Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Independent data monitoring committees: preparing a path for the future.
Hess, Connie N; Roe, Matthew T; Gibson, C Michael; Temple, Robert J; Pencina, Michael J; Zarin, Deborah A; Anstrom, Kevin J; Alexander, John H; Sherman, Rachel E; Fiedorek, Fred T; Mahaffey, Kenneth W; Lee, Kerry L; Chow, Shein-Chung; Armstrong, Paul W; Califf, Robert M.
Afiliación
  • Hess CN; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC.
  • Roe MT; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC. Electronic address: matthew.roe@duke.edu.
  • Gibson CM; PERFUSE Study Group, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
  • Temple RJ; US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD.
  • Pencina MJ; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC.
  • Zarin DA; National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
  • Anstrom KJ; PERFUSE Study Group, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
  • Alexander JH; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC.
  • Sherman RE; US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD.
  • Fiedorek FT; Bristol-Myers Squibb, New York, NY.
  • Mahaffey KW; Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
  • Lee KL; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC.
  • Chow SC; Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
  • Armstrong PW; University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Califf RM; Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
Am Heart J ; 168(2): 135-41.e1, 2014 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25066551
ABSTRACT
Independent data monitoring committees (IDMCs) were introduced to monitor patient safety and study conduct in randomized clinical trials (RCTs), but certain challenges regarding the utilization of IDMCs have developed. First, the roles and responsibilities of IDMCs are expanding, perhaps due to increasing trial complexity and heterogeneity regarding medical, ethical, legal, regulatory, and financial issues. Second, no standard for IDMC operating procedures exists, and there is uncertainty about who should determine standards and whether standards should vary with trial size and design. Third, considerable variability in communication pathways exist across IDMC interfaces with regulatory agencies, academic coordinating centers, and sponsors. Finally, there has been a substantial increase in the number of RCTs using IDMCs, yet there is no set of qualifications to help guide the training and development of the next generation of IDMC members. Recently, an expert panel of representatives from government, industry, and academia assembled at the Duke Clinical Research Institute to address these challenges and to develop recommendations for the future utilization of IDMCs in RCTs.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline Aspecto: Ethics Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Am Heart J Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Nueva Caledonia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline Aspecto: Ethics Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Am Heart J Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Nueva Caledonia
...