Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mechanical Performance of Two Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Systems: In Vitro Comparison of Tug Force, Radial Force, Sealing and Deformation.
Menne, Matthias F; Schrickel, Jan W; Nickenig, Georg; Al-Kassou, Baravan; Nelles, Dominik; Schmitz-Rode, Thomas; Steinseifer, Ulrich; Sedaghat, Alexander.
Afiliación
  • Menne MF; Institute of Applied Medical Engineering, Helmholtz Institute, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
  • Schrickel JW; Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
  • Nickenig G; Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
  • Al-Kassou B; Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
  • Nelles D; Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
  • Schmitz-Rode T; Institute of Applied Medical Engineering, Helmholtz Institute, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
  • Steinseifer U; Institute of Applied Medical Engineering, Helmholtz Institute, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
  • Sedaghat A; Monash Institute of Medical Engineering and Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Ann Biomed Eng ; 46(9): 1337-1347, 2018 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29797140
ABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to establish in vitro bench-tests of left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAo) devices regarding tug force, radial force and sealing capacity. Two LAAo devices, namely the WATCHMAN™ and the Occlutech®, of three different sizes underwent testing in novel dedicated in vitro setups. Radial force was assessed in a commercial radial force tester. At baseline, tug force of the WATCHMAN™ was significantly higher when compared to Occlutech® for all devices. Repeated resheathing resulted in a reduction of device-diameter in the WATCHMAN™ devices of max. 7.9%, whereas diameters of Occlutech® occluders remained unchanged. Tug force was not significantly impacted by resheathing in both devices. At baseline, sealing capacity in a bench-test using silicone LAA-models did not differ between the devices. Resheathing lead to an in vitro loss of sealing capacity of the WATCHMAN™ devices, increasing with resheathing and resulting in a max. peridevice leak of 91.1 ± 7.9%. Radial force was higher for the Occlutech® devices and decreased for WATCHMAN™ occluders after resheathing. The WATCHMAN™ occluder series showed progressive deformation, increased peridevice leakage and decreased radial force after resheathing, presumably as a result of diameter reduction. Tug force of the WATCHMAN™ was not impaired by resheathing and was significantly higher than that of the Occlutech® device.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Apéndice Atrial / Dispositivo Oclusor Septal Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Ann Biomed Eng Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Apéndice Atrial / Dispositivo Oclusor Septal Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Ann Biomed Eng Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania
...