Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of Overall Response Rate and Progression-Free Survival as Potential Surrogate Endpoints for Overall Survival in Immunotherapy Trials.
Mushti, Sirisha L; Mulkey, Flora; Sridhara, Rajeshwari.
Afiliación
  • Mushti SL; Office of Biostatistics, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland. Sirisha.Mushti@fda.hhs.gov.
  • Mulkey F; Office of Biostatistics, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.
  • Sridhara R; Office of Biostatistics, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Clin Cancer Res ; 24(10): 2268-2275, 2018 05 15.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29326281
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

With the approval of immunotherapies for a variety of indications, methods to assess treatment benefit addressing the response patterns observed are important. We evaluated RECIST criteria-based overall response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) as potential surrogate endpoints of overall survival (OS), and explored a modified definition of PFS by altering the threshold percentage determining disease progression to assess the association with survival benefit in immunotherapy trials.Experimental

Design:

Thirteen randomized, multicenter, active-control trials containing immunotherapeutic agents submitted to the FDA were analyzed. Associations between treatment effects of ORR, PFS, modified PFS, and OS were evaluated at individual and trial levels. Patient-level responder analysis was performed for PFS and OS.

Results:

The coefficient of determination (R²) measured the strength of associations, where values near 1 imply surrogacy and values close to 0 suggest no association. At the trial level, the association between hazard ratios (HR) of PFS and OS was R2 = 0.1303, and between the odds ratio (OR) of ORR and HR of OS was R2 = 0.1277. At the individual level, the Spearman rank correlation coefficient between PFS and OS was 0.61. Trial-level associations between modified PFS and OS ranged between 0.07 and 0.1, and individual-level correlations were approximately 0.6. HRs of PFS and OS for responders versus nonresponders were 0.129 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.11-0.15] and 0.118 (95% CI, 0.11-0.13), respectively.

Conclusions:

Although responders exhibited longer survival and PFS than nonresponders, the trial-level and individual-level associations were weak between PFS/ORR and OS. Modifications to PFS did not improve associations. Clin Cancer Res; 24(10); 2268-75. ©2018 AACRSee related commentary by Korn and Freidlin, p. 2239.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Cancer Res Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Cancer Res Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article
...