Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Efficacy and Safety of Conventional and Hypofractionated High-Dose Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer in an Elderly Population: A Subgroup Analysis of the CHHiP Trial.
Wilson, James M; Dearnaley, David P; Syndikus, Isabel; Khoo, Vincent; Birtle, Alison; Bloomfield, David; Choudhury, Ananya; Graham, John; Ferguson, Catherine; Malik, Zafar; Money-Kyrle, Julian; O'Sullivan, Joe M; Panades, Miguel; Parker, Chris; Rimmer, Yvonne; Scrase, Christopher; Staffurth, John; Stockdale, Andrew; Cruickshank, Clare; Griffin, Clare; Hall, Emma.
Afiliación
  • Wilson JM; Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust/Kings College, London, UK.
  • Dearnaley DP; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. Electronic address: david.dearnaley@icr.ac.uk.
  • Syndikus I; Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Wirral, UK.
  • Khoo V; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Birtle A; Rosemere Cancer Centre, Royal Preston Hospital/University of Manchester, Preston, UK.
  • Bloomfield D; Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals, Brighton, UK.
  • Choudhury A; Christie Hospital, Manchester, UK.
  • Graham J; Beacon Centre, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, UK.
  • Ferguson C; Sheffield Teaching Hospitals Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
  • Malik Z; Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Wirral, UK.
  • Money-Kyrle J; Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK.
  • O'Sullivan JM; Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
  • Panades M; Lincoln County Hospital, Lincoln, UK.
  • Parker C; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Rimmer Y; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
  • Scrase C; Ipswich Hospital, Ipswich, UK.
  • Staffurth J; Cardiff University/Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK.
  • Stockdale A; University Hospital Coventry, Coventry, UK.
  • Cruickshank C; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
  • Griffin C; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
  • Hall E; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 100(5): 1179-1189, 2018 04 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29722660
PURPOSE: Outcome data on radiation therapy for prostate cancer in an elderly population are sparse. The CHHiP (Conventional or Hypofractionated High Dose Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer) trial provides a large, prospectively collected, contemporary dataset in which to explore outcomes by age. METHODS AND MATERIALS: CHHiP participants received 3 to 6 months of androgen deprivation therapy and were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive 74 Gy in 37 fractions (conventional fractionation), 60 Gy in 20 fractions, or 57 Gy in 19 fractions. Toxicity was assessed using clinician-reported outcome (CRO) and patient-reported outcome questionnaires. Participants were categorized as aged < 75 years or ≥ 75 years. Outcomes were compared by age group. RESULTS: Of 3216 patients, 491 (15%) were aged ≥ 75 years. There was no difference in biochemical or clinical failure rates between the groups aged < 75 years and ≥ 75 years for any of the fractionation schedules. In the group aged ≥ 75 years, biochemical or clinical failure-free rates favored hypofractionation, and at 5 years, they were 84.7% for 74 Gy, 91% for 60 Gy, and 87.7% for 57 Gy. The incidence of CRO (grade 3) acute bowel toxicity was 2% in both age groups. The incidence of grade 3 acute bladder toxicity was 8% in patients aged < 75 years and 7% in those aged ≥ 75 years. The 5-year cumulative incidence of CRO grade ≥ 2 late bowel side effects was similar in both age groups. However, in the group aged ≥ 75 years, there was a suggestion of a higher cumulative incidence of bowel bother (small or greater) with 60 Gy compared with 74 Gy and 57 Gy. Patient-reported bladder bother was slightly higher in the group aged ≥ 75 years than the group aged < 75 years, and there was a suggestion of a lower cumulative incidence of bladder bother with 57 Gy compared with 74 Gy and 60 Gy in patients aged ≥ 75 years, which was not evident in those aged < 75 years. CONCLUSIONS: Hypofractionated radiation therapy appears to be well tolerated and effective in men aged ≥ 75 years. The 57-Gy schedule has potential advantages in that it may moderate long-term side effects without compromising treatment efficacy in this group.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Próstata / Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada / Hipofraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Próstata / Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada / Hipofraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Aspecto: Patient_preference Límite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article
...