Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Summary of 2017 FDA Public Workshop: Antibody-mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplantation.
Velidedeoglu, Ergun; Cavaillé-Coll, Marc W; Bala, Shukal; Belen, Ozlem A; Wang, Yan; Albrecht, Renata.
Afiliación
  • Velidedeoglu E; Division of Transplant and Ophthalmology Products, Office of Antimicrobial Products, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, FDA, Silver Spring, MD.
  • Cavaillé-Coll MW; Division of Transplant and Ophthalmology Products, Office of Antimicrobial Products, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, FDA, Silver Spring, MD.
  • Bala S; Division of Transplant and Ophthalmology Products, Office of Antimicrobial Products, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, FDA, Silver Spring, MD.
  • Belen OA; Division of Transplant and Ophthalmology Products, Office of Antimicrobial Products, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, FDA, Silver Spring, MD.
  • Wang Y; Division of Biometrics IV, Office of Biostatistics, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, FDA, Silver Spring, MD.
  • Albrecht R; Division of Transplant and Ophthalmology Products, Office of Antimicrobial Products, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, FDA, Silver Spring, MD.
Transplantation ; 102(6): e257-e264, 2018 06.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29470345
Despite major advances in understanding the pathophysiology of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR); prevention, diagnosis and treatment remain unmet medical needs. It appears that early T cell-mediated rejection, de novo donor-specific antibody (dnDSA) formation and AMR result from patient or physician initiated suboptimal immunosuppression, and represent landmarks in an ongoing process rather than separate events. On April 12 and 13, 2017, the Food and Drug Administration sponsored a public workshop on AMR in kidney transplantation to discuss new advances, importance of immunosuppressive medication nonadherence in dnDSA formation, associations between AMR, cellular rejection, changes in glomerular filtration rate, and challenges of clinical trial design for the prevention and treatment of AMR. Key messages from the workshop are included in this summary. Distinction between type 1 (due to preexisting DSA) and type 2 (due to dnDSA) phenotypes of AMR needs to be considered in patient management and clinical trial design. Standardization and more widespread adoption of routine posttransplant DSA monitoring may permit timely diagnosis and understanding of the natural course of type 2 and chronic AMR. Clinical trial design, especially as related to type 2 and chronic AMR, has specific challenges, including the high prevalence of nonadherence in the population at risk, indolent nature of the process until the appearance of graft dysfunction, and the absence of accepted surrogate endpoints. Other challenges include sample size and study duration, which could be mitigated by enrichment strategies.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: United States Food and Drug Administration / Linfocitos T / Trasplante de Riñón / Rechazo de Injerto / Antígenos HLA / Isoanticuerpos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Transplantation Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: United States Food and Drug Administration / Linfocitos T / Trasplante de Riñón / Rechazo de Injerto / Antígenos HLA / Isoanticuerpos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Transplantation Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article
...