Pilot-scale evaluation of micropollutant abatements by conventional ozonation, UV/O3, and an electro-peroxone process.
Water Res
; 138: 106-117, 2018 07 01.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-29574198
ABSTRACT
The electro-peroxone (E-peroxone) process is an emerging ozone-based advanced oxidation process (AOP) that has shown large potential for micropollutant abatement in water treatment. To evaluate its performance under more realistic conditions of water treatment, a continuous-flow pilot E-peroxone system was developed and compared with conventional ozonation and a UV/O3 process for micropollutant abatements in various water matrices (groundwater, surface water, and secondary wastewater effluent) in this study. With a specific ozone dose of 1.5â¯mg O3/mg DOC, micropollutants that have high and moderate reactivity with ozone (O3) (diclofenac, naproxen, gemfibrozil, and bezafibrate) could be sufficiently abated (>90% abatement) in the various waters by all three processes. However, ozone-resistant micropollutants (ibuprofen, clofibric acid, and chloramphenicol) were abated only by â¼32-68%, 68-91%, and 73-90% during conventional ozonation of the selected groundwater, surface water, and secondary wastewater effluent, respectively. By electro-generating H2O2 or applying UV irradiation to enhance O3 transformation to â¢OH during ozonation, the E-peroxone and UV/O3 processes similarly enhanced the abatement efficiencies of ozone-resistant micropollutants by â¼15-43%, â¼5-15%, and â¼5-10% in the groundwater, surface water, and secondary wastewater effluent, respectively. In addition, the E-peroxone and UV/O3 processes significantly reduced bromate formation during the treatment of the three waters compared to conventional ozonation. Due to its higher efficiency, the E-peroxone process reduced â¼10-53% of the energy consumption required to abate the concentration of chloramphenicol (the most ozone-resistant micropollutant spiked in the waters) by 1 order of magnitude in the three waters compared to conventional ozonation. In contrast, the UV/O3 process consumed approximately 4-10 times higher energy than conventional ozonation. This pilot-scale study demonstrates that the E-peroxone process can provide a feasible, effective, and energy-efficient alternative for micropollutant abatement and bromate control in water and wastewater treatment.
Palabras clave
Texto completo:
1
Colección:
01-internacional
Base de datos:
MEDLINE
Contexto en salud:
2_ODS3
Problema de salud:
2_quimicos_contaminacion
Asunto principal:
Ozono
/
Rayos Ultravioleta
/
Contaminantes Químicos del Agua
/
Eliminación de Residuos Líquidos
/
Peróxido de Hidrógeno
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Water Res
Año:
2018
Tipo del documento:
Article
País de afiliación:
China