, and benefitting from, AAV gene therapies. These concerns are exacerbated by observations of cellular immune responses and other adverse events, including detrimental off-target transgene expression in dorsal root ganglia. Here, we provide an update on our knowledge of the immunological and molecular race between AAV (the "hedgehog") and its human host (the "hare"), together with a compendium of state-of-the-art technologies which provide an advantage to AAV and which, thus, promise safer and more broadly applicable AAV gene therapies in the future.

Biodistribution of onasemnogene abeparvovec DNA, mRNA and SMN protein in human tissue.

Spinal muscular atrophy type 1 (SMA1) is a debilitating neurodegenerative disease resulting from survival motor neuron 1 gene (SMN1) deletion/mutation. Onasemnogene abeparvovec (formerly AVXS-101) is a gene therapy that restores SMN production via one-time systemic administration. The present study demonstrates widespread biodistribution of vector genomes and transgenes throughout the central nervous system (CNS) and peripheral organs, after intravenous administration of an AAV9-mediated gene therapy. Two symptomatic infants with SMA1 enrolled in phase III studies received onasemnogene abeparvovec. Both patients died of respiratory complications unrelated to onasemnogene abeparvovec. One patient had improved motor function and the other died shortly after administration before appreciable clinical benefit could be observed. In both patients, onasemnogene abeparvovec DNA and messenger RNA distribution were widespread among peripheral organs and in the CNS. The greatest concentration of vector genomes was detected in the liver, with an increase over that detected in CNS tissues of 300-1,000-fold. SMN protein, which was low in an untreated SMA1 control, was clearly detectable in motor neurons, brain, skeletal muscle and multiple peripheral organs in treated patients. These data support the fact that onasemnogene abeparvovec has effective distribution, transduction and expression throughout the CNS after intravenous administration and restores SMN expression in humans.

Coagulopathies after Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 May Be Derived from a Combined Effect of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein and Adenovirus Vector-Triggered Signaling Pathways.

Novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 has resulted in a global pandemic with worldwide 6-digit infection rates and thousands of death tolls daily. Enormous efforts are undertaken to achieve high coverage of immunization to reach herd immunity in order to stop the spread of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Several SARS-CoV-2 vaccines based on mRNA, viral vectors, or inactivated SARS-CoV-2 virus have been approved and are being applied worldwide. However, the recent increased numbers of normally very rare types of thromboses associated with thrombocytopenia have been reported, particularly in the context of the adenoviral vector vaccine ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 from Astra Zeneca. The statistical prevalence of these side effects seems to correlate with this particular vaccine type, i.e., adenoviral vector-based vaccines, but the exact molecular mechanisms are still not clear. The present review summarizes current data and hypotheses for molecular and cellular mechanisms into one integrated hypothesis indicating that coagulopathies, including thromboses, thrombocytopenia, and other related side effects, are correlated to an interplay of the two components in the vaccine, i.e., the spike antigen and the adenoviral vector, with the innate and immune systems, which under certain circumstances can imitate the picture of a limited COVID-19 pathological picture.

Insights in ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia.

SARS-CoV-2 vaccine ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AstraZeneca) causes a thromboembolic complication termed vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT). Using biophysical techniques, mouse models, and analysis of VITT patient samples, we identified determinants of this vaccine-induced adverse reaction. Super-resolution microscopy visualized vaccine components forming antigenic complexes with platelet factor 4 (PF4) on platelet surfaces to which anti-PF4 antibodies obtained from VITT patients bound. PF4/vaccine complex formation was charge-driven and increased by addition of DNA. Proteomics identified substantial amounts of virus production-derived T-REx HEK293 proteins in the ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)-containing vaccine. Injected vaccine increased vascular leakage in mice, leading to systemic dissemination of vaccine components known to stimulate immune responses. Together, PF4/vaccine complex formation and the vaccine-stimulated proinflammatory milieu trigger a pronounced B-cell response that results in the formation of high-avidity anti-PF4 antibodies in VITT patients. The resulting high-titer anti-PF4 antibodies potently activated platelets in the presence of PF4 or DNA and polyphosphate polyanions. Anti-PF4 VITT patient antibodies also stimulated neutrophils to release neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) in a platelet PF4-dependent manner. Biomarkers of procoagulant NETs were elevated in VITT patient serum, and NETs were visualized in abundance by immunohistochemistry in cerebral vein thrombi obtained from VITT patients. Together, vaccine-induced PF4/adenovirus aggregates and proinflammatory reactions stimulate pathologic anti-PF4 antibody production that drives thrombosis in VITT. The data support a 2-step mechanism underlying VITT that resembles the pathogenesis of (autoimmune) heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Gene therapy for hemophilia: Current status and laboratory consequences.

Since the cloning and characterization of the factor VIII (FVIII) and factor IX genes in the mid-1980s, gene therapy has been perceived as having significant potential for the treatment of severe hemophilia. Now, some 35 years later, these proposals are close to being realized through the licensing of the first clinical gene therapy product. Adeno-associated viral vector-mediated gene therapy for hemophilia A and B has been extensively investigated in preclinical models over the past 20 years, and since 2011, there has been increasing evidence in early phase clinical trials that this therapeutic strategy can provide safe and effective rescue of the hemostatic phenotype in severe hemophilia. As the uptake of hemophilia gene therapy progresses, it is clear that many aspects of the gene therapy process require crucial laboratory support to ensure safe and effective outcomes from his new therapeutic paradigm. These laboratory contributions extend from evaluations of the gene therapy vehicle, assessments of the patient immune status for the vector, and ultimately the performance of assays to determine the hemostatic benefit of the gene therapy and potentially of its long-term safety on the host genome. As with many aspects of past hemophilia care, the safe and effective delivery of gene therapy will require an informed and coordinated contribution from laboratory science.

Predicting genotoxicity of viral vectors for stem cell gene therapy using gene expression-based machine learning.

Hematopoietic stem cell gene therapy is emerging as a promising therapeutic strategy for many diseases of the blood and immune system. However, several individuals who underwent gene therapy in different trials developed hematological malignancies caused by insertional mutagenesis. Preclinical assessment of vector safety remains challenging because there are few reliable assays to screen for potential insertional mutagenesis effects in vitro. Here we demonstrate that genotoxic vectors induce a unique gene expression signature linked to stemness and oncogenesis in transduced murine hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Based on this finding, we developed the surrogate assay for genotoxicity assessment (SAGA). SAGA classifies integrating retroviral vectors using machine learning to detect this gene expression signature during the course of in vitro immortalization. On a set of benchmark vectors with known genotoxic potential, SAGA achieved an accuracy of 90.9%. SAGA is more robust and sensitive and faster than previous assays and reliably predicts a mutagenic risk for vectors that led to leukemic severe adverse events in clinical trials. Our work provides a fast and robust tool for preclinical risk assessment of gene therapy vectors, potentially paving the way for safer gene therapy trials.

Gene Therapy for Mucopolysaccharidosis Type II-A Review of the Current Possibilities.

Mucopolysaccharidosis type II (MPS II) is a lysosomal storage disorder based on a mutation in the IDS gene that encodes iduronate 2-sulphatase. As a result, there is an accumulation of glycosaminoglycans-heparan sulphate and dermatan sulphate-in almost all body tissues, which leads to their dysfunction. Currently, the primary treatment is enzyme replacement therapy, which improves the course of the disease by reducing somatic symptoms, including hepatomegaly and splenomegaly. The enzyme, however, does not cross the blood-brain barrier, and no improvement in the function of the central nervous system has been observed in patients with the severe form of the disease. An alternative method of treatment that solves typical problems of enzyme replacement therapy is gene therapy, i.e., delivery of the correct gene to target cells through an appropriate vector. Much progress has been made in applying gene therapy for MPS II, from cellular models to human clinical trials. In this article, we briefly present the history and basics of gene therapy and discuss the current state of knowledge about the methods of this therapy in mucopolysaccharidosis type II.

Cell-Mediated Immunity to NAGLU Transgene Following Intracerebral Gene Therapy in Children With Mucopolysaccharidosis Type IIIB Syndrome.

Mucopolysaccharidosis type IIIB syndrome (Sanfilippo disease) is a rare autosomic recessif disorder caused by mutations in the α-N-acetylglucosaminidase (NAGLU) gene coding for a lysosomal enzyme, leading to neurodegeneration and progressive deterioration of cognitive abilities in affected children. To supply the missing enzyme, several recent human gene therapy trials relied on the deposit of adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors directly into the brain. We reported safety and efficacy of an intracerebral therapy in a phase 1/2 clinical trial (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03300453), with a recombinant AAV serotype 2/5 (rAAV2/5) coding human NAGLU in four children with MPS IIIB syndrome receiving immunosuppression. It was reported that AAV-mediated gene therapies might elicit a strong host immune response resulting in decreased transgene expression. To address this issue, we performed a comprehensive analysis of cellular immunity and cytokine patterns generated against the therapeutic enzyme in the four treated children over 5.5 years of follow-up. We report the emergence of memory and polyfunctional CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes sensitized to the transgene soon after the start of therapy, and appearing in peripheral blood in waves throughout the follow-up. However, this response had no apparent impact on CNS transgene expression, which remained stable 66 months after surgery, possibly a consequence of the long-term immunosuppressive treatment. We also report that gene therapy did not trigger neuroinflammation, evaluated through the expression of cytokines and chemokines in patients' CSF. Milder disease progression in the youngest patient was found associated with low level and less differentiated circulating NAGLU-specific T cells, together with the lack of proinflammatory cytokines in the CSF. Findings in this study support a systematic and comprehensive immunomonitoring approach for understanding the impact immune reactions might have on treatment safety and efficacy of gene therapies.

Tissue and cell-type-specific transduction using rAAV vectors in lung diseases.

Gene therapy of genetically determined diseases, including some pathologies of the respiratory system, requires an efficient method for transgene delivery. Recombinant adeno-associated viral (rAAV) vectors are well studied and employed in gene therapy, as they are relatively simple and low immunogenic and able to efficiently transduce eukaryotic cells. To date, many natural and artificial (with modified capsids) AAV serotypes have been isolated, demonstrating preferential tropism toward different tissues and cells in accordance with the prevalent receptors on the cell surface. However, rAAV-mediated delivery is not strictly specific due to wide tropism of some viral serotypes. Thus, the development of the methods allowing modulating specificity of these vectors could be beneficial in some cases. This review describes various approaches for retargeting rAAV to respiratory cells, for example, using different types of capsid modifications and regulation of a transgene expression by tissue-specific promoters. Part of the review is devoted to the issues of transduction of stem and progenitor lung cells using AAV, which is a complicated task today.