Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
NIPT-based screening for Down syndrome and beyond: what do pregnant women think?
van Schendel, Rachèl V; Dondorp, Wybo J; Timmermans, Danielle R M; van Hugte, Eline J H; de Boer, Anne; Pajkrt, Eva; Lachmeijer, Augusta M A; Henneman, Lidewij.
Afiliación
  • van Schendel RV; Department of Clinical Genetics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Dondorp WJ; EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Timmermans DR; Department of Health, Ethics and Society, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Research Institutes GROW and CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
  • van Hugte EJ; EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • de Boer A; Department of Public and Occupational Health, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Pajkrt E; Department of Clinical Genetics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Lachmeijer AM; EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Henneman L; Department of Clinical Genetics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Prenat Diagn ; 35(6): 598-604, 2015 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25693726
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to study pregnant women's views on noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for Down syndrome and the potential to test for a broader range of conditions. METHODS: An online questionnaire available on the Dutch pregnancy fair website was completed by 381 pregnant women. RESULTS: Of the women, 51% expressed interest in having NIPT, including 33% of women who had declined first-trimester screening. The majority (73%) thought that the uptake of screening would increase with NIPT. Most women agreed that testing for life-threatening (89%), severe physical (79%), or severe mental (76%) disorders should be offered. A minority (29%) felt that prenatal screening should also be offered for late-onset disorders. Most (41%) preferred to have a free choice from a list of disorders, 31% preferred a 'closed offer', and 26% preferred choosing between packages of disorders. Although most women (76%) thought that screening for a broad range of conditions would avoid much suffering, 39% feared that it would confront couples with choices, the implications of which would be difficult to grasp. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the uptake of screening will increase with NIPT. If NIPT will be offered for a broad range of conditions, it is crucial to find a way that facilitates rather than undermines well-informed decision-making.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Diagnóstico Prenatal / ADN / Actitud Frente a la Salud / Síndrome de Down / Mujeres Embarazadas Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Screening_studies Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Prenat Diagn Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Diagnóstico Prenatal / ADN / Actitud Frente a la Salud / Síndrome de Down / Mujeres Embarazadas Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Screening_studies Aspecto: Determinantes_sociais_saude Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Prenat Diagn Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos
...