Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A prospective randomized evaluation of the TriGuard™ HDH embolic DEFLECTion device during transcatheter aortic valve implantation: results from the DEFLECT III trial.
Lansky, Alexandra J; Schofer, Joachim; Tchetche, Didier; Stella, Pieter; Pietras, Cody G; Parise, Helen; Abrams, Kevin; Forrest, John K; Cleman, Michael; Reinöhl, Jochen; Cuisset, Thomas; Blackman, Daniel; Bolotin, Gil; Spitzer, Stefan; Kappert, Utz; Gilard, Martine; Modine, Thomas; Hildick-Smith, David; Haude, Michael; Margolis, Pauliina; Brickman, Adam M; Voros, Szilard; Baumbach, Andreas.
Afiliación
  • Lansky AJ; Division of Cardiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA Yale Cardiovascular Research Group, New Haven, CT, USA alexandra.lansky@yale.edu alexandralansky@gmail.com.
  • Schofer J; Cardiovascular Center, Hamburg University, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Tchetche D; Department of Interventional Cardiology, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France.
  • Stella P; Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Pietras CG; Division of Cardiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA Yale Cardiovascular Research Group, New Haven, CT, USA.
  • Parise H; Division of Cardiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA Yale Cardiovascular Research Group, New Haven, CT, USA.
  • Abrams K; Department of Radiology, Baptist Hospital of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
  • Forrest JK; Division of Cardiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
  • Cleman M; Division of Cardiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
  • Reinöhl J; Department of Cardiology and Angiology I, Heart Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
  • Cuisset T; Department of Cardiology, CHU Timone, Marseille, France.
  • Blackman D; Department of Cardiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK.
  • Bolotin G; Department of Cardiac Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.
  • Spitzer S; Praxisklinik Herz und Gefäße, Dresden, Germany.
  • Kappert U; Herzzentrum Dresden GmbH, Universitätsklinik, Dresden, Germany.
  • Gilard M; Department of Cardiology, Brest University, Brest, France.
  • Modine T; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hôpital Cardiologique, Lille, France.
  • Hildick-Smith D; Sussex Cardiac Centre, Brighton and Sussex University Hospital NHS Trust, Brighton, UK.
  • Haude M; Sussex Cardiac Centre, Brighton and Sussex University Hospital NHS Trust, Brighton, UK.
  • Margolis P; Keystone Heart Ltd., Caesarea, Israel.
  • Brickman AM; Department of Neurology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA Taub Institute for Research on Alzheimer's Disease and the Aging Brain, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
  • Voros S; Global Institute for Research, Richmond, VA, USA.
  • Baumbach A; Bristol Heart Institute, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.
Eur Heart J ; 36(31): 2070-2078, 2015 Aug 14.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25990342
AIMS: To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and performance of the TriGuard™ HDH Embolic Deflection Device (TriGuard) compared with no cerebral protection in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). METHODS AND RESULTS: From February 2014 to March 2015, 85 subjects undergoing TAVI at 13 centres in Europe and Israel were randomized to TriGuard protection vs. no protection. Subjects underwent neurologic and cognitive evaluation at baseline, pre-discharge and 30 days; cerebral diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging was performed at 4 ± 2 days post-procedure and at 30 days. Technical success, which included complete 3-vessel cerebral coverage, was achieved in 88.9% (40/45) of cases. The primary in-hospital procedural safety endpoint (death, stroke, life-threatening or disabling bleeding, stage 2 or 3 acute kidney injury, or major vascular complications) occurred in 21.7% of TriGuard and 30.8% of control subjects (P = 0.34). In the Per Treatment population (subjects with complete three-vessel cerebral coverage), TriGuard use was associated with greater freedom from new ischaemic brain lesions (26.9 vs. 11.5%), fewer new neurologic deficits detected by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (3.1 vs. 15.4%), improved Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores, better performance on a delayed memory task (P = 0.028) at discharge, and a >2-fold increase in recovery of normal cognitive function (MoCA score >26) at 30 days. CONCLUSION: TriGuard cerebral protection during TAVI is safe and complete cerebral vessel coverage was achieved in 89% of subjects. In this exploratory study, subjects undergoing protected TAVI had more freedom from ischaemic brain lesions, fewer neurologic deficits, and improved cognitive function in some domains at discharge and 30 days compared with controls.
Palabras clave
Buscar en Google
Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Eur Heart J Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article
Buscar en Google
Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Eur Heart J Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article
...