Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of StrepBSelect Chromogenic Medium and the Fast-Track Diagnostics Group B Streptococcus (GBS) Real-Time PCR Assay Compared to Routine Culture for Detection of GBS during Antepartum Screening.
Church, Deirdre L; Baxter, Heather; Lloyd, Tracie; Larios, Oscar; Gregson, Daniel B.
Afiliación
  • Church DL; Division of Microbiology, Calgary Laboratory Services, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada Deirdre.church@cls.ab.ca.
  • Baxter H; Departments of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Lloyd T; Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Larios O; Department of Family Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Gregson DB; Division of Microbiology, Calgary Laboratory Services, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
J Clin Microbiol ; 55(7): 2137-2142, 2017 07.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28446575
ABSTRACT
Life-threatening infection in neonates due to group B Streptococcus (GBS) is preventable by screening of near-term pregnant women and treatment at delivery. A total of 295 vaginal-rectal swabs were collected from women attending antepartum clinics in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. GBS colonization was detected by the standard culture method (Strep B Carrot Broth subcultured to blood agar with a neomycin disk) and compared to recovery with Strep Group B Broth (Dalynn Biologicals) subcultured to StrepBSelect chromogenic medium (CM; Bio-Rad Laboratories) and the Fast-Track Diagnostics GBS real-time PCR (quantitative PCR [qPCR]) assay (Phoenix Airmid Biomedical Corp.) performed with broth-enriched samples and the Abbott m2000sp/m2000rt system. A total of 62/295 (21%) women were colonized with GBS; 58 (19.7%) cases were detected by standard culture, while CM and qPCR each found 61 (20.7%) cases. The qPCR and CM were similar in performance, with sensitivities, specificities, and positive and negative predictive values of 98.4 and 98.4%, 99.6 and 99.6%, 98.4 and 98.4%, and 99.6 and 99.6%, respectively, compared to routine culture. Both qPCR and CM would allow more rapid reporting of routine GBS screening results than standard culture. Although the cost per test was similar for standard culture and CM, the routine use of qPCR would cost approximately four times as much as culture-based detection. Laboratories worldwide should consider implementing one of the newer methods for primary GBS testing, depending on the cost limitations of different health care jurisdictions.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Contexto en salud: 1_ASSA2030 Problema de salud: 1_financiamento_saude Asunto principal: Infecciones Estreptocócicas / Streptococcus agalactiae / Tamizaje Masivo / Técnicas Bacteriológicas / Medios de Cultivo / Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Microbiol Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Contexto en salud: 1_ASSA2030 Problema de salud: 1_financiamento_saude Asunto principal: Infecciones Estreptocócicas / Streptococcus agalactiae / Tamizaje Masivo / Técnicas Bacteriológicas / Medios de Cultivo / Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Microbiol Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá
...