Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Simultaneous patch testing with fragrance mix I, fragrance mix II and their ingredients in southern Sweden between 2009 and 2015.
Mowitz, Martin; Svedman, Cecilia; Zimerson, Erik; Isaksson, Marléne; Pontén, Ann; Bruze, Magnus.
Afiliación
  • Mowitz M; Lund University, Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, 205 02, Malmö, Sweden.
  • Svedman C; Lund University, Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, 205 02, Malmö, Sweden.
  • Zimerson E; Lund University, Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, 205 02, Malmö, Sweden.
  • Isaksson M; Lund University, Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, 205 02, Malmö, Sweden.
  • Pontén A; Lund University, Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, 205 02, Malmö, Sweden.
  • Bruze M; Lund University, Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, 205 02, Malmö, Sweden.
Contact Dermatitis ; 77(5): 280-287, 2017 Nov.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28685882
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Fragrance mix I (FM I) and fragrance mix II (FM II) are included in the European baseline series as screening substances for fragrance contact allergy.

OBJECTIVES:

To investigate the frequency of allergic reactions to FM I, FM II and their ingredients in consecutively patch tested patients. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A retrospective analysis of data from 4430 patients patch tested between 2009 and 2015 was performed.

RESULTS:

Of the patients, 6.5% were FM I-positive and 3.2% were FM II-positive. Forty-five per cent of FM I-positive patients did not have positive reactions to FM I ingredients. Thirty-five per cent of those who were FM II-positive did not have positive reactions to FM II ingredients. Twenty-seven per cent of those with positive reactions to one or more of the FM I ingredients were FM I-negative, and 36% of those who had positive reactions to one or more of the FM II ingredients were FM II-negative. The allergens with the highest pick-up rates were Evernia prunastri (1.8%), cinnamal (1.3%), citral (1.2%), and hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (1.2%). Significant differences were observed in the proportions of positive reactions to FM I, FM II, eugenol, isoeugenol, and farnesol when results from patch testing with materials from different suppliers were compared.

CONCLUSIONS:

There is a risk of missing fragrance contact allergy when testing with only the fragrance mixes is performed. The use of preparations from different suppliers may affect the patch test results.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Perfumes / Pruebas del Parche / Alérgenos / Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Contact Dermatitis Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suecia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Perfumes / Pruebas del Parche / Alérgenos / Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Contact Dermatitis Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suecia
...