Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of different soft tissue-simulating materials in pixel intensity values in cone beam computed tomography.
Santaella, Gustavo Machado; Visconti, Maria Augusta Portella Guedes; Devito, Karina Lopes; Groppo, Francisco Carlos; Haiter-Neto, Francisco; Asprino, Luciana.
Afiliación
  • Santaella GM; Department of Oral Diagnosis, Division of Oral Radiology, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil. Electronic address: gustavoms@live.com.
  • Visconti MAPG; Department of Pathology and Oral Diagnosis, Dental School, Rio de Janeiro Federal University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Devito KL; Departament of Dental Clinic, Division of Oral Radiology, Dental School, Juiz de Fora Federal University, Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
  • Groppo FC; Department of Physiological Sciences, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil.
  • Haiter-Neto F; Department of Oral Diagnosis, Division of Oral Radiology, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Asprino L; Department of Oral Diagnosis, Division of Oral Surgery, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol ; 127(4): e102-e107, 2019 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30685389
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate different materials as soft tissue simulators and the influence of soft tissues in cone beam computed tomography. STUDY DESIGN: Images of 5 piglet heads were acquired with intact soft tissues, with the tissues stripped, and with the use of different soft tissue simulators, following the same acquisition protocol. Four different materials were tested, individually or in combination: acrylic, water, utility wax, and expanded polystyrene (EPS). Pixel intensity values of 8 quadrangular regions, that is, upper and lower teeth and alveolar bone, were obtained. The mean values were used for comparison by analysis of variance (ANOVA; α = 5%). RESULTS: No differences were observed for the "No Material," "EPS," "Acrylic," and "EPS and Wax" groups for the lower anterior and posterior teeth, the upper posterior tooth, and the anterior and posterior bone, and for the "No Material," "EPS," and "EPS and Wax," groups for the lower posterior bone. All groups showed statistical differences for the lower anterior bone and the upper anterior tooth. CONCLUSIONS: Expanded 2-cm thick polystyrene, with or without 1-cm thick utility wax, was effective for most regions, followed by acrylic 0.5 cm. Soft tissues were not of great influence in most regions. Water was not an effective material for any of the regions.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico / Proceso Alveolar Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico / Proceso Alveolar Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article
...