No Superiority of High-Flexion vs Standard Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Update Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
J Arthroplasty
; 30(6): 980-6, 2015 Jun.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-25686782
ABSTRACT
This meta-analysis was performed using a Cochrane systematic review approach to examine published data with an aim to clarify whether standard or high flexion prostheses increase the range of knee motion and clinical outcomes. 1778 patients from 17 randomized controlled trials were identified. No significant differences in the range of motion, weight-bearing flexion and hip functions scores were found between treatment groups. We also found no significant differences in complications with regard to revision, component loosening, deep infection, anterior knee pain, stiffness, post-operative bone fracture and post-operative patella clunk syndrome, but the high flexion prostheses group had a higher incidence of deep venous thrombosis. The results do not support the proposition that high flexion knee prostheses provide substantial clinical advantages over standard knee prostheses.
Palabras clave
Texto completo:
1
Colección:
01-internacional
Base de datos:
MEDLINE
Contexto en salud:
1_ASSA2030
/
2_ODS3
Problema de salud:
1_doencas_nao_transmissiveis
/
2_muertes_prematuras_enfermedades_notrasmisibles
Asunto principal:
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla
/
Prótesis de la Rodilla
Tipo de estudio:
Clinical_trials
/
Incidence_studies
/
Prognostic_studies
/
Systematic_reviews
Límite:
Humans
Idioma:
En
Revista:
J Arthroplasty
Asunto de la revista:
ORTOPEDIA
Año:
2015
Tipo del documento:
Article