Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Socioeconomic determinants for compliance to colorectal cancer screening. A multilevel analysis.
Pornet, C; Dejardin, O; Morlais, F; Bouvier, V; Launoy, G.
Afiliación
  • Pornet C; 'Cancers & Populations', ERI 3 INSERM, CHU Caen, Faculty of Medicine, Avenue Côte de Nacre 14032 Caen Cedex, France.
J Epidemiol Community Health ; 64(4): 318-24, 2010 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19740776
BACKGROUND: Compliance in cancer screening among socially disadvantaged persons is known to be lower than among more socially advantaged persons. However, most of the studies regarding compliance proceed via a questionnaire and are thus limited by self-reported measures of participation and by participation bias. This study aimed at investigating the influence of socioeconomic characteristics on compliance to an organised colorectal cancer screening programme on an unbiased sample based on data from the entire target population within a French geographical department, Calvados (n=180 045). METHODS: Individual data of participation and aggregate socioeconomic data, from the structure responsible for organising screening and the French census, respectively, were analysed simultaneously by a multilevel model. RESULTS: Uptake was significantly higher in women than in men (OR=1.33; 95% CI 1.21 to 1.45), and significantly lower in the youngest (50-59 years) and in the oldest (70-74 years) persons, compared with intermediate ages (60-69 years), with OR=0.70 (95% CI 0.63 to 0.77) and OR=0.82 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.93), respectively. Uptake fell with increasing level of deprivation. There was a significant difference of uptake probability between the least deprived and the most deprived areas (OR=0.68; 95% CI 0.59 to 0.79). No significant influence of the general practitioners density was found. CONCLUSION: Multilevel analysis allowed to detect areas of weak uptake linked to areas of strong deprivation. These results suggest that targeting populations with a risk of low compliance, as identified both socially and geographically in our study, could be adopted to minimise inequalities in screening.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Contexto en salud: 2_ODS3 Problema de salud: 2_muertes_prematuras_enfermedades_notrasmisibles Asunto principal: Factores Socioeconómicos / Neoplasias Colorrectales / Tamizaje Masivo / Cooperación del Paciente Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Epidemiol Community Health Año: 2010 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Francia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Contexto en salud: 2_ODS3 Problema de salud: 2_muertes_prematuras_enfermedades_notrasmisibles Asunto principal: Factores Socioeconómicos / Neoplasias Colorrectales / Tamizaje Masivo / Cooperación del Paciente Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Epidemiol Community Health Año: 2010 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Francia
...