Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Method of breast reconstruction and the development of lymphoedema.
Lee, K-T; Bang, S I; Pyon, J-K; Hwang, J H; Mun, G-H.
Afiliación
  • Lee KT; Departments of Plastic Surgery, Samsung Medical Centre, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Bang SI; Departments of Plastic Surgery, Samsung Medical Centre, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Pyon JK; Departments of Plastic Surgery, Samsung Medical Centre, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Hwang JH; Departments of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Samsung Medical Centre, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Mun GH; Departments of Plastic Surgery, Samsung Medical Centre, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Br J Surg ; 104(3): 230-237, 2017 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27861758
BACKGROUND: Several studies have demonstrated an association between immediate autologous or implant-based breast reconstruction and a reduced incidence of lymphoedema. However, few of these have ocused specifically on whether the reconstruction method affects the development of lymphoedema. The study evaluated the potential impact of breast reconstruction modality on the incidence of lymphoedema. METHODS: Outcomes of women with breast cancer who underwent mastectomy and immediate reconstruction using an autologous flap or a tissue expander/implant between 2008 and 2013 were reviewed. Arm or hand swelling with pertinent clinical signs of lymphoedema and excess volume compared with those of the contralateral side was diagnosed as lymphoedema. The cumulative incidence of lymphoedema was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Clinicopathological factors associated with the development of lymphoedema were investigated by Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 429 reconstructions (214 autologous and 215 tissue expander/implant) were analysed; the mean follow-up of patients was 45·3 months. The two groups had similar characteristics, except that women in the autologous group were older, had a higher BMI, and more often had preoperative radiotherapy than women in the tissue expander/implant group. Overall, the 2-year cumulative incidence of lymphoedema was 6·8 per cent (autologous 4·2 per cent, tissue expander/implant 9·3 per cent). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that autologous reconstruction was associated with a significantly reduced risk of lymphoedema compared with that for tissue expander/implant reconstruction. Axillary dissection, a greater number of dissected lymph nodes and postoperative chemotherapy were also independent risk factors for lymphoedema. CONCLUSION: The method of breast reconstruction may affect subsequent development of lymphoedema.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Complicaciones Posoperatorias / Mamoplastia / Linfedema Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Br J Surg Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Corea del Sur

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Complicaciones Posoperatorias / Mamoplastia / Linfedema Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Br J Surg Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Corea del Sur
...