Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Recommended practice for laboratory reporting of non-invasive prenatal testing of trisomies 13, 18 and 21: a consensus opinion.
Deans, Zandra C; Allen, Stephanie; Jenkins, Lucy; Khawaja, Farrah; Hastings, Ros J; Mann, Kathy; Patton, Simon J; Sistermans, Erik A; Chitty, Lyn S.
Afiliación
  • Deans ZC; UK NEQAS for Molecular Genetics, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Allen S; West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
  • Jenkins L; North East Thames Regional Genetics Laboratory, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK.
  • Khawaja F; UK NEQAS for Molecular Genetics, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Hastings RJ; CEQAS, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
  • Mann K; Genetics Department, Viapath Analytics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.
  • Patton SJ; EMQN, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
  • Sistermans EA; Department of Clinical Genetics, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Chitty LS; UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health and Great Ormond Street NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Prenat Diagn ; 37(7): 699-704, 2017 Jul.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28497584
OBJECTIVE: Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for trisomies 13, 18 and 21 is used worldwide. Laboratory reports should provide clear, concise results with test limitations indicated, yet no national or local guidelines are currently available. Here, we aim to present minimum best practice guidelines. METHODS: All laboratories registered in the three European quality assurance schemes for molecular and cytogenetics were invited to complete an online survey focused on services provided for NIPT and non-invasive prenatal diagnosis. Laboratories delivering NIPT for aneuploidy were asked to submit two example reports; one high and one low risk result. Reports were reviewed for content and discussed at a meeting of laboratory providers and clinicians held at the ISPD 2016 conference in Berlin. RESULTS: Of the 122 laboratories that responded, 50 issued reports for NIPT and 43 of these submitted sample reports. Responses and reports were discussed by 72 attendees at the meeting. Consensus opinion was determined in several areas and used to develop best practice guidelines for reporting of NIPT results. CONCLUSIONS: Across Europe, there is considerable variation in reporting NIPT results. Here, we describe minimum best practice guidelines, which will be distributed to European laboratories, and reports audited in subsequent external quality assurance cycles. © 2017 The Authors. Prenatal Diagnosis published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trisomía / Pruebas de Detección del Suero Materno Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Qualitative_research Límite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Prenat Diagn Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trisomía / Pruebas de Detección del Suero Materno Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Qualitative_research Límite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Prenat Diagn Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article
...