Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of etanercept and methotrexate, alone and combined, in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: two-year clinical and radiographic results from the TEMPO study, a double-blind, randomized trial.
van der Heijde, Désirée; Klareskog, Lars; Rodriguez-Valverde, Vicente; Codreanu, Catalin; Bolosiu, Horatiu; Melo-Gomes, Jose; Tornero-Molina, Jesus; Wajdula, Joseph; Pedersen, Ronald; Fatenejad, Saeed.
Afiliación
  • van der Heijde D; Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital, Maastricht, The Netherlands. dhe@sint.azm.nl
Arthritis Rheum ; 54(4): 1063-74, 2006 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16572441
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the efficacy, including radiographic changes, and safety of etanercept and methotrexate (MTX), used in combination and alone, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in whom previous treatment with a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug other than MTX had failed.

METHODS:

Patients with RA were treated with etanercept (25 mg subcutaneously twice weekly), oral MTX (up to 20 mg weekly), or combination therapy with etanercept plus MTX through a second year, in a double-blinded manner. Clinical response was assessed using American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria and the Disease Activity Score (DAS), in a modified intent-to-treat analysis with the last observation carried forward (LOCF) and in a population of completers. Radiographs of the hands, wrists, and forefeet were scored for erosions and joint space narrowing at annual intervals.

RESULTS:

A total of 503 of 686 patients continued into year 2 of the study. During the 2 years, significantly fewer patients receiving combination therapy withdrew from the study (29% of the combination therapy group, 39% of the etanercept group, and 48% of the MTX group). Both the LOCF and the completer analyses yielded similar results. The ACR 20% improvement (ACR20), ACR50, and ACR70 responses and the remission rates (based on a DAS of <1.6) were significantly higher with combination therapy than with either monotherapy (P<0.01). Similarly, improvement in disability (based on the Health Assessment Questionnaire) was greater with combination therapy (P<0.01). The combination therapy group showed significantly less radiographic progression than did either group receiving monotherapy (P<0.05); moreover, radiographic progression was significantly lower in the etanercept group compared with the MTX group (P<0.05). For the second consecutive year, overall disease progression in the combination therapy group was negative, with the 95% confidence interval less than zero. Adverse events were similar in the 3 treatment groups.

CONCLUSION:

Etanercept in combination with MTX reduced disease activity, slowed radiographic progression, and improved function more effectively than did either monotherapy over a 2-year period. No increase in toxicity was associated with combination treatment with etanercept plus MTX.
Asunto(s)
Buscar en Google
Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Artritis Reumatoide / Inmunoglobulina G / Metotrexato / Receptores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral / Antirreumáticos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Arthritis Rheum Año: 2006 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos
Buscar en Google
Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Artritis Reumatoide / Inmunoglobulina G / Metotrexato / Receptores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral / Antirreumáticos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Arthritis Rheum Año: 2006 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos
...