Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Nonclinical Safety Assessment of Anti-Factor D: Key Strategies and Challenges for the Nonclinical Development of Intravitreal Biologics.
Bantseev, Vladimir; Erickson, Rebecca; Leipold, Douglas; Amaya, Caroline; Miller, Paul E; Booler, Helen; Thackaberry, Evan A.
Afiliación
  • Bantseev V; 1 Department of Safety Assessment, Genentech, Inc. , South San Francisco, California.
  • Erickson R; 2 Development Sciences, Denali Therapeutics , South San Francisco, California.
  • Leipold D; 3 Department of Preclinical and Translational Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, Genentech, Inc. , South San Francisco, California.
  • Amaya C; 4 Department of Bioanalytical Assays, Genentech, Inc. , South San Francisco, California.
  • Miller PE; 5 Ocular Services on Demand (OSOD) Department of Surgical Services, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison , Madison, Wisconsin.
  • Booler H; 1 Department of Safety Assessment, Genentech, Inc. , South San Francisco, California.
  • Thackaberry EA; 1 Department of Safety Assessment, Genentech, Inc. , South San Francisco, California.
J Ocul Pharmacol Ther ; 34(1-2): 204-213, 2018.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29148965
PURPOSE: The nonclinical toxicology program described here was designed to characterize the safety profile of anti-factor D (AFD; FCFD4514S, lampalizumab) to support intravitreal (ITV) administration in patients with geographic atrophy (GA). METHODS: The toxicity of AFD was assessed in a single-dose and 6-month repeat-dose study in monkeys at doses up to 10 mg/eye. Toxicity was assessed by clinical ophthalmic examinations, intraocular pressure measurements, ocular photography, electroretinography, fluorescein angiography, optical coherence tomography, and anatomic pathology. RESULTS: Systemic exposure to AFD generally increased with the increase in dose level. The increases in mean maximal concentration and area under the curve values were roughly dose proportional. No accumulation of AFD was observed following 10 doses, and drug exposures were not affected by anti-drug antibodies. AFD was locally and systemically well tolerated in monkeys following ITV doses of up to 10 mg/eye. Ocular effects associated with AFD were limited to transient, reversible, dose-related, aqueous cell responses and injection-related, mild, vitreal cell responses. In the 6-month repeat-dose study, 2 monkeys had a nonspecific immune response to AFD that resulted in severe ocular inflammation, attributed to administration of a heterologous (humanized) protein. CONCLUSIONS: The comprehensive toxicology program in monkeys described here was designed to evaluate the safety profile of AFD and to support multiple ITV injections in the clinic. Administration of a heterologous (humanized) protein presents a challenge, and immunogenicity in nonclinical species is not predictive of immunogenicity in humans. Taken together, the results of the nonclinical program described here support the use of AFD in patients with GA.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Soluciones Oftálmicas / Fragmentos Fab de Inmunoglobulinas / Presión Intraocular Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: J Ocul Pharmacol Ther Asunto de la revista: FARMACOLOGIA / OFTALMOLOGIA / TERAPEUTICA Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Soluciones Oftálmicas / Fragmentos Fab de Inmunoglobulinas / Presión Intraocular Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: J Ocul Pharmacol Ther Asunto de la revista: FARMACOLOGIA / OFTALMOLOGIA / TERAPEUTICA Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article
...