Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Chemotherapy and biologic use in the routine management of metastatic colorectal cancer in Australia: is clinical practice following the evidence?
Semira, Christine; Wong, Hui-Li; Field, Kathryn; Lee, Margaret; Lee, Belinda; Nott, Louise; Shapiro, Jeremy; Wong, Rachel; Tie, Jeanne; Tran, Ben; Richardson, Gary; Zimet, Allan; Lipton, Lara; Tamjid, Babak; Burge, Matthew; Ma, Brigette; Johns, Julie; Harold, Michael; Gibbs, Peter.
Afiliación
  • Semira C; Systems Biology and Personalised Medicine Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Wong HL; Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Field K; Systems Biology and Personalised Medicine Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Lee M; Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Lee B; Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Nott L; Department of Medical Oncology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Shapiro J; Systems Biology and Personalised Medicine Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Wong R; Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Tie J; Department of Medical Oncology, Western Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Tran B; Department of Medical Oncology, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Richardson G; Systems Biology and Personalised Medicine Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Zimet A; Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Lipton L; Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
  • Tamjid B; Department of Medical Oncology, Cabrini Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Burge M; Systems Biology and Personalised Medicine Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Ma B; Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Johns J; Department of Medical Oncology, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Harold M; Systems Biology and Personalised Medicine Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Gibbs P; Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Intern Med J ; 49(4): 446-454, 2019 04.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30230679
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Emerging evidence on the optimal use of chemotherapy and biologics in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer should impact management in routine care. Recent studies have demonstrated benefits for initial triplet chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and irinotecan, FOLFOXIRI) and for initial treatment with an epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor (EGFRi) in patients with a RAS wild-type tumour and a left-sided primary tumour.

AIM:

To explore evolving pattern of metastatic colorectal cancer care over time in Australia.

METHODS:

We analysed data from the Treatment of Recurrent and Advanced Colorectal Cancer registry.

RESULTS:

From July 2009 to December 2017, 2552 metastatic colorectal cancer patients were entered into the Treatment of Recurrent and Advanced Colorectal Cancer registry. Of 1585 patients who initially underwent chemotherapy, treatment was with a doublet in 76%. FOLFOXIRI was given to 22 patients (1.4%), mostly young patients and those with potentially resectable disease. Along with first-line chemotherapy, 61% received bevacizumab, while 3.3% received an EGFRi, predominantly over the last 2 years. Within the KRAS wild-type left-sided tumour cohort, EGFRi use increased from 9% in 2015 to 37% in 2017. Across treatment sites, there was a wide variation in the utilisation of FOLFOXIRI and EGFRi therapy; bevacizumab use was more consistent. A clear impact on survival outcomes from these regimens is not evident, potentially due to multiple confounders.

CONCLUSION:

Doublet chemotherapy + bevacizumab remains the dominant initial strategy, with limited uptake of triplet chemotherapy and of EGFRi. Potential explanations include uncertainty about the significance of post hoc analyses for EGFRi and concerns regarding adverse events for both strategies.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Productos Biológicos / Neoplasias Colorrectales / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Bevacizumab Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: Intern Med J Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA INTERNA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Productos Biológicos / Neoplasias Colorrectales / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Bevacizumab Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: Intern Med J Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA INTERNA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia
...