Therapeutic efficacy and pharmacological mechanism of Bailing capsule on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a meta-analysis and network pharmacology.

CONTEXT: Bailing capsule, derived from Cordyceps sinensis (Berk.) Sacc. (Clavicipitaceae), has shown potential in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), a prevalent respiratory disorder. OBJECTIVE: This study elucidates the efficacy and mechanism of action of the use of Bailing capsules in the treatment of COPD using meta-analysis and network pharmacology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed. The treatment group received Bailing capsules alongside standard therapy, while the control group received standard therapy or in combination with other traditional Chinese medicines. Efficacy outcomes included lung function, exercise tolerance, acute exacerbation risk, and quality of life. Network pharmacology and molecular docking identified key targets of Bailing capsules. RESULTS: The meta-analysis of 27 RCTs showed significant improvements in the treatment group for forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), FEV1/FVC ratio, and the 6-min walk test (6MWT). Additionally, there was a marked reduction in acute COPD attacks and an improvement in quality of life. Meanwhile, network pharmacological analysis identified SRC, HIF1A, NFKB1, HDAC2, and PRKACA, as the potential core targets for Bailing capsules in the treatment of COPD. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Bailing capsules have shown promising results in the treatment of stable COPD. Future studies should focus on large-scale, multicenter RCTs to confirm the long-term benefits and safety of Bailing capsules.

Ambient air pollution, low-grade inflammation, and lung function: Evidences from the UK Biobank.

The associations of ambient air pollution exposure and low-grade inflammation with lung function remain uncertain. In this study, 276,289 subjects were enrolled in the UK Biobank. Individual exposure to ambient air pollution (including nitrogen dioxide [NO2], nitrogen oxides [NOx]), and particulate matter [PM2.5, PM10, PMcoarse]) were estimated by using the land-use regression model. Forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) were tested, and low-grade inflammation score (INFLA score) was calculated for each subject. In this cross-sectional study, the median concentrations of air pollution were 9.89 µg/m3 for PM2.5, 15.98 µg/m3 for PM10, 6.09 µg/m3 for PMcoarse, 25.60 µg/m3 for NO2, and 41.46 µg/m3 for NOx, respectively. We observed that PM2.5, PM10, PMcoarse, NO2, NOx was negatively associated with lung function. Besides, significant positive associations between PM exposure and low-grade inflammation were noted. Per interquartile range (IQR) increase in PM2.5, PM10, and PMcoarse was related to higher INFLA score, and the ß (95 % CI) was 0.06 (0.03, 0.08), 0.03 (0.02, 0.05), and 0.03 (0.01, 0.04), respectively. Additionally, we found significant negative associations between INFLA scores and lung function. One-unit increase in INFLA score was linked with 12.41- and 11.31-ml decreases in FVC and FEV1, respectively. Compared with individuals with low air pollution exposure and low INFLA scores, participants with high air pollution and high INFLA scores had the lowest FVC and FEV1. Additionally, we observed that INFLA scores could modify the relationships of PM2.5, NO2, and NOx with FVC and FEV1 (Pinteraction <0.05). The negative impact of air pollutants on lung function was more pronounced in subjects with high INFLA scores in comparison to those with low INFLA scores. In conclusion, we demonstrated negative associations between ambient air pollution and lung function, and the observed associations were strengthened and modified by low-grade inflammation.

The effect of nebulized N-acetylcysteine on the phlegm of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the NEWEST study.

BACKGROUND: Phlegm is prevalent symptom in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Few studies have investigated the effectiveness of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) nebulizer therapy in COPD patients. We evaluated the effect of nebulized NAC on the improvement of phlegm symptom in COPD patients. METHODS: This was a 12-week, prospective, single-arm, open-label, phase IV multi-center trial (NCT05102305, Registration Date: 20-October-2021). We enrolled patients aged ≥ 40 years with post bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) < 0.7 and COPD assessment test (CAT) phlegm score ≥ 2; the patients were current or ex-smoker with smoking pack-years ≥ 10. The primary endpoint was to determine the change in CAT phlegm score at 12 weeks compared to the baseline. Patients were assessed at baseline, 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment using the CAT score. RESULTS: In total, 100 COPD patients were enrolled from 10 hospitals. The mean age of the patients was 71.42 ± 8.20 years, with 19.78% being current-smokers and 80.22% being ex-smokers. The mean smoking pack-years was 40.32 ± 35.18. The mean FVC, FEV1, and FEV1/FVC were 3.94 L (75.44%), 2.22 L (58.50%), and 0.53, respectively. The CAT phlegm score at baseline was 3.47 ± 1.06, whereas after 12 weeks of nebulized NAC it significantly decreased to 2.62 ± 1.30 (p < 0.01). More than half (53.5%) of the patients expressed satisfaction with the effects of nebulized NAC therapy. Adverse events occurred in 8 (8.0%) patients. Notably, no serious adverse drug reactions were reported. CONCLUSION: In this study, we have established the effectiveness and safety of nebulized NAC over 12 weeks.

Small airways response to bronchodilators as the marker of the uncontrolled asthma in children.

OBJECTIVE: Aim: To develop the criteria of small airways response to bronchodilators (by spirometry indices maximal expiratory flow (MEF50 and MEF25) as the markers of uncontrolled asthma course. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and Methods: The study involved 92 participants (64 boys and 28 girls) aged 6 to 17 years (60 were less than 12 years old) with diagnosed asthma. Asthma control was assessed with the use of Asthma Control Test and Asthma Control Questionnaire. Spirometry and bronchodilator responsiveness testing were performed for all participants. RESULTS: Results: Mostly, the studied children had a normal level of forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1), even at unsatisfactory symptoms control. The indicators of the medium and small airways patency were significantly worse in uncontrolled asthma children even in normal FEV1. Among children, the lack of asthma control can be caused by small airways obstruction in up to 80% cases. Among children who need the high dose inhaled corticosteroids treatment 93.3% have uncontrolled asthma with small airways obstruction. We found out that MEF50 and MEF25 could be the signs of the reversibility of bronchial obstruction and uncontrolled asthma with high sensitivity and specificity. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: Indices MEF50 and MEF25 allow detecting the small airways obstruction and their reversibility as a mark of uncontrolled asthma (MEF25 has a higher diagnostic value). In case of MEF50 and/or MEF25 increasing for 22% or 25% accordingly in bronchodilator test in children, the asthma should be considered uncontrolled.

Effect of high-dose N-acetylcysteine on exacerbations and lung function in patients with mild-to-moderate COPD: a double-blind, parallel group, multicentre randomised clinical trial.

Evidence for the treatment of patients with mild-to-moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is limited. The efficacy of N-acetylcysteine (an antioxidant and mucolytic agent) for patients with mild-to-moderate COPD is uncertain. In this multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned 968 patients with mild-to-moderate COPD to treatment with N-acetylcysteine (600 mg, twice daily) or matched placebo for two years. Eligible participants were 40-80 years of age and had mild-to-moderate COPD (forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1] to forced vital capacity ratio <0.70 and an FEV1 ≥ 50% predicted value after bronchodilator use). The coprimary outcomes were the annual rate of total exacerbations and the between-group difference in the change from baseline to 24 months in FEV1 before bronchodilator use. COPD exacerbation was defined as the appearance or worsening of at least two major symptoms (cough, expectoration, purulent sputum, wheezing, or dyspnoea) persisting for at least 48 hours. Assessment of exacerbations was conducted every three months, and lung function was performed annually after enrolment. The difference between the N-acetylcysteine group and the placebo group in the annual rate of total exacerbation were not significant (0.65 vs. 0.72 per patient-year; relative risk [RR], 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80-1.02; P = 0.10). There was no significant difference in FEV1 before bronchodilator use at 24 months. Long-term treatment with high-dose N-acetylcysteine neither significantly reduced the annual rate of total exacerbations nor improved lung function in patients with mild-to-moderate COPD. Chinese Clinical Trial Registration: ChiCTR-IIR-17012604.

High-flow nasal cannula and in-line aerosolised bronchodilator delivery during severe exacerbation of asthma in adults: a feasibility observational study.

BACKGROUND: Asthma is a common chronic respiratory disease affecting 1-29% of the population in different countries. Exacerbations represent a change in symptoms and lung function from the patient's usual condition that requires emergency department (ED) admission. Recently, the use of a High-Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) plus an in-line vibrating mesh nebulizer (VMN) for aerosol drug delivery has been advocated in clinical practice. Thus, this pilot observational study aims to investigate the feasibility of HFNC treatment with VMN for in-line bronchodilator delivery in patients with severe asthma. METHODS: This study was conducted from May 2022 to May 2023. Subjects ≥18 years old with a previous diagnosis of asthma who were admitted to the ED during severe exacerbation were included. The primary endpoint was the change in peak expiratory flow ratio (PEFR) after 2-h of treatment with bronchodilator delivered by HFNC with in-line VMN. Additional outcomes were changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and clinical variables before treatment. RESULTS: 30 patients, mean age of 43 (SD ± 16) years, mostly female (67%) were studied. A significant change in PEFR (147 ± 31 L/m vs. 220 ± 38 L/m; p < 0.001) was observed after treatment with HFNC and in-line VMN with significant improvement in clinical variables. And no subjects required invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) during the study. CONCLUSIONS: HFNC treatment with in-line VMN for bronchodilator delivery appears feasible and safe for patients with severe asthma exacerbation. These preliminary promising results should be confirmed with appropriately large-designed studies.

Effects of increasing tidal volume and end-expiratory lung volume on induced bronchoconstriction in healthy humans.

BACKGROUND: Increasing functional residual capacity (FRC) or tidal volume (VT) reduces airway resistance and attenuates the response to bronchoconstrictor stimuli in animals and humans. What is unknown is which one of the above mechanisms is more effective in modulating airway caliber and whether their combination yields additive or synergistic effects. To address this question, we investigated the effects of increased FRC and increased VT in attenuating the bronchoconstriction induced by inhaled methacholine (MCh) in healthy humans. METHODS: Nineteen healthy volunteers were challenged with a single-dose of MCh and forced oscillation was used to measure inspiratory resistance at 5 and 19 Hz (R5 and R19), their difference (R5-19), and reactance at 5 Hz (X5) during spontaneous breathing and during imposed breathing patterns with increased FRC, or VT, or both. Importantly, in our experimental design we held the product of VT and breathing frequency (BF), i.e, minute ventilation (VE) fixed so as to better isolate the effects of changes in VT alone. RESULTS: Tripling VT from baseline FRC significantly attenuated the effects of MCh on R5, R19, R5-19 and X5. Doubling VT while halving BF had insignificant effects. Increasing FRC by either one or two VT significantly attenuated the effects of MCh on R5, R19, R5-19 and X5. Increasing both VT and FRC had additive effects on R5, R19, R5-19 and X5, but the effect of increasing FRC was more consistent than increasing VT thus suggesting larger bronchodilation. When compared at iso-volume, there were no differences among breathing patterns with the exception of when VT was three times larger than during spontaneous breathing. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that increasing FRC and VT can attenuate induced bronchoconstriction in healthy humans by additive effects that are mainly related to an increase of mean operational lung volume. We suggest that static stretching as with increasing FRC is more effective than tidal stretching at constant VE, possibly through a combination of effects on airway geometry and airway smooth muscle dynamics.

Clinical effect of qingre bawei capsules combined with budesonide in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical effect of Qingre Bawei capsules combined with budesonide in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. METHODS: The retrospective study was conducted at the Baoding No.1 Central Hospital, China, and comprised data of patients with acute exacerbation of COPD admitted between June 1, 2020, and June 30, 2022. The patients were divided into two groups based on treatment methods. The group A had been treated with Qingre Bawei capsules in combination with budesonide, while the group B had been treated with budesonide alone. Both the groups had been treated for 2 consecutive weeks. The changes in blood gas indicators, inflammation indicators, and lung function indicators were compared between two groups of patients before and 24 hours after treatment. The time for clinical symptom disappearance and adverse reactions between the two groups of patients was also noted. RESULTS: Of the 120 patients, 60(50%) were in group A; 41(68.3%) males and 19(31.7%) females, with mean age 65.28±4.36 years (range: 47-78 years) and mean course of disease 31.22±4.75 hours (range: 6-65 hours). 60(50%) patients were in group B; 43(71.7%) males and 17(28.3%) females with mean age 65.31±4.31 years (range: 48-78 years) and mean course of disease 31.29±4.71 hours (range: 8-68 hours). The disappearance time of clinical symptoms in group A was better than group B (p<0.05). The levels of blood gas indicators, inflammation indicators, and lung function indicators in both groups significantly improved (p<0.05), but the degree of improvement in group A was better than group B (p<0.05); The total effective rate of group A was better than group B (p<0.05). None of the patients in either group experienced any significant adverse reaction. CONCLUSIONS: Qingre Bawei capsules combined with budesonide had a significantly better therapeutic effect on cases of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease compared to budesonide alone.

Dynamic chest radiographic evaluation of the effects of tiotropium/olodaterol combination therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the EMBODY study protocol for an open-label, prospective, single-centre, non-controlled, comparative study.

INTRODUCTION: To date, there is limited evidence on the effects of bronchodilators on respiratory dynamics in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Dynamic chest radiography (DCR) is a novel radiographic modality that provides real-time, objective and quantifiable kinetic data, including changes in the lung area (Rs), tracheal diameter, diaphragmatic kinetics and pulmonary ventilation during respiration, at a lower radiation dose than that used by fluoroscopic or CT imaging. However, the therapeutic effect of dual bronchodilators on respiratory kinetics, such as chest wall dynamics and respiratory muscle function, has not yet been prospectively evaluated using DCR. AIM: This study aims to evaluate the effects of bronchodilator therapy on respiratory kinetics in patients with COPD using DCR. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is an open-label, prospective, single-centre, non-controlled, comparative study. A total of 35 patients with COPD, aged 40-85 years, with a forced expiratory volume in the first second of 30-80%, will be enrolled. After a 2-4 weeks washout period, patients will receive tiotropium/olodaterol therapy for 6 weeks. Treatment effects will be evaluated based on DCR findings, pulmonary function test results and patient-related outcomes obtained before and after treatment. The primary endpoint is the change in Rs after therapy. The secondary endpoints include differences in other DCR parameters (diaphragmatic kinetics, tracheal diameter change and maximum pixel value change rate), pulmonary function test results and patient-related outcomes between pre-therapy and post-therapy values. All adverse events will be reported. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Chiba University Hospital. The results of this trial will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: jRCTs032210543.

Benefits of budesonide/glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate on lung function and exacerbations of COPD: a post-hoc analysis of the KRONOS study by blood eosinophil level and exacerbation history.

BACKGROUND: Japanese guidelines recommend triple inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA)/long-acting ß2-agonist (LABA) therapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and no concurrent asthma diagnosis who experience frequent exacerbations and have blood eosinophil (EOS) count ≥ 300 cells/mm3, and in patients with COPD and asthma with continuing/worsening symptoms despite receiving dual ICS/LABA therapy. These post-hoc analyses of the KRONOS study in patients with COPD and without an asthma diagnosis, examine the effects of fixed-dose triple therapy with budesonide/glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate (BGF) versus dual therapies on lung function and exacerbations based on blood EOS count - focusing on blood EOS count 100 to < 300 cells/mm3 - as a function of exacerbation history and COPD severity. METHODS: In KRONOS, patients were randomized to receive treatments that included BGF 320/14.4/10 µg, glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate (GFF) 14.4/10 µg, or budesonide/formoterol fumarate dihydrate (BFF) 320/10 µg via metered dose inhaler (two inhalations twice-daily for 24 weeks). These post-hoc analyses assessed changes from baseline in morning pre-dose trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) over 12-24 weeks and moderate or severe COPD exacerbations rates over 24 weeks. The KRONOS study was not prospectively powered for these subgroup analyses. RESULTS: Among patients with blood EOS count 100 to < 300 cells/mm3, least squares mean treatment differences for lung function improvement favored BGF over BFF in patients without an exacerbation history in the past year and in patients with moderate and severe COPD, with observed differences ranging from 62 ml to 73 ml across populations. In this same blood EOS population, moderate or severe exacerbation rates were reduced for BGF relative to GFF by 56% in patients without an exacerbation history in the past year, by 47% in patients with moderate COPD, and by 50% in patients with severe COPD. CONCLUSIONS: These post-hoc analyses of patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD from the KRONOS study seem to indicate clinicians may want to consider a step-up to triple therapy in patients with persistent/worsening symptoms with blood EOS count > 100 cells/mm3, even if disease severity is moderate and there is no recent history of exacerbations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov registry number NCT02497001 (registration date, 13 July 2015).

Longitudinal lung function trajectories in response to azithromycin therapy for chronic lung disease in children with HIV infection: a secondary analysis of the BREATHE trial.

BACKGROUND: Chronic lung disease (CLD) is common among children with HIV (CWH) including in those taking antiretroviral therapy (ART). Azithromycin has both antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory effects and has been effective in improving lung function in a variety of lung diseases. We investigated lung function trajectories among CWH with CLD on ART enrolled in a randomized controlled trial of adjuvant azithromycin. We also investigated factors that modified the effect of azithromycin on lung function. METHODS: The study used data from a double-blinded placebo-controlled trial conducted in Malawi and Zimbabwe of 48 weeks on azithromycin (BREATHE: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02426112) among CWH aged 6 to 19 years taking ART for at least six months who had a forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) z-score <-1.0. Participants had a further follow-up period of 24 weeks after intervention cessation. FEV1, forced vital capacity (FVC) and FEV1/FVC were measured at baseline, 24, 48 and 72-weeks and z-scores values calculated. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) models were used to determine the mean effect of azithromycin on lung-function z-scores at each follow-up time point. RESULTS: Overall, 347 adolescents (51% male, median age 15 years) were randomized to azithromycin or placebo. The median duration on ART was 6.2 (interquartile range: 3.8-8.6) years and 56.2% had an HIV viral load < 1000copies/ml at baseline. At baseline, the mean FEV1 z-score was - 2.0 (0.7) with 44.7% (n = 155) having an FEV1 z-score <-2, and 10.1% had microbiological evidence of azithromycin resistance. In both trial arms, FEV1 and FVC z-scores improved by 24 weeks but appeared to decline thereafter. The adjusted overall mean difference in FEV1 z-score between the azithromycin and placebo arms was 0.004 [-0.08, 0.09] suggesting no azithromycin effect and this was similar for other lung function parameters. There was no evidence of interaction between azithromycin effect and baseline age, lung function, azithromycin resistance or HIV viral load. CONCLUSION: There was no observed azithromycin effect on lung function z-scores at any time point suggesting no therapeutic effect on lung function. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02426112. First registered on 24/04/2015.

Prevalence of Bronchodilator Responsiveness: A Comparison of Old Versus New Criteria.

BACKGROUND: In 2021, the European Respiratory Society (ERS)/American Thoracic Society (ATS) guidelines issued a new definition of bronchodilator responsiveness, which is now defined as an increase in FEV1 or FVC by ≥ 10% of the predicted FEV1 or FVC. The impact of this revised definition on bronchodilator responsiveness prevalence has been relatively understudied. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from 2,696 subjects who performed pulmonary function testing at the University of Iowa from 1997 to 2018. We compared the prevalence of bronchodilator responsiveness by using the 2005 (FEV1 or FVC increase ≥ 12% baseline value and ≥ 200 mL) and 2021 (FEV1 or FVC increase ≥ 200 mL and ≥ 12% of baseline value) ERS/ATS definitions, across several different respiratory diagnosis categories. We compared the prevalence of bronchodilator responsiveness using the 2 definitions by applying the McNemar test and assessed concordance of bronchodilator responsiveness by calculating kappa coefficients for the whole study population and within each diagnosis category. RESULTS: The prevalence of bronchodilator responsiveness increased from 9% when using the 2005 ERS/ATS definition to 16% when using the 2021 definition within the entire cohort and also within each respiratory diagnosis category. In the subjects with normal pre-bronchodilator spirometry, there was a low prevalence of bronchodilator responsiveness (3%) when using the 2005 definition, and the prevalence increased (8%) when using the 2021 definition. In the subjects with normal pre-bronchodilator spirometry and FEV1 Z score ≥ 0, 2% had bronchodilator responsivness according to the 2005 guidelines, whereas 7% had bronchodilator responsiveness according to the 2021 guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of bronchodilator responsiveness increased when using the new 2021 ERS/ATS definition compared with the 2005 definition. In the subjects with normal pre-bronchodilator spirometry, the prevalence of bronchodilator responsiveness increased when using the 2021 definition, in particular, among those with an FEV1 Z score ≥ 0, which raises concerns for overdiagnosis. Future investigations should examine the correlation of bronchodilator responsiveness with clinical outcomes in this group of subjects.

Dupilumab 200 mg was efficacious in children (6-11 years) with moderate-to-severe asthma for up to 2 years: EXCURSION open-label extension study.

BACKGROUND: The phase 3 VOYAGE (NCT02948959) and open-label extension EXCURSION (NCT03560466) studies evaluated dupilumab in children (6-11 years) with uncontrolled moderate-to-severe asthma. This post hoc analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of add-on dupilumab 200 mg every 2 weeks (q2w), the largest dose cohort in both studies, in children from VOYAGE who participated in EXCURSION. METHODS: Annualized rate of severe asthma exacerbations (AERs), change in prebronchodilator percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (ppFEV1), and treatment-emergent adverse events were assessed in children with moderate-to-severe asthma who received dupilumab 200 mg q2w in VOYAGE and EXCURSION (dupilumab/dupilumab arm) and those who received placebo in VOYAGE and dupilumab 200 mg q2w in EXCURSION (placebo/dupilumab arm). These endpoints were also assessed in children with moderate-to-severe type 2 asthma (defined as blood eosinophil count ≥150 cells/µL or FeNO ≥20 ppb at the parent study baseline [PSBL]). RESULTS: In the overall population, dupilumab reduced AER and improved prebronchodilator ppFEV1 in the dupilumab/dupilumab arm (n = 158) for up to 2 years. Children receiving placebo/dupilumab (n = 85) showed similar reductions after initiation of dupilumab 200 mg q2w in EXCURSION. Similar results were observed for children with type 2 asthma at PSBL. The safety profile was consistent with the known safety profile of dupilumab. CONCLUSION: In children (6-11 years) with uncontrolled moderate-to-severe type 2 asthma, dupilumab 200 mg reduced exacerbation rates and improved lung function for up to 2 years and showed safety consistent with the known dupilumab safety profile.

Impact of Discontinuing Both Hypertonic Saline and Dornase Alfa after Elexacaftor-Tezacaftor-Ivacaftor in Cystic Fibrosis.

Rationale: Evaluating approaches to reduce treatment burden is a research priority among people with cystic fibrosis on highly effective modulators, including elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor (ETI). Objectives: We sought to evaluate the impact of discontinuing both hypertonic saline (HS) and dornase alfa (DA) versus continuing both therapies among a subgroup of participants in the SIMPLIFY study who sequentially participated in trials evaluating the independent clinical effects of discontinuing HS and DA. Methods: SIMPLIFY participants ≥12 years old on ETI and constituting a subgroup using both HS and DA at study entry were randomized to the HS or DA trial and then randomized 1:1 to continue or discontinue the applicable therapy for 6 weeks. After completion of the first trial, eligible participants could enroll in the second trial beginning with a 2-week run-in. Study outcomes were compared across the duration of SIMPLIFY participation between a cohort remaining on both therapies during SIMPLIFY and a cohort that sequentially discontinued both as a result of trial randomizations. Multivariable regression models were used to estimate treatment differences, adjusted for time between trials, trial order, baseline age, sex at birth, and percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (ppFEV1) at study entry. Results: Forty-three participants discontinued both therapies by the end of SIMPLIFY, and 63 remained on both, with overall average ppFEV1 of 96.7% at study entry and 3.9 months as the average duration of follow-up from beginning of the first trial to completion of the second trial, including time between trials. No clinically meaningful difference in the change in ppFEV1 from baseline to completion of the second trial was observed between those who discontinued and those who remained on both therapies (difference: 0.22% off-on; 95% confidence interval = -1.60, 2.03). Changes in lung clearance index at 2.5% starting concentration, patient-reported outcomes, and safety outcomes were also comparable. Patient-reported treatment burden, as measured by a Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised subscale, significantly decreased in those who discontinued both therapies. Conclusions: SIMPLIFY participants who sequentially discontinued both HS and DA experienced no meaningful changes in clinical outcomes and reported decreased treatment burden as compared with those who remained on both therapies. These data continue to inform a new era of postmodulator care of people with cystic fibrosis.

Benzbromarone as adjuvant therapy for cystic fibrosis lung disease: a pilot clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: Cystic fibrosis (CF) affects multiple organs, the most severe consequences being observed in the lungs. Despite significant progress in developing CF transmembrane conductance regulator-specific treatments for CF lung disease, exploring alternative CF-targeted medications seems reasonable. We sought to evaluate the potential beneficial effects of oral benzbromarone as an adjuvant therapy in CF patients with reduced lung function. METHODS: This was a prospective open-label pilot study of oral benzbromarone (100 mg/day) administered once daily for 90 days. Patients were followed at a tertiary referral center in southern Brazil. Safety was assessed by the number of reported adverse events. Secondary objectives included percent predicted FEV1 (FEV1%) and pulmonary exacerbations. RESULTS: Ten patients were enrolled. Benzbromarone was found to be safe, with no serious drug-related adverse events. Eight patients completed the study; the median relative change in FEV1% tended to increase during the treatment, showing an 8% increase from baseline at the final visit. However, a nonparametric test showed that the change was not significant (p = 0.06). Of a total of ten patients, only one experienced at least one pulmonary exacerbation during the study. CONCLUSIONS: Oral benzbromarone appears to be safe, and improved FEV1% has been observed in patients with CF. Further assessment in larger trials is warranted to elucidate whether oral benzbromarone can be a potential adjuvant therapy for CF.

The Effect of Priming new Plastic Spacers with 20 Puffs Salbutamol on Bronchodilator Response in Asthmatic Children.

The static charge on the plastic body of spacers attracts drug aerosols, reducing the drug available for inhalation from plastic spacers. Some instructions exist to decrease the electric charge on plastic spacers, such as priming them with salbutamol (20 puffs) before use. This study investigates whether priming plastic spacer devices with this method can improve the bronchodilator test result. This study included children with stable mild to moderate asthma. All subjects underwent two pulmonary function tests to evaluate their bronchodilator response on separate days at 24-48 hours intervals. On each day, spirometry was performed at the baseline and 15 min after inhalation of four puffs of salbutamol (100 µg/puff) through either a primed or a new spacer. The change in forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) after inhaling salbutamol was the primary outcome measure. When the patients used a new spacer, the mean baseline FEV1 (% predicted) and FEV1/FVC (forced vital capacity) were 89.56±11.95 and 86.17±6.87, respectively. However, the mean increase in FEV1 from the baseline was 10.87±8.99 in this group. On the other hand, with the primed spacer, the respective mean baseline FEV1 and FEV1/FVC values were 89.41±12.14 and 85.49±6.76, while it increased by 12.1±11.01 after salbutamol inhalation. There were no significant differences between the techniques regarding the variation in FEV1 before and after bronchodilator use via a new spacer or primed spacer. Priming new plastic spacers with 20 puffs of salbutamol did not cause additional bronchodilation in asthmatic children, suggesting this practice is inefficient in clinics.

Effectiveness and safety of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor treatment in children aged 6-11 years with cystic fibrosis in a real-world setting.

BACKGROUND: Elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor (ETI) is a highly effective cystic fibrosis (CF) transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulating therapy for people with CF and at least one F508del variant. However, there is limited data about the safety and efficacy of this therapy in pediatric populations and in real-world settings. This study aimed at evaluating the effectiveness, tolerability, and safety of ETI in children with CF. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study including all children aged 6-11 years who initiated ETI therapy between October 2022 and March 2023 at the Pediatric CF Center of Milan (Italy). Study outcomes included changes in sweat chloride concentration, FEV1, LCI2.5, body mass index (BMI), tolerance, and safety. Mean changes in study outcomes from baseline through 24 weeks were estimated using mixed-effects regression models. RESULTS: The study included 34 children with CF (median age: 8.3 years). At Week 12, we observed an average decrease in LCI2.5 of 2.3 units (95% confidence interval [CI]: -3.1; -1.5). At Week 24, sweat chloride concentration decreased by 63 mEq/L (95% CI: -69; -58), FEV1 increased by 8.8 percentage point (95% CI: 3.7; 13.9) and BMI increased by 0.15 standard deviation scores (95% CI: 0.04; 0.25). Skin rashes appeared in 6 patients which spontaneously resolved within a few days. One month after treatment initiation, one patient experienced an elevation in liver function test results, which subsequently decreased during follow-up visits without necessitating discontinuation of therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that ETI therapy is well tolerated by children with CF and is effective in improving signs of lung function abnormalities from early childhood.

Once-daily fluticasone furoate/vilanterol vs once-daily fluticasone furoate in patients with asthma aged 5 to 17 years.

BACKGROUND: Limited data exist comparing inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) plus adjunctive therapy vs ICS alone in pediatric asthma patients. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of fluticasone furoate/vilanterol (FF/VI) vs FF in children and adolescents with asthma. METHODS: This phase 3, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study (NCT03248128) included participants aged 5 to 17 years with six months or more asthma history uncontrolled on ICS monotherapy. Participants received 4-week open-label fluticasone propionate (100 µg) twice daily before 1:1 randomization to 24-week double-blind FF (50 µg:100 µg) or FF/VI (50/25 µg:100/25 µg) once daily. Two populations with different primary endpoints were analyzed to meet United States (week 12 weighted mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1; 0-4 hours]; participants aged 5-17 years) and European (change from baseline predose morning peak expiratory flow [ΔAM PEF] averaged over weeks 1-12; participants aged 5-11 years) regulatory requirements. RESULTS: Overall, 902 participants, including 673 children aged 5 to 11 years, were randomized and treated. In participants aged 5 to 17, week 12 weighted mean FEV1 (0-4 hours) was greater with FF/VI vs FF (difference: 0.083 L; P < .001). In participants aged 5 to 11, ΔAM PEF over weeks 1 to 12 showed numerical improvement with FF/VI vs FF but was not statistically significant (difference: 3.2 L/min; P = .228). No drug-related serious adverse events or deaths were reported. CONCLUSION: FF/VI significantly improved weighted mean FEV1 (0-4 hours; participants aged 5-17 years), but not ΔAM PEF (participants aged 5-11 years) vs FF. No new safety concerns were apparent. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03248128.

Salbutamol Easyhaler provides non-inferior relief of methacholine induced bronchoconstriction in comparison to Ventoline Evohaler with spacer: A randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Salbutamol is a cornerstone for relieving acute asthma symptoms, typically administered through a pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI). Dry powder inhalers (DPIs) offer an alternative, but concerns exist whether DPIs provide an effective relief during an obstructive event. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to show non-inferiority of Salbutamol Easyhaler DPI compared to pMDI with spacer in treating methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction. Applicability of Budesonide-formoterol Easyhaler DPI as a reliever was also assessed. METHODS: This was a randomized, parallel-group trial in subjects sent to methacholine challenge (MC) test for asthma diagnostics. Participants with at least 20 % decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) were randomized to receive Salbutamol Easyhaler (2 × 200 µg), Ventoline Evohaler with spacer (4 × 100 µg) or Budesonide-formoterol Easyhaler (2 × 160/4.5 µg) as a reliever. The treatment was repeated if FEV1 did not recover to at least -10 % of baseline. RESULTS: 180 participants (69 % females, mean age 46 yrs [range 18-80], FEV1%pred 89.5 [62-142] %) completed the trial. Salbutamol Easyhaler was non-inferior to pMDI with spacer in acute relief of bronchoconstriction showing a -0.083 (95 % LCL -0.146) L FEV1 difference after the first dose and -0.032 (-0.071) L after the last dose. The differences in FEV1 between Budesonide-formoterol Easyhaler and Salbutamol pMDI with spacer were -0.163 (-0.225) L after the first and -0.092 (-0.131) L after the last dose. CONCLUSION: The study confirms non-inferiority of Salbutamol Easyhaler to Ventoline Evohaler with spacer in relieving acute bronchoconstriction, making Easyhaler a sustainable and safe reliever for MC test and supports its use during asthma attacks.