Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A survey of expert follow-up practices after successful endoscopic eradication therapy for Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal adenocarcinoma.
Bedi, Aarti O; Kwon, Richard S; Rubenstein, Joel H; Piraka, Cyrus R; Elta, Grace H; Scheiman, James M; Elmunzer, B Joseph.
Afiliación
  • Bedi AO; Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 78(5): 696-701, 2013 Nov.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23711553
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Despite the increasing number of patients undergoing endoscopic therapy for Barrett's esophagus (BE) with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or intramucosal cancer (IMC), there are few data to guide clinical decision making and research initiatives in the area of posttreatment follow-up.

OBJECTIVES:

We aimed to define expert practice patterns regarding follow-up after endoscopic treatment of BE with HGD and IMC.

DESIGN:

Electronic survey.

SUBJECTS:

Forty-eight endoscopists in the United States with expertise in BE endotherapy based on high-impact publications and national reputation. INTERVENTION A 21-item Web-based survey inquiring about post-BE endotherapy follow-up practices.

RESULTS:

Of 48 expert endoscopists, 42 completed the survey. After successful treatment of BE with HGD or IMC, all experts perform surveillance upper endoscopy, most commonly at 3-month intervals in the first posttreatment year, every 6 months during the second year, and annually thereafter. None of the experts perform surveillance EUS after treatment of HGD, and only 19% perform EUS after treatment of IMC. After cancer eradication, only 36% of experts refer patients for CT, and 24% refer patients for positron emission tomography. Thirty-eight percent of experts refer patients for a surgical opinion when IMC extends into the muscularis mucosa; 100% refer when IMC extends into submucosa.

LIMITATIONS:

Not a consensus document; only U.S. experts included.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study reports the follow-up practices of expert endoscopists after successful endotherapy for BE with HGD and IMC. Additional research is necessary to establish optimal surveillance intervals, the role of follow-up EUS, CT, and positron emission tomography, as well as the surgical implications of low-risk IMC extending into the muscularis mucosa.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Contexto en salud: 11_ODS3_cobertura_universal Problema de salud: 11_delivery_arrangements Asunto principal: Esófago de Barrett / Neoplasias Esofágicas / Adenocarcinoma / Cuidados Posteriores / Gastroenterología / Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Gastrointest Endosc Año: 2013 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Contexto en salud: 11_ODS3_cobertura_universal Problema de salud: 11_delivery_arrangements Asunto principal: Esófago de Barrett / Neoplasias Esofágicas / Adenocarcinoma / Cuidados Posteriores / Gastroenterología / Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Gastrointest Endosc Año: 2013 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos
...