Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Radiation oncology resident training in patient safety and quality improvement: a national survey of residency program directors.
Spraker, Matthew B; Nyflot, Matthew J; Hendrickson, Kristi R G; Terezakis, Stephanie; Fogh, Shannon E; Kane, Gabrielle M; Ford, Eric C; Zeng, Jing.
Afiliación
  • Spraker MB; Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, 4921 Parkview Place, CAM LL, CB 8224, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA. mspraker@wustl.edu.
  • Nyflot MJ; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Hendrickson KRG; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Terezakis S; Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Fogh SE; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Kane GM; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Ford EC; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Zeng J; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Radiat Oncol ; 13(1): 186, 2018 Sep 24.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30249302
BACKGROUND: Physicians and physicists are expected to contribute to patient safety and quality improvement (QI) in Radiation Oncology (RO), but prior studies suggest that training for this may be inadequate. RO and medical physics (MP) program directors (PDs) were surveyed to better understand the current patient safety/QI training in their residency programs. METHODS: PDs were surveyed via email in January 2017. Survey questions inquired about current training, curriculum elements, and barriers to development and/or improvement of safety and QI training. RESULTS: Eighty-nine RO PDs and 84 MP PDs were surveyed, and 21 RO PDs (28%) and 31 MP PDs (37%) responded. Both RO and MP PDs had favorable opinions of current safety and QI training, and used a range of resources for program development, especially safety and QI publications. Various curriculum elements were reported. Curriculum elements used by RO and MP PDs were similar, except RO were more likely than MP PDs to implement morbidity and mortality (M&M) conference (72% vs. 45%, p < 0.05). RO and MP PDs similarly cited various barriers, but RO PDs were more likely to cite lack of experience than MP PDs (40% vs. 16%, p < 0.05). PDs responded similarly independent of whether they reported using a departmental incident learning system (ILS) or not. CONCLUSIONS: PDs view patient safety/QI as an important part of resident education. Most PDs agreed that residents are adequately exposed to patient safety/QI and prepared to meet the patient safety/QI expectations of clinical practice. This conflicts with other independent studies that indicate a majority of residents feel their patient safety/QI training is inadequate and lacks formal exposure to QI tools.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Oncología por Radiación / Mejoramiento de la Calidad / Seguridad del Paciente / Física Sanitaria / Internado y Residencia Tipo de estudio: Evaluation_studies Aspecto: Implementation_research Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Radiat Oncol Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS / RADIOTERAPIA Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Oncología por Radiación / Mejoramiento de la Calidad / Seguridad del Paciente / Física Sanitaria / Internado y Residencia Tipo de estudio: Evaluation_studies Aspecto: Implementation_research Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Radiat Oncol Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS / RADIOTERAPIA Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos
...