Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Drug interaction screening in SWOG clinical trials.
Hertz, Daniel L; Siden, Rivka; Modlin, Jessie; Gabel, Linda Lee; Wong, Siu Fun.
Afiliación
  • Hertz DL; Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor, MI dlhertz@med.umich.edu.
  • Siden R; Oncology Clinical Trials Support Unit, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
  • Modlin J; St. Luke's Mountain States Tumor Institute, Boise, ID.
  • Gabel LL; Smilow Hospital at Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT.
  • Wong SF; Chapman University School of Pharmacy, Irvine, CA.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 75(10): 607-612, 2018 May 15.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29748299
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The frequency and process for drug interaction (DI) screening at sites enrolling patients into SWOG clinical trials were studied.

METHODS:

Survey invitations were e-mailed to 180 SWOG head clinical research associates to determine the frequency of and personnel involved in DI assessment in subjects who were screened for and enrolled in clinical trials at their sites. Descriptive statistics were performed to evaluate the data.

RESULTS:

A total of 83 surveys recorded a response to at least 1 question, yielding an overall response rate of 46.1%. At least 72 completed surveys were submitted, for a completion rate of 40.0%. The majority of sites (51%) reported that DI screening only occurred during eligibility assessment when a DI was included in the protocol exclusion criteria. The pharmacist was "always" involved in DI screening during eligibility assessment at 17% of sites. Clinical research coordinators (56%) and research nurses (45%) were the predominant personnel who performed DI screening to assess eligibility for trial enrollment. A subset of sites (3-6%) reported not having access to a pharmacist. Fewer than 10% of sites reported that they "always" use drug information services, websites, resources, or literature searches, though many tools were used "often" or "sometimes" by more than 20% of sites.

CONCLUSION:

A survey revealed that DI screening was not being systematically conducted within SWOG clinical trials. When DI screening did occur, it was primarily conducted by clinical research coordinators or study nurses. Pharmacist-led DI screening was not the current practice within SWOG sites surveyed and was precluded by a lack of pharmacists' availability or involvement.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Contexto en salud: 1_ASSA2030 Problema de salud: 1_medicamentos_vacinas_tecnologias Asunto principal: Farmacéuticos / Servicios Farmacéuticos / Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto / Interacciones Farmacológicas Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Screening_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Am J Health Syst Pharm Asunto de la revista: FARMACIA / HOSPITAIS Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Contexto en salud: 1_ASSA2030 Problema de salud: 1_medicamentos_vacinas_tecnologias Asunto principal: Farmacéuticos / Servicios Farmacéuticos / Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto / Interacciones Farmacológicas Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Screening_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Am J Health Syst Pharm Asunto de la revista: FARMACIA / HOSPITAIS Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article
...