Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A mathematical model approach quantifying patients' response to changes in mechanical ventilation: Evaluation in pressure support.
Larraza, S; Dey, N; Karbing, D S; Jensen, J B; Nygaard, M; Winding, R; Rees, S E.
Afiliación
  • Larraza S; Respiratory and Critical Care Group (RCARE), Center for Model-based Medical Decision Support, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
  • Dey N; Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Regions Hospital Herning, Herning, Denmark.
  • Karbing DS; Respiratory and Critical Care Group (RCARE), Center for Model-based Medical Decision Support, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
  • Jensen JB; Mermaid Care A/S, Nørresundby, Denmark.
  • Nygaard M; Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Regions Hospital Herning, Herning, Denmark.
  • Winding R; Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Regions Hospital Herning, Herning, Denmark.
  • Rees SE; Respiratory and Critical Care Group (RCARE), Center for Model-based Medical Decision Support, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark. Electronic address: sr@hst.aau.dk.
J Crit Care ; 30(5): 1008-15, 2015 Oct.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26067844
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

This article evaluates how mathematical models of gas exchange, blood acid-base status, chemical respiratory drive, and muscle function can describe the respiratory response of spontaneously breathing patients to different levels of pressure support.

METHODS:

The models were evaluated with data from 12 patients ventilated in pressure support ventilation. Models were tuned with clinical data (arterial blood gas measurement, ventilation, and respiratory gas fractions of O2 and CO2) to describe each patient at the clinical level of pressure support. Patients were ventilated up to 5 different pressure support levels, for 15 minutes at each level to achieve steady-state conditions. Model-simulated values of respiratory frequency (fR), arterial pH (pHa), and end-tidal CO2 (FeCO2) were compared to measured values at each pressure support level.

RESULTS:

Model simulations compared well to measured data with Bland-Altman bias and limits of agreement of fR of 0.7 ± 2.2 per minute, pHa of -0.0007 ± 0.019, and FeCO2 of -0.001 ± 0.003.

CONCLUSION:

The models describe patients' fR, pHa, and FeCO2 response to changes in pressure support with low bias and narrow limits of agreement.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Respiración Artificial / Músculos Respiratorios / Enfermedad Crítica Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Aged / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Crit Care Asunto de la revista: TERAPIA INTENSIVA Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Dinamarca

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Respiración Artificial / Músculos Respiratorios / Enfermedad Crítica Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Aged / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Crit Care Asunto de la revista: TERAPIA INTENSIVA Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Dinamarca
...