Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cost-effectiveness of defibrillator therapy or amiodarone in chronic stable heart failure: results from the Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial (SCD-HeFT).
Mark, Daniel B; Nelson, Charlotte L; Anstrom, Kevin J; Al-Khatib, Sana M; Tsiatis, Anastasios A; Cowper, Patricia A; Clapp-Channing, Nancy E; Davidson-Ray, Linda; Poole, Jeanne E; Johnson, George; Anderson, Jill; Lee, Kerry L; Bardy, Gust H.
Afiliación
  • Mark DB; Outcomes Research Group, Duke Clinical Research Institute, PO Box 17969, Durham, NC 27715, USA. daniel.mark@duke.edu
Circulation ; 114(2): 135-42, 2006 Jul 11.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16818817
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In the Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial (SCD-HeFT), implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy significantly reduced all-cause mortality rates compared with medical therapy alone in patients with stable, moderately symptomatic heart failure, whereas amiodarone had no benefit on mortality rates. We examined long-term economic implications of these results. METHODS AND

RESULTS:

Medical costs were estimated by using hospital billing data and the Medicare Fee Schedule. Our base case cost-effectiveness analysis used empirical clinical and cost data to estimate the lifetime incremental cost of saving an extra life-year with ICD therapy relative to medical therapy alone. At 5 years, the amiodarone arm had a survival rate equivalent to that of the placebo arm and higher costs than the placebo arm. For ICD relative to medical therapy alone, the base case lifetime cost-effectiveness and cost-utility ratios (discounted at 3%) were dollar 38,389 per life-year saved (LYS) and dollar 41,530 per quality-adjusted LYS, respectively. A cost-effectiveness ratio < dollar 100,000 was obtained in 99% of 1000 bootstrap repetitions. The cost-effectiveness ratio was sensitive to the amount of extrapolation beyond the empirical 5-year trial data dollar 127,503 per LYS at 5 years, dollar 88,657 per LYS at 8 years, and dollar 58,510 per LYS at 12 years. Because of a significant interaction between ICD treatment and New York Heart Association class, the cost-effectiveness ratio was dollar 29,872 per LYS for class II, whereas there was incremental cost but no incremental benefit in class III.

CONCLUSIONS:

Prophylactic use of single-lead, shock-only ICD therapy is economically attractive in patients with stable, moderately symptomatic heart failure with an ejection fraction < or = 35%, particularly those in NYHA class II, as long as the benefits of ICD therapy observed in the SCD-HeFT persist for at least 8 years.
Asunto(s)
Buscar en Google
Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Contexto en salud: 1_ASSA2030 / 6_ODS3_enfermedades_notrasmisibles Problema de salud: 1_financiamento_saude / 6_cardiovascular_diseases / 6_other_circulatory_diseases Asunto principal: Muerte Súbita Cardíaca / Desfibriladores Implantables / Insuficiencia Cardíaca Tipo de estudio: Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Adult / Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Circulation Año: 2006 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos
Buscar en Google
Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Contexto en salud: 1_ASSA2030 / 6_ODS3_enfermedades_notrasmisibles Problema de salud: 1_financiamento_saude / 6_cardiovascular_diseases / 6_other_circulatory_diseases Asunto principal: Muerte Súbita Cardíaca / Desfibriladores Implantables / Insuficiencia Cardíaca Tipo de estudio: Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Adult / Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Circulation Año: 2006 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos
...