Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of the selective use of abdomino-pelvic drains at laparoscopic myomectomy: in enhanced recovery, do drains delay discharge home?
Hurrell, Alice; Oliver, Reeba; Agarwal, Nilesh; Rouabhi, Schahrazed; Odejinmi, Funlayo.
Afiliación
  • Hurrell A; Department of Gynaecology, Whipps Cross University Hospital, Barts Health Trust, London E11 1NR, UK.
  • Oliver R; Department of Gynaecology, Whipps Cross University Hospital, Barts Health Trust, London E11 1NR, UK.
  • Agarwal N; Department of Gynaecology, Northwick Park Hospital, London HA1 3UJ, UK.
  • Rouabhi S; Department of Gynaecology, Whipps Cross University Hospital, Barts Health Trust, London E11 1NR, UK.
  • Odejinmi F; Department of Gynaecology, Whipps Cross University Hospital, Barts Health Trust, London E11 1NR, UK. Electronic address: funlayo.odejinmi@bartsandthelondon.nhs.uk.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 185: 36-40, 2015 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25522116
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To assess whether the use of abdominal drains at laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) influences length of hospital stay. The primary outcome was to determine whether the use of intra-abdominal drains after LM was associated with prolonged hospital stay after surgery. Secondary outcomes were to identify factors that influence the use of abdomino-pelvic drains during LM. STUDY

DESIGN:

Retrospective cohort study of 217 consecutive single surgeon LMs in a London university teaching hospital. Abdominal drains were used selectively after LM. Of the 217 patients, 123 (57%) had a drain left in situ at the end of the operation.

RESULTS:

The two cohorts of patients were not significantly different in their demographics. The use of a drain was significantly associated with an increased number of fibroids (4.6±3.8 vs. 2.8±2.1, p<0.0001), increased weight of fibroids (277±211 g vs. 133±153 g, p<0.0001), increased surgical time (133±40 min vs. 90±35 min, p<0.0001) and increased estimated blood loss (406±265 ml vs. 199±98 ml, p<0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference in length of hospital stay (mean duration of admission 2.1 days±0.98 with drain, vs. 2.1 days±0.97 without a drain, p=0.98).

CONCLUSION:

We conclude that although the use of a drain may be associated with a more complex operation, this does not delay the patient's discharge.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Drenaje / Miomectomía Uterina / Tiempo de Internación Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Drenaje / Miomectomía Uterina / Tiempo de Internación Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido
...