Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessment of implant position after total knee arthroplasty by dual-energy computed tomography.
Ferrara, Ferdinando; Cipriani, Antonio; Rapisarda, Santi; Iacobucci, Marta; Magarelli, Nicola; Leone, Antonello; Bonomo, Lorenzo.
Afiliación
  • Ferrara F; Department of Radiological Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, "A. Gemelli" Hospital, Rome, Italy ferdinandoferrara1@gmail.com.
  • Cipriani A; Department of Radiological Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, "A. Gemelli" Hospital, Rome, Italy.
  • Rapisarda S; Department of Radiological Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, "A. Gemelli" Hospital, Rome, Italy.
  • Iacobucci M; Department of Radiological Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, "A. Gemelli" Hospital, Rome, Italy.
  • Magarelli N; Department of Radiological Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, "A. Gemelli" Hospital, Rome, Italy.
  • Leone A; Department of Radiological Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, "A. Gemelli" Hospital, Rome, Italy.
  • Bonomo L; Department of Radiological Sciences, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, "A. Gemelli" Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Acta Radiol ; 57(5): 612-9, 2016 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26185267
BACKGROUND: Correct alignment of prosthetic components is the most important factor for the success of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) may be a reliable method in determining implant position after TKA. PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of DECT in determining implant position after TKA. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained. Forty-five patients (age 75.2 ± 6.4 years) prospectively underwent TKA at our institution between May and December 2012. DECT was performed 1 year after surgery, using an alignment similar to a standing position and generating images at an extrapolated energy of 120 kVp, in order to reduce metal artifacts. Implant position was evaluated by two independent readers. Intra- and inter-observer agreements were calculated. DECT measurements on implant position were compared with the preoperative planning based on radiographs. Additional clinical and DECT findings were taken into account. RESULTS: Metal artifact reduction was judged satisfactory in all cases. Regarding implant position assessed with DECT, good to excellent intra-observer (k: 0.74-0.87 and k: 0.75-0.88, respectively), and inter-observer agreement (k: 0.72-0.82) were found. In the comparison with preoperative planning, the widest limits of agreement were within 3.9° for the sagittal orientation of tibial component. A single patient with postoperative knee pain and stiffness had periprosthetic osteopenia, quadriceps femoris tendon calcifications, articular effusion, and excessive intrarotation of the femoral component. CONCLUSION: DECT is an accurate and reproducible tool for determining implant position after TKA.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X / Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla / Osteoartritis de la Rodilla Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Acta Radiol Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X / Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla / Osteoartritis de la Rodilla Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Acta Radiol Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia
...