Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Maximizing Patient Recruitment and Retention in a Secondary Stroke Prevention Clinical Trial: Lessons Learned from the STAND FIRM Study.
Thayabaranathan, Tharshanah; Cadilhac, Dominique A; Srikanth, Velandai K; Fitzgerald, Sharyn M; Evans, Roger G; Kim, Joosup; Gerraty, Richard P; Phan, Thanh G; Bladin, Christopher F; Nelson, Mark R; Frayne, Judith H; Thrift, Amanda G.
Afiliación
  • Thayabaranathan T; Stroke and Ageing Research, Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia; Department of Physiology, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Electronic address: tharshanah.thayabaranathan@monash.edu.
  • Cadilhac DA; Stroke and Ageing Research, Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia; Stroke Division, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medicine (Austin Health), The University of Melbourne,
  • Srikanth VK; Stroke and Ageing Research, Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia; Menzies Research Institute Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
  • Fitzgerald SM; Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Evans RG; Department of Physiology, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Kim J; Stroke and Ageing Research, Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
  • Gerraty RP; Department of Medicine, Epworth Healthcare, Monash University, Richmond, Victoria, Australia.
  • Phan TG; Stroke and Ageing Research, Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
  • Bladin CF; Stroke Division, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia; Department of Neurosciences, Box Hill Hospital, Monash University, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medicine, Box Hill Hospital, Monash University, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia.
  • Nelson MR; Menzies Research Institute Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia; Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
  • Frayne JH; Department of Neurology, The Alfred Hospital, Prahran, Victoria, Australia.
  • Thrift AG; Stroke and Ageing Research, Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia; Stroke Division, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis ; 25(6): 1371-80, 2016 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27009610
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Recruitment and retention of patients in a clinical trial is important for generalizability and robustness of findings. We aimed to investigate features of a study design that were associated with recruitment and retention in a Phase II and Phase III trial of a secondary prevention program for stroke.

METHODS:

Following informed consent in hospital, Phase II participants were randomized to intervention or usual care. Baseline clinical assessments were conducted at home approximately 3 months after discharge. In Phase III study, informed consent was obtained at home. We compared the characteristics of participants recruited and retained to 12 months for both phases. Interviews with study nurses were undertaken in order to ascertain their opinions of features of study design. Triangulation was used to identify the features of study design that nurses thought had improved recruitment and retention.

RESULTS:

All 24 eligible participants were recruited to the Phase II pilot study (100% recruitment), with 67% retention at 12 months. In Phase III study, 570 participants were recruited, and 93% of these participants had reached their 12-month assessment (n = 532) and were still participating. Consistent with the greater patient retention in Phase III study, nurses reported that patients' willingness to participate was greater when consent was obtained at home.

CONCLUSION:

Following a change in the consent process from hospital to home, more participants continued participation to 12 months. Pilot studies can provide important data to improve study design and better understand potential barriers to recruitment and retention.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Contexto en salud: 1_ASSA2030 / 2_ODS3 Problema de salud: 1_doencas_nao_transmissiveis / 2_muertes_prematuras_enfermedades_notrasmisibles Asunto principal: Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto / Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto / Ensayos Clínicos Fase II como Asunto / Selección de Paciente / Accidente Cerebrovascular / Prevención Secundaria Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA / CEREBRO Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Contexto en salud: 1_ASSA2030 / 2_ODS3 Problema de salud: 1_doencas_nao_transmissiveis / 2_muertes_prematuras_enfermedades_notrasmisibles Asunto principal: Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto / Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto / Ensayos Clínicos Fase II como Asunto / Selección de Paciente / Accidente Cerebrovascular / Prevención Secundaria Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA / CEREBRO Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article
...