Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Usefulness of PET/CT 18-FDG for the diagnosis and follow-up of urological, urothelial and kidney tumours. / Utilidad de la PET/TC 18-FDG en diagnóstico y seguimiento de tumores urológicos uroteliales y renales.
González-Ruiz de León, C; García-Rodríguez, J; Pérez-Castro, N; Vigil-Díaz, C; Pérez-Haro, M L; Fernández-Gómez, J M.
Afiliación
  • González-Ruiz de León C; Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, España. Electronic address: cgruizleon@gmail.com.
  • García-Rodríguez J; Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, España.
  • Pérez-Castro N; Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, España.
  • Vigil-Díaz C; Servicio de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, España.
  • Pérez-Haro ML; Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, España.
  • Fernández-Gómez JM; Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, España.
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed) ; 43(1): 32-38, 2019.
Article en En, Es | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30100141
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

New imaging studies have appeared in recent years for the diagnosis and follow-up of metastatic urological tumours. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

A total of 41 patients were reviewed with suspected recurrence of a urothelial or kidney tumour, analysing the diagnostic performance of PET-CT scans undertaken between 2013 and 2016.

RESULTS:

We collected 17 urothelial tumours and 24 renal tumours, with a median follow-up of 30 months. A total of 39.3% of the urothelial tumours were high grade and 29.3% of the kidney tumours were clear cell Fuhrman II. As a whole, the imaging studies detected recurrences in 34 patients. CT was positive in 83% of the patients, while the PET scan was positive in 75.6%, CT/PET coincidence was 50%. The PET scan detected further disease in 41% of the cases compared to 5% by CT. This resulted in a change of therapeutic strategy in 40% of the patients. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for the CT and the PET scans were 92% and 92%, 57% and 100%, 92% and 100%, and 57% and 70% respectively.

CONCLUSION:

The PET scan showed similar sensitivity for urological tumours to the standard imaging techniques but with higher specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. This led to a change in treatment strategy for 40% of the patients in our series. The PET scan will probably become the standard test in the extension and follow-up studies of most urological tumours.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Radioisótopos de Flúor / Neoplasias Urológicas / Radiofármacos / Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18 / Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En / Es Revista: Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed) Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Radioisótopos de Flúor / Neoplasias Urológicas / Radiofármacos / Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18 / Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En / Es Revista: Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed) Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article
...