Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Reappraising the role of motor surround inhibition in dystonia.
Kassavetis, Panagiotis; Sadnicka, Anna; Saifee, Tabish A; Pareés, Isabel; Kojovic, Maja; Bhatia, Kailash P; Rothwell, John C; Edwards, Mark J.
Afiliación
  • Kassavetis P; Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK; Department of Neurology, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: p.kassavetis.09@ucl.ac.uk.
  • Sadnicka A; Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK.
  • Saifee TA; Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK.
  • Pareés I; Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK.
  • Kojovic M; Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK; Department of Neurology, University Clinical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia.
  • Bhatia KP; Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK.
  • Rothwell JC; Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK.
  • Edwards MJ; Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK.
J Neurol Sci ; 390: 178-183, 2018 07 15.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29801882
BACKGROUND: Surround inhibition (SI) in the motor system has been described to be decreased in patients with focal hand dystonia (FHD) but no evidence currently exists for patients with cervical dystonia (CD). OBJECTIVE: To characterise the SI profiles in three groups of participants: healthy volunteers, patients with FHD and patients with CD. To provide sample size calculations for future studies. METHODS: SI was assessed using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) in 31 right-handed healthy participants, 11 patients with CD and 12 patients with FHD. In addition data of SI in patients with FHD were extracted from previously published and analysed for sample size calculations and assessment of SI variability. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference in SI was found amongst the groups (healthy, FHD, CD). Analysis of combined current and previous data suggests that our study and all prior studies were underpowered. At least 26 participants in each group are required for a simple comparison of two groups. Analysis of published data indicated that SI is more variable in FHD patients compared to healthy controls. CONCLUSIONS: The highly variable SI in patients with dystonia can confound statistical comparisons of mean differences. Larger studies are needed to assess SI in dystonia and to explore the origins of its variability.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Tortícolis / Trastornos Distónicos Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Neurol Sci Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Tortícolis / Trastornos Distónicos Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Neurol Sci Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article
...