Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of extending prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting for cancer surgical patients in the PACU: a before and after retrospective study
Motamed, Cyrus; Weil, Grégoire; Bourgain, Jean Louis.
Afiliación
  • Motamed, Cyrus; Gustave Roussy Institute. Department of Anesthesia. Villejuif. FR
  • Weil, Grégoire; Gustave Roussy Institute. Department of Anesthesia. Villejuif. FR
  • Bourgain, Jean Louis; Gustave Roussy Institute. Department of Anesthesia. Villejuif. FR
Braz. J. Anesth. (Impr.) ; 72(6): 762-767, Nov.-Dec. 2022. tab, graf
Article en En | LILACS | ID: biblio-1420631
Biblioteca responsable: BR891.2
ABSTRACT
Abstract Backgrounds Procedures for Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) prevention are mostly based on identification of the risk factors before administering antiemetic drugs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of the extended use of antiemetic on the PONV in the Postanesthetic Care Unit (PACU). Methods Two separate 4-year periods (2007-2010, P1, and (2015-2018, P2) were evaluated. During P1, the protocol consisted of dexamethasone and droperidol for patients with a locally adapted high PONV score, followed by ondansetron for rescue in the PACU. For Period 2, dexamethasone (8 mg) and ondansetron (4 mg) were administered in patients under general or regional anesthesia, or sedation longer than 30 minutes, while droperidol (1.25 mg) in rescue was injected in cases of PONV in the PACU. An Anesthesia Information Management System was used to evaluate the intensity score of PONV (1 to 5), putative compliance, sedation, and perioperative opioid consumption upon arrival in the PACU. Results A total of 27,602 patients were assessed in P1 and 36,100 in P2. The administration of dexamethasone and ondansetron increased several fold (p < 0.0001). The high PONV scores were more improved in P2 than in P1, with scores (3+4+5) for P1 vs. P2, p < 0.0001. Overall, 99.7% of the patients in P2 were asymptomatic at discharge. Morphine consumption decreased from 6.9±1.5 mg in P1 to 3.5 ± 1.5 mg in P2 (p < 0.0001). Discussion The extension of pharmacological prevention of PONV was associated with a decrease in the intensity of severe PONV. However, uncertainty regarding confounding factors should not be ignored. IRB nº 92012/33465
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: LILACS Contexto en salud: 1_ASSA2030 / 2_ODS3 Problema de salud: 1_doencas_nao_transmissiveis / 2_muertes_prematuras_enfermedades_notrasmisibles Asunto principal: Antieméticos / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Braz. J. Anesth. (Impr.) Asunto de la revista: ANESTESIOLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Francia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: LILACS Contexto en salud: 1_ASSA2030 / 2_ODS3 Problema de salud: 1_doencas_nao_transmissiveis / 2_muertes_prematuras_enfermedades_notrasmisibles Asunto principal: Antieméticos / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Braz. J. Anesth. (Impr.) Asunto de la revista: ANESTESIOLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Francia
...