Functional differences in the mu opioid receptor SNP 118A>G are dependent on receptor splice-variant and agonist-specific recruitment of ß-arrestin.

The OPRM1 gene codes for the mu opioid receptor (MOR) and polymorphisms are associated with complex patient clinical responses. The most studied single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in OPRM1 is adenine (A) substituted by guanine (G) at position 118 (118A>G, rs1799971) leading to a substitution of asparagine (Asn) for aspartic acid (Asp) at position 40 in the N terminus of the resulting protein. To date, no structural explanation for the associated clinical responses resulting from the 118A>G polymorphism has been proposed. We utilized computational modeling paired with functional cellular assays to predict unstructured N- and C-terminal regions of MOR-1. Using molecular docking and post-docking energy minimizations with morphine, we show that the extracellular substitution of Asn at position 40 alters the cytoplasmic C-terminal conformation, while leaving the G-protein binding interface unaffected. A real-time BRET assay measuring G-protein and ß-arrestin association with MOR r generated data that tested this prediction. Consistent with this in silico prediction, we show changes in morphine-mediated ß-arrestin association with receptor variants with little change in morphine-mediated G-protein association comparing MOR-1 wild type (WT) to MOR-1118A>G. We tested the system with different opioid agonists, the OPRM1 118A>G SNP, and different MOR splice variants (MOR-1 and MOR-1O). These results are consistent with the observation that patients with the 118A>G OPRM1 allele respond more readily to fentanyl than to morphine. In conclusion, the 118A>G substitution alters receptor responses to opioids through variable C-terminal domain movements that are agonist and splice variant dependent.

Antagonism of ß-arrestins in IL-4-driven microglia reactivity via the Samd4/mTOR/OXPHOS axis in Parkinson's disease.

Interleukin-4 (IL-4)-exposed microglia acquire neuroprotective properties, but their functions and regulation in Parkinson's disease (PD) are poorly understood. In this study, we demonstrate that IL-4 enhances anti-inflammatory microglia reactivity, ameliorates the pathological features of PD, and reciprocally affects expression of ß-arrestin 1 and ß-arrestin 2 in microglia in PD mouse models. We also show that manipulation of two ß-arrestins produces contrary effects on the anti-inflammatory states and neuroprotective action of microglia induced by IL-4 in vivo and in vitro. We further find that the functional antagonism of two ß-arrestins is mediated through sequential activation of sterile alpha motif domain containing 4 (Samd4), mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), and mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS). Collectively, these data reveal opposing functions of two closely related ß-arrestins in regulating the IL-4-induced microglia reactivity via the Samd4/mTOR/OXPHOS axis in PD mouse models and provide important insights into the pathogenesis and therapeutics of PD.

Phosphorylation patterns in the AT1R C-terminal tail specify distinct downstream signaling pathways.

Different ligands stabilize specific conformations of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) that direct distinct signaling cascades mediated by heterotrimeric G proteins or ß-arrestin. These different active conformations are thought to engage distinct intracellular transducers because of differential phosphorylation patterns in the receptor C-terminal tail (the "barcode" hypothesis). Here, we identified the AT1R barcodes for the endogenous agonist AngII, which stimulates both G protein activation and ß-arrestin recruitment, and for a synthetic biased agonist that only stimulates ß-arrestin recruitment. The endogenous and ß-arrestin-biased agonists induced two different ensembles of phosphorylation sites along the C-terminal tail. The phosphorylation of eight serine and threonine residues in the proximal and middle portions of the tail was required for full ß-arrestin functionality, whereas phosphorylation of the serine and threonine residues in the distal portion of the tail had little influence on ß-arrestin function. Similarly, molecular dynamics simulations showed that the proximal and middle clusters of phosphorylated residues were critical for stable ß-arrestin-receptor interactions. These findings demonstrate that ligands that stabilize different receptor conformations induce different phosphorylation clusters in the C-terminal tail as barcodes to evoke distinct receptor-transducer engagement, receptor trafficking, and signaling.

Activation of µ receptors by SR-17018 through a distinctive mechanism.

Agonists at µ opioid receptors relieve acute pain, however, their long-term use is limited by side effects, which may involve ß-arrestin2. Agonists biased against ß-arrestin2 recruitment may be advantageous. However, the classification of bias may be compromised by assays utilising overexpressed µ receptors which overestimate efficacy for G-protein activation. There is a need for re-evaluation with restricted receptor availability to determine accurate agonist efficacies. We depleted µ receptor availability in PathHunter CHO cells using the irreversible antagonist, ß-funaltrexamine (ß-FNA), and compared efficacies and apparent potencies of twelve agonists, including several previously reported as biased, in ß-arrestin2 recruitment and cAMP assays. With full receptor availability all agonists had partial efficacy for stimulating ß-arrestin2 recruitment relative to DAMGO, while only TRV130 and buprenorphine were partial agonists as inhibitors of cAMP accumulation. Limiting receptor availability by prior exposure to ß-FNA (100 nM) revealed morphine, oxycodone, PZM21, herkinorin, U47700, tianeptine and U47931e are also partial agonists in the cAMP assay. The efficacies of all agonists, except SR-17018, correlated between ß-arrestin2 recruitment and cAMP assays, with depleted receptor availability in the latter. Furthermore, naloxone and cyprodime exhibited non-competitive antagonism of SR-17018 in the ß-arrestin2 recruitment assay. Limited antagonism by naloxone was also non-competitive in the cAMP assay, while cyprodime was competitive. Furthermore, SR-17018 only negligibly diminished ß-arrestin2 recruitment stimulated by DAMGO (1 µM), whereas fentanyl, morphine and TRV130 all exhibited the anticipated competitive inhibition. The data suggest that SR-17018 achieves bias against ß-arrestin2 recruitment through interactions with µ receptors outside the orthosteric agonist site. This article is part of the Special Issue on "Ligand Bias".

Discovery of 2-Methyl-5-(1H-pyrazol-4-yl)pyridines and Related Heterocycles as Promising M4 mAChR Positive Allosteric Modulators for the Treatment of Neurocognitive Disorders.

The M4 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) is a biological target for neurocognitive disorders. Compound 1 is an ago-PAM for the M4 mAChR. Herein, we report the design, synthesis, and evaluation of novel putative M4 mAChR PAMs based on 1. These analogs were screened and then fully characterized in two functional assays (GoB protein activation and CAMYEL activation) to quantify their allosteric and ago-PAM properties against ACh. A selection of 7 M4 PAMs were assessed for their ability to modulate ACh-mediated ß-arrestin recruitment and revealed 4 distinct clusters of M4 PAM activity: (1) analogs similar to 1 (24d), (2) analogs demonstrating only allosteric agonism (23d), (3) analogs with increased allosteric properties in CAMYEL activation (23b/23f and 24a/24b), and (4) analogs with a biased modulatory effect toward ß-arrestin recruitment (23i). These novel M4 chemical tools disclose discrete molecular determinants, allowing further interrogation of the therapeutic roles of cAMP and ß-arrestin pathways in neurocognitive disorders.

Role of the V2R-ßarrestin-Gßγ complex in promoting G protein translocation to endosomes.

Classically, G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) promote signaling at the plasma membrane through activation of heterotrimeric Gαßγ proteins, followed by the recruitment of GPCR kinases and ßarrestin (ßarr) to initiate receptor desensitization and internalization. However, studies demonstrated that some GPCRs continue to signal from internalized compartments, with distinct cellular responses. Both ßarr and Gßγ contribute to such non-canonical endosomal G protein signaling, but their specific roles and contributions remain poorly understood. Here, we demonstrate that the vasopressin V2 receptor (V2R)-ßarr complex scaffolds Gßγ at the plasma membrane through a direct interaction with ßarr, enabling its transport to endosomes. Gßγ subsequently potentiates Gαs endosomal translocation, presumably to regenerate an endosomal pool of heterotrimeric Gs. This work shines light on the mechanism underlying G protein subunits translocation from the plasma membrane to the endosomes and provides a basis for understanding the role of ßarr in mediating sustained G protein signaling.

Involvement of serotonergic receptors in depressive processes and their modulation by ß-arrestins: A review.

Over time, several studies have been conducted to demonstrate the functions of the neurotransmitter 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), better known as serotonin. This neurotransmitter is associated with the modulation of various social and physiological behaviors, and its dysregulation has consequences at the behavioral level, leading to various neurophysiological disorders. Disorders such as anxiety, depression, schizophrenia, epilepsy, sexual disorders, and eating disorders, have been closely linked to variations in 5-HT concentrations and modifications in brain structures, including the raphe nuclei (RN), prefrontal cortex, basal ganglia, hippocampus, and hypothalamus, among others. The involvement of ß-arrestin proteins has been implicated in the modulation of the serotonergic receptor response, as well as the activation of different signaling pathways related to the serotonergic system, this is particularly relevant in depressive disorders. This review will cover the implications of alterations in 5-HT receptor expression in depressive disorders in one hand and how ß-arrestin proteins modulate the response mediated by these receptors in the other hand.

Xelaglifam, a novel GPR40/FFAR1 agonist, exhibits enhanced ß-arrestin recruitment and sustained glycemic control for type 2 diabetes.

Xelaglifam, developed as a GPR40/FFAR1 agonist, induces glucose-dependent insulin secretion and reduces circulating glucose levels for Type 2 diabetes treatment. This study investigated the effects of Xelaglifam in comparison with Fasiglifam on the in vitro/in vivo anti-diabetic efficacy and selectivity, and the mechanistic basis. In vitro studies on downstream targets of Xelaglifam were performed in GPR40-expressing cells. Xelaglifam treatment exhibited dose-dependent effects, increasing inositol phosphate-1, Ca2+ mobilization, and ß-arrestin recruitment (EC50: 0.76 nM, 20 nM, 68 nM), supporting its role in Gq protein-dependent and G-protein-independent mechanisms. Despite a lack of change in the cAMP pathway, the Xelaglifam-treated group demonstrated increased insulin secretion compared to Fasiglifam in HIT-T15 ß cells under high glucose conditions. High doses of Xelaglifam (<30 mg/kg) did not induce hypoglycemia in Sprague-Dawley rats. In addition, Xelaglifam lowered glucose and increased insulin levels in diabetic rat models (GK, ZDF, OLETF). In GK rats, 1 mg/kg of Xelaglifam improved glucose tolerance (33.4 % and 15.6 % for the 1 and 5 h) after consecutive glucose challenges. Moreover, repeated dosing in ZDF and OLETF rats resulted in superior glucose tolerance (34 % and 35.1 % in ZDF and OLETF), reducing fasting hyperglycemia (18.3 % and 30 % in ZDF and OLETF) at lower doses; Xelaglifam demonstrated a longer-lasting effect with a greater effect on ß-cells including 3.8-fold enhanced insulin secretion. Co-treatment of Xelaglifam with SGLT-2 inhibitors showed additive or synergistic effects. Collectively, these results demonstrate the therapeutic efficacy and selectivity of Xelaglifam on GPR40, supportive of its potential for the treatment of Type 2 diabetes.

ß-arrestins Are Scaffolding Proteins Required for Shh-Mediated Axon Guidance.

During nervous system development, Sonic hedgehog (Shh) guides developing commissural axons toward the floor plate of the spinal cord. To guide axons, Shh binds to its receptor Boc and activates downstream effectors such as Smoothened (Smo) and Src family kinases (SFKs). SFK activation requires Smo activity and is also required for Shh-mediated axon guidance. Here we report that ß-arrestin1 and ß-arrestin2 (ß-arrestins) serve as scaffolding proteins that link Smo and SFKs in Shh-mediated axon guidance. We found that ß-arrestins are expressed in rat commissural neurons. We also found that Smo, ß-arrestins, and SFKs form a tripartite complex, with the complex formation dependent on ß-arrestins. ß-arrestin knockdown blocked the Shh-mediated increase in Src phosphorylation, demonstrating that ß-arrestins are required to activate Src kinase downstream of Shh. ß-arrestin knockdown also led to the loss of Shh-mediated attraction of rat commissural axons in axon turning assays. Expression of two different dominant-negative ß-arrestins, ß-arrestin1 V53D which blocks the internalization of Smo and ß-arrestin1 P91G-P121E which blocks its interaction with SFKs, also led to the loss of Shh-mediated attraction of commissural axons. In vivo, the expression of these dominant-negative ß-arrestins caused defects in commissural axon guidance in the spinal cord of chick embryos of mixed sexes. Thus we show that ß-arrestins are essential scaffolding proteins that connect Smo to SFKs and are required for Shh-mediated axon guidance.

Kinetic Model for the Desensitization of G Protein-Coupled Receptor.

Desensitization of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) is a general regulatory mechanism adopted by biological organisms against overstimulation of G protein signaling. Although the details of the mechanism are extensively studied, it is not easy to gain an overarching understanding of the process constituted by a multitude of molecular events with vastly differing time scales. To offer a semiquantitative yet predictive understanding of the mechanism, we formulate a kinetic model for the G protein signaling and desensitization by considering essential biochemical steps from ligand binding to receptor internalization. The internalization, followed by receptor depletion from the plasma membrane, attenuates the downstream signal. Together with the kinetic model and its full numerics of the expression derived for the dose-response relation, an approximated form of the expression clarifies the role played by the individual biochemical processes and allows us to identify four distinct regimes for the downregulation that emerge from the balance between phosphorylation, dephosphorylation, and the cellular level of ß-arrestin.

Characterization of genetic variants of GIPR reveals a contribution of ß-arrestin to metabolic phenotypes.

Incretin-based therapies are highly successful in combatting obesity and type 2 diabetes1. Yet both activation and inhibition of the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptor (GIPR) in combination with glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor (GLP-1R) activation have resulted in similar clinical outcomes, as demonstrated by the GIPR-GLP-1R co-agonist tirzepatide2 and AMG-133 (ref. 3) combining GIPR antagonism with GLP-1R agonism. This underlines the importance of a better understanding of the GIP system. Here we show the necessity of ß-arrestin recruitment for GIPR function, by combining in vitro pharmacological characterization of 47 GIPR variants with burden testing of clinical phenotypes and in vivo studies. Burden testing of variants with distinct ligand-binding capacity, Gs activation (cyclic adenosine monophosphate production) and ß-arrestin 2 recruitment and internalization shows that unlike variants solely impaired in Gs signalling, variants impaired in both Gs and ß-arrestin 2 recruitment contribute to lower adiposity-related traits. Endosomal Gs-mediated signalling of the variants shows a ß-arrestin dependency and genetic ablation of ß-arrestin 2 impairs cyclic adenosine monophosphate production and decreases GIP efficacy on glucose control in male mice. This study highlights a crucial impact of ß-arrestins in regulating GIPR signalling and overall preservation of biological activity that may facilitate new developments in therapeutic targeting of the GIPR system.

Positive allosteric modulation of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor potentiates endocannabinoid signalling and changes ERK1/2 phosphorylation kinetics.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Activation of CB1 by exogenous agonists causes adverse effects in vivo. Positive allosteric modulation may offer improved therapeutic potential and a reduced on-target adverse effect profile compared with orthosteric agonists, due to reduced desensitisation/tolerance, but this has not been directly tested. This study investigated the ability of PAMs/ago-PAMs to induce receptor regulation pathways, including desensitisation and receptor internalisation. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) assays in HEK293 cells were performed to investigate G protein dissociation, ERK1/2 phosphorylation and ß-arrestin 2 translocation, while immunocytochemistry was performed to measure internalisation of CB1 in response to the PAMs ZCZ011, GAT229 and ABD1236 alone and in combination with the orthosteric agonists AEA, 2-AG, and AMB-FUBINACA. KEY RESULTS: ZCZ011, GAT229 and ABD1236 were allosteric agonists in all pathways tested. The ago-PAM ZCZ011 induced a biphasic ERK1/2 phosphorylation time course compared to transient activation by orthosteric agonists. In combination with 2-AG but not AEA or AMB-FUBINACA, ZCZ011 and ABD1236 caused the transient peak of ERK1/2 phosphorylation to become sustained. All PAMs increased the potency and efficacy of AEA-induced signalling in all pathways tested; however, no notable potentiation of 2-AG or AMB-FUBINACA was observed. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Ago-PAMs can potentiate endocannabinoid CB1 agonism by AEA to a larger extent compared with 2-AG. However, all compounds were found to be allosteric agonists and induce activation of CB1 in the absence of endocannabinoid, including ß-arrestin 2 recruitment and internalisation. Thus, the spatiotemporal signalling of endogenous cannabinoids will not be retained in vivo.

G protein-coupled receptor endocytosis generates spatiotemporal bias in ß-arrestin signaling.

The stabilization of different active conformations of G protein-coupled receptors is thought to underlie the varying efficacies of biased and balanced agonists. Here, profiling the activation of signal transducers by angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) agonists revealed that the extent and kinetics of ß-arrestin binding exhibited substantial ligand-dependent differences, which were lost when receptor internalization was inhibited. When AT1R endocytosis was prevented, even weak partial agonists of the ß-arrestin pathway acted as full or near-full agonists, suggesting that receptor conformation did not exclusively determine ß-arrestin recruitment. The ligand-dependent variance in ß-arrestin translocation was much larger at endosomes than at the plasma membrane, showing that ligand efficacy in the ß-arrestin pathway was spatiotemporally determined. Experimental investigations and mathematical modeling demonstrated how multiple factors concurrently shaped the effects of agonists on endosomal receptor-ß-arrestin binding and thus determined the extent of functional selectivity. Ligand dissociation rate and G protein activity had particularly strong, internalization-dependent effects on the receptor-ß-arrestin interaction. We also showed that endocytosis regulated the agonist efficacies of two other receptors with sustained ß-arrestin binding: the V2 vasopressin receptor and a mutant ß2-adrenergic receptor. In the absence of endocytosis, the agonist-dependent variance in ß-arrestin2 binding was markedly diminished. Our results suggest that endocytosis determines the spatiotemporal bias in GPCR signaling and can aid in the development of more efficacious, functionally selective compounds.

Lysophosphatidic Acid Receptor 3 (LPA3): Signaling and Phosphorylation Sites.

LPA3 receptors were expressed in TREx HEK 293 cells, and their signaling and phosphorylation were studied. The agonist, lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), increased intracellular calcium and ERK phosphorylation through pertussis toxin-insensitive processes. Phorbol myristate acetate, but not LPA, desensitizes LPA3-mediated calcium signaling, the agonists, and the phorbol ester-induced LPA3 internalization. Pitstop 2 (clathrin heavy chain inhibitor) markedly reduced LPA-induced receptor internalization; in contrast, phorbol ester-induced internalization was only delayed. LPA induced rapid ß-arrestin-LPA3 receptor association. The agonist and the phorbol ester-induced marked LPA3 receptor phosphorylation, and phosphorylation sites were detected using mass spectrometry. Phosphorylated residues were detected in the intracellular loop 3 (S221, T224, S225, and S229) and in the carboxyl terminus (S321, S325, S331, T333, S335, Y337, and S343). Interestingly, phosphorylation sites are within sequences predicted to constitute ß-arrestin binding sites. These data provide insight into LPA3 receptor signaling and regulation.

ArreSTick motif controls ß-arrestin-binding stability and extends phosphorylation-dependent ß-arrestin interactions to non-receptor proteins.

The binding and function of ß-arrestins are regulated by specific phosphorylation motifs present in G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). However, the exact arrangement of phosphorylated amino acids responsible for establishing a stable interaction remains unclear. We employ a 1D sequence convolution model trained on GPCRs with established ß-arrestin-binding properties. With this approach, amino acid motifs characteristic of GPCRs that form stable interactions with ß-arrestins can be identified, a pattern that we name "arreSTick." Intriguingly, the arreSTick pattern is also present in numerous non-receptor proteins. Using proximity biotinylation assay and mass spectrometry analysis, we demonstrate that the arreSTick motif controls the interaction between many non-receptor proteins and ß-arrestin2. The HIV-1 Tat-specific factor 1 (HTSF1 or HTATSF1), a nuclear transcription factor, contains the arreSTick pattern, and its subcellular localization is influenced by ß-arrestin2. Our findings unveil a broader role for ß-arrestins in phosphorylation-dependent interactions, extending beyond GPCRs to encompass non-receptor proteins as well.

Therapeutic potentials of nonpeptidic V2R agonists for partial cNDI-causing V2R mutants.

Loss-of-function mutations in the type 2 vasopressin receptor (V2R) are a major cause of congenital nephrogenic diabetes insipidus (cNDI). In the context of partial cNDI, the response to desmopressin (dDAVP) is partially, but not entirely, diminished. For those with the partial cNDI, restoration of V2R function would offer a prospective therapeutic approach. In this study, we revealed that OPC-51803 (OPC5) and its structurally related V2R agonists could functionally restore V2R mutants causing partial cNDI by inducing prolonged signal activation. The OPC5-related agonists exhibited functional selectivity by inducing signaling through the Gs-cAMP pathway while not recruiting ß-arrestin1/2. We found that six cNDI-related V2R partial mutants (V882.53M, Y1283.41S, L1614.47P, T2736.37M, S3298.47R and S3338.51del) displayed varying degrees of plasma membrane expression levels and exhibited moderately impaired signaling function. Several OPC5-related agonists induced higher cAMP responses than AVP at V2R mutants after prolonged agonist stimulation, suggesting their potential effectiveness in compensating impaired V2R-mediated function. Furthermore, docking analysis revealed that the differential interaction of agonists with L3127.40 caused altered coordination of TM7, potentially contributing to the functional selectivity of signaling. These findings suggest that nonpeptide V2R agonists could hold promise as potential drug candidates for addressing partial cNDI.

Adrenoceptor Desensitization: Current Understanding of Mechanisms.

G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) transduce a wide range of extracellular signals. They are key players in the majority of biologic functions including vision, olfaction, chemotaxis, and immunity. However, as essential as most of them are to body function and homeostasis, overactivation of GPCRs has been implicated in many pathologic diseases such as cancer, asthma, and heart failure (HF). Therefore, an important feature of G protein signaling systems is the ability to control GPCR responsiveness, and one key process to control overstimulation involves initiating receptor desensitization. A number of steps are appreciated in the desensitization process, including cell surface receptor phosphorylation, internalization, and downregulation. Rapid or short-term desensitization occurs within minutes and involves receptor phosphorylation via the action of intracellular protein kinases, the binding of ß-arrestins, and the consequent uncoupling of GPCRs from their cognate heterotrimeric G proteins. On the other hand, long-term desensitization occurs over hours to days and involves receptor downregulation or a decrease in cell surface receptor protein level. Of the proteins involved in this biologic phenomenon, ß-arrestins play a particularly significant role in both short- and long-term desensitization mechanisms. In addition, ß-arrestins are involved in the phenomenon of biased agonism, where the biased ligand preferentially activates one of several downstream signaling pathways, leading to altered cellular responses. In this context, this review discusses the different patterns of desensitization of the α 1-, α 2- and the ß adrenoceptors and highlights the role of ß-arrestins in regulating physiologic responsiveness through desensitization and biased agonism. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: A sophisticated network of proteins orchestrates the molecular regulation of GPCR activity. Adrenoceptors are GPCRs that play vast roles in many physiological processes. Without tightly controlled desensitization of these receptors, homeostatic imbalance may ensue, thus precipitating various diseases. Here, we critically appraise the mechanisms implicated in adrenoceptor desensitization. A better understanding of these mechanisms helps identify new druggable targets within the GPCR desensitization machinery and opens exciting therapeutic fronts in the treatment of several pathologies.

Generation of Comprehensive GPCR-Transducer-Deficient Cell Lines to Dissect the Complexity of GPCR Signaling.

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) compose the largest family of transmembrane receptors and are targets of approximately one-third of Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs owing to their involvement in almost all physiologic processes. GPCR signaling occurs through the activation of heterotrimeric G-protein complexes and ß-arrestins, both of which serve as transducers, resulting in distinct cellular responses. Despite seeming simple at first glance, accumulating evidence indicates that activation of either transducer is not a straightforward process as a stimulation of a single molecule has the potential to activate multiple signaling branches. The complexity of GPCR signaling arises from the aspects of G-protein-coupling selectivity, biased signaling, interpathway crosstalk, and variable molecular modifications generating these diverse signaling patterns. Numerous questions relative to these aspects of signaling remained unanswered until the recent development of CRISPR genome-editing technology. Such genome editing technology presents opportunities to chronically eliminate the expression of G-protein subunits, ß-arrestins, G-protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs), and many other signaling nodes in the GPCR pathways at one's convenience. Here, we review the practicality of using CRISPR-derived knockout (KO) cells in the experimental contexts of unraveling the molecular details of GPCR signaling mechanisms. To mention a few, KO cells have revealed the contribution of ß-arrestins in ERK activation, Gα protein selectivity, GRK-based regulation of GPCRs, and many more, hence validating its broad applicability in GPCR studies. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This review emphasizes the practical application of G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) transducer knockout (KO) cells in dissecting the intricate regulatory mechanisms of the GPCR signaling network. Currently available cell lines, along with accumulating KO cell lines in diverse cell types, offer valuable resources for systematically elucidating GPCR signaling regulation. Given the association of GPCR signaling with numerous diseases, uncovering the system-based signaling map is crucial for advancing the development of novel drugs targeting specific diseases.

Beneath the surface: endosomal GPCR signaling.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) located at the cell surface bind extracellular ligands and convey intracellular signals via activation of heterotrimeric G proteins. Traditionally, G protein signaling was viewed to occur exclusively at this subcellular region followed by rapid desensitization facilitated by ß-arrestin (ßarr)-mediated G protein uncoupling and receptor internalization. However, emerging evidence over the past 15 years suggests that these ßarr-mediated events do not necessarily terminate receptor signaling and that some GPCRs continue to activate G proteins after having been internalized into endosomes. Here, we review the recently elucidated mechanistic basis underlying endosomal GPCR signaling and discuss physiological implications and pharmacological targeting of this newly appreciated signaling mode.