Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Palliative pelvic radiotherapy for symptomatic rectal cancer - a prospective multicenter study.
Cameron, Marte G; Kersten, Christian; Vistad, Ingvild; van Helvoirt, Rene; Weyde, Kjetil; Undseth, Christine; Mjaaland, Ingvil; Skovlund, Eva; Fosså, Sophie D; Guren, Marianne G.
Afiliación
  • Cameron MG; a Center for Cancer Treatment, Sørlandet Hospital , Kristiansand , Norway.
  • Kersten C; a Center for Cancer Treatment, Sørlandet Hospital , Kristiansand , Norway.
  • Vistad I; b Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sørlandet Hospital , Kristiansand , Norway.
  • van Helvoirt R; a Center for Cancer Treatment, Sørlandet Hospital , Kristiansand , Norway.
  • Weyde K; c Department of Oncology , Innlandet Hospital , Gjøvik , Norway.
  • Undseth C; d Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital , Oslo , Norway.
  • Mjaaland I; e Department of Oncology , Stavanger University Hospital , Stavanger , Norway.
  • Skovlund E; f Department of Public Health and General Practice , Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim and the Norwegian Institute of Public Health , Oslo , Norway.
  • Fosså SD; d Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital , Oslo , Norway.
  • Guren MG; d Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital , Oslo , Norway.
Acta Oncol ; 55(12): 1400-1407, 2016 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27332723
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

PURPOSE:

Palliative pelvic radiotherapy (PPRT) is used to treat locally advanced rectal cancer (RC) although symptomatic effects and toxicities are poorly documented. Aims were to evaluate symptom severity, quality of life (QOL) and toxicity after PPRT. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

Fifty-one patients with symptomatic primary or recurrent RC prescribed PPRT with fractions of 3 Gy to 30-39 Gy were included. Primary outcome was severity of target symptoms (TS) 12 weeks after PPRT. Pelvic symptom burden, toxicity, and QOL were assessed. Response was defined as patient-reported TS improvement or resolution.

RESULTS:

Pain (n = 24), rectal dysfunction (n = 16), and hematochezia (n = 9) were the most common TSs. Overall response rate among evaluable patients 12 weeks after PPRT was 28/33 (85%). Eighteen patients did not complete the study follow-up, 16 due to deteriorating health. TS responses were 10/13 (77%) for pain, 9/10 (90%) for rectal dysfunction, and 8/8 for hematochezia. Non-target pelvic symptom severity decreased and median QOL scores remained stable. There was no grade 4 toxicity. Median survival was nine months.

CONCLUSIONS:

In the majority of patients with symptomatic primary or recurrent RC, PPRT with 30-39 Gy contributes to pelvic symptom relief, with little toxicity. Patients prescribed PPRT of RC have limited life expectancy. Future studies should investigate simplification of PPRT.
Asunto(s)
Buscar en Google
Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cuidados Paliativos / Neoplasias Pélvicas / Calidad de Vida / Neoplasias del Recto / Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Acta Oncol Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Noruega
Buscar en Google
Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cuidados Paliativos / Neoplasias Pélvicas / Calidad de Vida / Neoplasias del Recto / Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Acta Oncol Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Noruega
...