Coronary artery stenting in the aged.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The study compared the safety and efficacy of coronary artery stenting in aged and nonaged patients and identified predictors of adverse clinical outcomes. BACKGROUND: Limited data are available on the outcomes of stenting in the aged (> or = 80 years) compared to nonaged patients. METHODS: The study was a pooled analysis of 6,186 patients who underwent coronary artery stenting in six recent multicenter trials. A clinical events committee adjudicated clinical end points, and quantitative angiography was performed by an independent core laboratory. RESULTS: There were 301 (4.9%) aged patients (> or = 80 years). Compared to nonaged patients, aged patients had a higher prevalence of multivessel disease (16.5% vs. 9.6%, p = 0.001), unstable angina (50.8% vs. 42.1%, p = 0.003), moderate to severe target lesion calcification (30.4% vs. 15.3%, p = 0.001) and smaller reference vessel diameter (2.90 mm vs. 2.98 mm, p = 0.004). Procedural success rate (97.4% vs. 98.5%, p = 0.14) was similar in the two groups. In-hospital mortality (1.33% vs. 0.10%, p = 0.001), bleeding complications (4.98% vs. 1.00%, p < 0.001) and one-year mortality (5.65% vs. 1.41%, p < 0.001) were significantly higher for the aged patients. Clinical restenosis was similar for the two groups (11.19% vs. 11.93%, p = 0.78). Advanced age, diabetes, prior myocardial infarction and presence of three-vessel disease were independent predictors of long-term mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary artery stenting can be performed safely in patients > or = 80 years of age, with excellent acute results and a low rate of clinical restenosis, albeit with higher incidences of in-hospital and long-term mortality, and vascular and bleeding complications compared to nonaged patients.