Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
How to stent the ureter after kidney transplantation in children?-A comparison of two methods of urinary drainage.
Ter Haar, Anuradha S; Parekh, Rulan S; Leunissen, Ralph W J; van den, Joop; Lorenzo, Armando J; Hebert, Diane; Keijzer-Veen, Mandy G; Cransberg, Karlien.
Afiliación
  • Ter Haar AS; Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Parekh RS; Department of Pediatric Nephrology, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
  • Leunissen RWJ; Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van den J; Department of Pediatric Urology, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Lorenzo AJ; Division of Urology, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
  • Hebert D; Department of Pediatric Nephrology, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
  • Keijzer-Veen MG; Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Cransberg K; Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Pediatr Transplant ; 22(1)2018 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29080255
Ureteral stenting after pediatric renal transplantation serves to prevent obstruction and urinary leakage, but can also cause complications. This study compares the complication rates of both methods. Data were retrospectively collected at Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (splint group, n = 61) and Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada (JJ catheter group, n = 50). Outcome measures included urological interventions and incidence of UTIs during the first 3 months post-transplantation. The splint was removed after a median of 9 (IQR 8-12), the JJ catheter after 42 (IQR 36-50) days. Seven (11.5%) children in the splint group needed at least one urological re-intervention versus two in the JJ catheter group (P-value .20). UTIs developed in 19 children (31.1%) in the splint group and in twenty-five (50.0%) children in the JJ catheter group (P-value .04), with a total number of 27 vs. 57 UTIs (P-value .02). Nine (33.3%) vs. 35 (61.4%) of these, respectively, occurred during the presence of the splint (P-value <.001). Children with a JJ catheter developed more UTIs than children with a splint; the latter, however, tended to require more re-interventions. Modification of either method is needed to find the best way to stent the ureter.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Complicaciones Posoperatorias / Obstrucción Ureteral / Cateterismo Urinario / Stents / Drenaje / Trasplante de Riñón Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adolescent / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male / Newborn Idioma: En Revista: Pediatr Transplant Asunto de la revista: PEDIATRIA / TRANSPLANTE Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Complicaciones Posoperatorias / Obstrucción Ureteral / Cateterismo Urinario / Stents / Drenaje / Trasplante de Riñón Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adolescent / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male / Newborn Idioma: En Revista: Pediatr Transplant Asunto de la revista: PEDIATRIA / TRANSPLANTE Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos
...