Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clostridium difficile infections in Finland, 2008-2015: trends, diagnostics and ribotypes.
Mentula, S; Kotila, S M; Lyytikäinen, O; Ibrahem, S; Ollgren, J; Virolainen, A.
Afiliación
  • Mentula S; Bacterial Infections Unit, Department of Health Security, National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), P.O. Box 30, 00271, Helsinki, Finland. silja.mentula@thl.fi.
  • Kotila SM; Bacterial Infections Unit, Department of Health Security, National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), P.O. Box 30, 00271, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Lyytikäinen O; Infectious Disease Control Unit, Department of Health Security, National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), P.O. Box 30, 00271, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Ibrahem S; Bacterial Infections Unit, Department of Health Security, National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), P.O. Box 30, 00271, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Ollgren J; Infectious Disease Control Unit, Department of Health Security, National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), P.O. Box 30, 00271, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Virolainen A; Bacterial Infections Unit, Department of Health Security, National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), P.O. Box 30, 00271, Helsinki, Finland.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 36(10): 1939-1945, 2017 Oct.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28555402
We evaluated Clostridium difficile (CD) diagnostics in Finnish clinical microbiology laboratories during 2006-2011, with an update in 2015, in relation to CD surveillance data of the National Infectious Disease Register (NIDR) and ribotyping data from the national reference laboratory during the years 2008-2015. In 2011, diagnostic activity varied regionally more than three-fold and the positivity rate ranged between 7 and 21%. Nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) was implemented in the regions with high activity and NAAT users tested 30% more patients and found 15% more cases per population than those not using it. Culture was performed in 79% of laboratories, primary toxin testing by enzyme immunoassay (EIA) in 83% and by NAAT in 17%. In 2014, 12/19 laboratories used NAAT as the primary detection method and four as the secondary method, and ten cultured. Increasing usage of NAAT was not systematically related to various trends detected regionally in annual CD rates. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) ribotyping of 1771 CD isolates (4.1% of CD cases) identified 146 distinct profiles, of which 37% were binary toxin positive. The most common ribotype was 027, but its proportion decreased, while 078 slightly increased. Transition from culture to NAAT in CD infection (CDI) diagnostics did not cause a significant increase in the observed CDI incidence. Major differences between diagnostic activity, methods and strategies in different regions have persisted over the years, which should be considered when comparing the regional epidemiology of CDI.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Clostridioides difficile / Infecciones por Clostridium / Ribotipificación Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Asunto de la revista: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS / MICROBIOLOGIA Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Finlandia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Clostridioides difficile / Infecciones por Clostridium / Ribotipificación Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Asunto de la revista: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS / MICROBIOLOGIA Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Finlandia
...