Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Does it matter if it is appendix mucocele instead of appendicitis? Case series and brief review of literature.
Basak, Fatih; Hasbahceci, Mustafa; Yucel, Metin; Sisik, Abdullah; Acar, Aylin; Kilic, Ali; Su Dur, Meliha Seyma.
Afiliación
  • Basak F; Department of General Surgery, Health Science University, Umraniye Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Hasbahceci M; Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Yucel M; Department of General Surgery, Health Science University, Umraniye Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Sisik A; Department of General Surgery, Health Science University, Umraniye Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Acar A; Department of General Surgery, Health Science University, Umraniye Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Kilic A; Department of General Surgery, Health Science University, Umraniye Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Su Dur MS; Department of Radiology, Health Science University, Umraniye Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
J Cancer Res Ther ; 14(6): 1355-1360, 2018.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30488856
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

Appendiceal mucocele (AM) is a rare pathology, and its reported incidence is 0.3% in all appendectomy specimens. Here, we report a case series of AM and make a brief review of literature. SUBJECTS AND

METHODS:

We conducted a retrospective review of a prospectively collected data of patients who diagnosed as AM by histopathological evaluation between January 2009 and June 2015 were demographic data including age and gender, intraoperative findings, and histopathological reports were recorded. All cases were followed-up by routine examination and telephone interview. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED Definitive statistical methods (mean, standard deviation, median, frequency, and percentage) were used to evaluate the study data.

RESULTS:

Twelve patients were examined in the study with diagnose of AM. The mean age was 51.8 ± 18.6 years (26-83). Female-to-male ratio was 1.4 (7/5). Indications for surgery were acute abdomen in 8 (72.7%) patients with presumptive diagnosis of acute appendicitis and were AM in four patients diagnosed by imaging. Histopathological evaluation revealed mucinous cystadenoma in eight patients, simple retention cysts in three, and borderline mucinous tumor (pseudomyxoma peritonei) in one. The neuroendocrine tumor was obtained on the remaining portion of the appendix in one of the simple retention cysts patients. None of the patients died because of the AM with an average follow-up of 43 months (range 7-74).

CONCLUSIONS:

Surgical resection is the first choice therapy for AM. Precise treatment modality can remain unclear in some patients because of insufficient preoperative diagnosis. It is nonmalign AM mostly however having mucocele matters because of the significant association with synchronous tumors.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Apendicitis / Apéndice / Mucocele Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Cancer Res Ther Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS / TERAPEUTICA Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Turquía

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Apendicitis / Apéndice / Mucocele Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Cancer Res Ther Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS / TERAPEUTICA Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Turquía
...