[CT-guidance interstitial Iodine-125 seed brachytherapy as a salvage therapy for recurrent head and neck carcinoma].

ABSTRACT

Objective: To investigate the efficacy of CT-guidance interstitial Iodine-125 seed brachytherapy as a salvage therapy for recurrent head and neck carcinoma. Methods: A total of 122 patients who had been treated for recurrent head and neck carcinoma with CT-guided Iodine-125 seed permanent implantation were conducted a retrospective analysis at Peking University Third Hospital from February 2003 to December 2015. The study included 78 male and 44 female patients. Of the 122 patients, 76 had undergone radical surgery, 106 had received EBRT. Among the patients who underwent EBRT, the total dose delivered to PTV ranged from 30 to 140 Gy (median, 68.4 Gy). The actuarial median number of the implanted Iodine-125 seeds was 38 (range, 5-158). The specific activity of Iodine-125 seeds ranged from 14.8 to 28.9 MBq/seed (median, 22.2 MBq). The evaluation of post plan showed the actuarial D90 ranged from 46 to 282 Gy (median, 121 Gy). The overall local control and survival times were determined by using the Kaplan-Meier method from SPSS 13.0.Univariate analysis was performed on the local control rate and overall survival rate. Results: Tumor responses rate was 75.4%. The median local control time was 10.0 months (95% CI 9.8-24.2 months), and the 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year local control were 41.9%, 21.2%, 3.7%, and 3.7%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that the local control in D90≥120 Gy group had an increasing tendency, but no statistical difference were found. The effect of local control in the squamous cell carcinoma group was slightly worse than that in the non-squamous cell carcinoma group (P=0.032). Multi-factor analysis showed that the effect of local control in the squamous cell carcinoma group was slightly poor (P=0.03). The median survival time was 14 months (95% CI 14.4-35.8 months), and the 1-, 2-, 3- and 5-year survival rate were 51.5%, 34.2%, 19.4%, and 19.4%, respectively. The three factors, such as the tumor responses, KPS status before the seed implantation, and the D90 after the seed implantation, had a tendency to improve the total survival, but there was still no statistical differences. Multivariate analysis showed no clear influence factors. Conclusions: Interstitial permanent Iodine-125 seed implantation is an effective salvage re-irradiation modality for recurrent head and neck carcinoma after previous surgery and/or EBRT. CT image-guided method could yield the reliable seeds configuration and accurate dose distribution.