Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Match of psychosocial risk and psychosocial care in families of a child with cancer.
Sint Nicolaas, S M; Schepers, S A; van den Bergh, E M M; de Boer, Y; Streng, I; van Dijk-Lokkart, E M; Grootenhuis, M A; Verhaak, C M.
Afiliación
  • Sint Nicolaas SM; Department of Medical Psychology, Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Schepers SA; Psychosocial Department, Emma Children's Hospital Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van den Bergh EMM; Psychosocial Department, Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • de Boer Y; Psychosocial Department, Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Streng I; Psychosocial Department, Emma Children's Hospital Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van Dijk-Lokkart EM; Department of Medical Psychology, Sophia Children's Hospital Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Grootenhuis MA; Department of Medical Psychology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Verhaak CM; Psychosocial Department, Emma Children's Hospital Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Pediatr Blood Cancer ; 64(12)2017 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28914485
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT) was developed to screen for psychosocial risk, aimed to be supportive in directing psychosocial care to families of a child with cancer. This study aimed to determine (i) the match between PAT risk score and provided psychosocial care with healthcare professionals blind to outcome of PAT assessment, and (ii) the match between PAT risk score and team risk estimation.

METHODS:

Eighty-three families of children with cancer from four pediatric oncology centers in the Netherlands participated (59% response rate). The PAT and team risk estimation was assessed at diagnosis (M = 40.2 days, SD = 14.1 days), and the content of provided psychosocial care in the 5-month period thereafter resulting in basic or specialized care.

RESULTS:

According to the PAT, 65% of families were defined as having low (universal), 30% medium (targeted), and 5% high (clinical) risk for developing psychosocial problems. Thirty percent of patients from universal group got basic psychosocial care, 63% got specialized care, and 7% did not get any care. Fourteen percent of the families at risk got basic care, 86% got specialized care. Team risk estimations and PAT risk scores matched with 58% of the families.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study showed that families at risk, based on standardized risk assessment with the PAT, received more specialized care than families without risk. However, still 14% of the families with high risks only received basic care, and 63% of the families with standard risk got specialized care. Standardized risk assessment can be used as part of comprehensive care delivery, complementing the team.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Medición de Riesgo / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adolescent / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Pediatr Blood Cancer Asunto de la revista: HEMATOLOGIA / NEOPLASIAS / PEDIATRIA Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Medición de Riesgo / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adolescent / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Pediatr Blood Cancer Asunto de la revista: HEMATOLOGIA / NEOPLASIAS / PEDIATRIA Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos
...