Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The influence of somatostatin receptor scintigraphy during preoperative staging of non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours.
Jilesen, A P J; Hoefnagel, S J M; Busch, O R C; Bennink, R J; Gouma, D J; Nieveen van Dijkum, E J M.
Afiliación
  • Jilesen AP; Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: a.p.jilesen@amc.uva.nl.
  • Hoefnagel SJ; Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Busch OR; Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Bennink RJ; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Gouma DJ; Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Nieveen van Dijkum EJ; Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Clin Radiol ; 71(6): 537-42, 2016 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27016111
AIM: To determine whether somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) influences the preoperative staging and clinical management of non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (NF-pNETs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: All SRS examinations performed between 2002-2013 were selected. Patients with NF-pNET were included if both computed tomography (CT) and SRS was performed during preoperative staging. The diagnostic accuracy of CT and SRS for detecting NF-pNET metastases was analysed. Altered TNM classification and changed clinical management were calculated. Changed management was defined as a change from surgical resection into systemic treatment or vice versa. NF-pNETs were defined as tumours without clinical symptoms of hormonal hypersecretion. RESULTS: Overall, 62 patients with NF-pNET were included with a mean age of 57 years (SD: 12.4)(2). In 28 patients (45%), CT and SRS were correct and in agreement in the detection of primary tumour/metastases. In 34 patients (55%), one of the techniques was incorrect and therefore, there was no agreement. SRS altered the TNM classification in 14 patients (23%) and clinical management in nine patients (15%). In patients without metastases on CT, SRS detected lymph node metastases in one patient. The sensitivity to detect the primary tumour with CT was 95% and with SRS was 73%. In detecting metastases, the sensitivity and specificity were both 85% for CT versus 80% and 90% for SRS. CONCLUSION: Overall, CT and SRS were in agreement in the detection of NF-pNET. In NF-pNET without suspicious metastatic lesions on CT, SRS has limited value. SRS may be indicated to confirm lesions suspicious for neuroendocrine tumours metastases.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Receptores de Somatostatina / Tumores Neuroendocrinos Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Clin Radiol Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Receptores de Somatostatina / Tumores Neuroendocrinos Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Clin Radiol Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article
...