Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A comparison of the oropharyngeal leak pressure between the reusable Classic laryngeal mask airway and the single-use Soft Seal laryngeal mask airway.
Hanning, S J; McCulloch, T J; Orr, B; Anderson, S P.
Afiliación
  • Hanning SJ; Department of Anaesthetics, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Anaesth Intensive Care ; 34(2): 237-9, 2006 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16617647
ABSTRACT
We tested the oropharyngeal leak pressure with the reusable laryngeal mask airway and the single-use Soft Seal laryngeal mask airway. These two types of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) have a similar design but the reusable LMA cuff is made from silicone whereas the Soft Seal LMA cuff is polyvinylchloride. Thirty-five healthy subjects were anaesthetized and paralyzed and the two types of Soft Seal LMA were compared in a blinded randomized cross-over trial. The oropharyngeal leak pressure was significantly higher with the Soft Seal than the reuable (21 +/- 7.6 and 16 +/- 6.7 cm H2O respectively, P = 0.002). However, in four subjects the oropharyngeal leak pressure was higher with the reusable by > 4 cm H2O. We concluded that the reusable LMA may provide a better seal in some individuals but that, on average, the Soft Seal provides a higher oropharyngeal leak pressure than the reusable LMA.
Asunto(s)
Buscar en Google
Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Orofaringe / Máscaras Laríngeas Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Anaesth Intensive Care Año: 2006 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia
Buscar en Google
Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Orofaringe / Máscaras Laríngeas Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Anaesth Intensive Care Año: 2006 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia
...