Comparison of objective diagnostic tests in glaucoma: Heidelberg retinal tomography and multifocal visual evoked potentials.

PURPOSE: To compare sensitivity and specificity of functional and structural changes in glaucoma using two objective tests: the multifocal visual evoked potential (m-VEP) and Heidelberg retinal tomography II (HRT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: 41 glaucoma patients and 25 normal individuals participated in the study. One eye per individual was included in the study. Individuals were evaluated with Humphrey visual field (HVF) perimetry, m-VEP, and HRT. Moorfield regression analysis findings of HRT were compared with presence of scotoma on m-VEP. Linear regression analysis of quantitative variables, such as HVF mean deviation (MD), m-VEP discriminant score (Accumap Severity Index) and, global HRT parameters was also performed. RESULTS: m-VEP sensitivity and specificity were 93% and 96% respectively. HRT sensitivity and specificity were 79% and 92% respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) for m-VEP was 0.96 and for HRT varied from 0.79 to 0.86 depending on the parameters used. Linear correlation between MD and Accumap Severity Index score was -77%, while that between HRT global parameters, Accumap Severity Index and MD were at best around 50%. Topographic comparison of the presence of scotoma on HVF and m-VEP in different areas of the visual field showed good agreement. Comparison of optic nerve head structural abnormality with corresponding areas of field defects on HVF and m-VEP showed poor to moderate agreement. CONCLUSION: The objective test of optic nerve function (m-VEP) and structure (HRT) can detect glaucomatous damage, with limited correlation. The 2 functional tests, HVF and m-VEP correlate better with each other than with HRT. It remains important to look for both functional and structural changes in order to detect all glaucoma cases.