Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
T2-weighted endorectal magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer after external beam radiation therapy
Westphalen, Antonio C; Kurhanewicz, John; Cunha, Rui M. G; Hsu, I-Chow; Kornak, John; Zhao, Shoujun; Coakley, Fergus V.
Afiliación
  • Westphalen, Antonio C; University of California. Department of Radiology. Abdominal Imaging Section. San Francisco. US
  • Kurhanewicz, John; University of California. Department of Radiology. Abdominal Imaging Section. San Francisco. US
  • Cunha, Rui M. G; University of California. Department of Radiology. Abdominal Imaging Section. San Francisco. US
  • Hsu, I-Chow; University of California. Department of Radiology. Abdominal Imaging Section. San Francisco. US
  • Kornak, John; University of California. Department of Radiology. Abdominal Imaging Section. San Francisco. US
  • Zhao, Shoujun; University of California. Department of Radiology. Abdominal Imaging Section. San Francisco. US
  • Coakley, Fergus V; University of California. Department of Radiology. Abdominal Imaging Section. San Francisco. US
Int. braz. j. urol ; 35(2): 171-182, Mar.-Apr. 2009. ilus, tab
Article en En | LILACS | ID: lil-516959
Biblioteca responsable: BR1.1
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To retrospectively determine the accuracy of T2-weighted endorectal MR imaging in the detection of prostate cancer after external beam radiation therapy and to investigate the relationship between imaging accuracy and time since therapy. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

Institutional review board approval was obtained and the study was HIPPA compliant. We identified 59 patients who underwent 1.5 Tesla endorectal MR imaging of the prostate between 1999 and 2006 after definitive external beam radiation therapy for biopsy-proven prostate cancer. Two readers recorded the presence or absence of tumor on T2-weighted images. Logistic regression and Fisher’s exact tests for 2x2 tables were used to determine the accuracy of imaging and investigate if accuracy differed between those imaged within 3 years of therapy (n = 25) and those imaged more than 3 years after therapy (n = 34). Transrectal biopsy was used as the standard of reference for the presence or absence of recurrent cancer.

RESULTS:

Thirty-four of 59 patients (58 percent) had recurrent prostate cancer detected on biopsy. The overall accuracy of T2-weighted MR imaging in the detection cancer after external beam radiation therapy was 63 percent (37/59) for reader 1 and 71 percent for reader 2 (42/59). For both readers, logistic regression showed no difference in accuracy between those imaged within 3 years of therapy and those imaged more than 3 years after therapy (p = 0.86 for reader 1 and 0.44 for reader 2).

CONCLUSION:

T2-weighted endorectal MR imaging has low accuracy in the detection of prostate cancer after external beam radiation therapy, irrespective of the time since therapy.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave
Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: LILACS Asunto principal: Próstata / Neoplasias de la Próstata / Recto / Imagen por Resonancia Magnética / Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Int. braz. j. urol Asunto de la revista: UROLOGIA Año: 2009 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos
Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: LILACS Asunto principal: Próstata / Neoplasias de la Próstata / Recto / Imagen por Resonancia Magnética / Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Int. braz. j. urol Asunto de la revista: UROLOGIA Año: 2009 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos
...