Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The epidemiology and management of clusters of invasive meningococcal disease in England, 2010-15.
Gobin, Maya; Hughes, Gareth; Foulkes, Sarah; Bagnall, Helen; Trindall, Amy; Decraene, Valérie; Edeghere, Obaghe; Balasegaram, Sooria; Cummins, Amelia; Coole, Louise.
Afiliación
  • Gobin M; Field Service, National Infection Service, Public Health England, Bristol BS1 6EH, UK.
  • Hughes G; Field Service, National Infection Service, Public Health England, Leeds LS1 4PL, UK.
  • Foulkes S; Field Service, National Infection Service, Public Health England, Birmingham B3 2PW, UK.
  • Bagnall H; Field Service, National Infection Service, Public Health England, Birmingham B3 2PW, UK.
  • Trindall A; Field Service, National Infection Service, Public Health England, Cambridge CB2 0SR, UK.
  • Decraene V; Field Service, National Infection Service, Public Health England, Liverpool L3 1DS, UK.
  • Edeghere O; Field Service, National Infection Service, Public Health England, Birmingham B3 2PW, UK.
  • Balasegaram S; Field Service, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London SE1 6LH, UK.
  • Cummins A; Public Health England East of England, Cambridge CB21 5XA, UK.
  • Coole L; Field Service, National Infection Service, Public Health England, Leeds LS1 4PL, UK.
J Public Health (Oxf) ; 42(1): e58-e65, 2020 02 28.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30942387
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Guidance for public health management of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) in in England recommends the use of antibiotic chemoprophylaxis and vaccination. We summarized clinical and epidemiological data collected during routine management of IMD clusters in England.

METHODS:

Data on epidemiology and operational decisions for public health management were reviewed for clusters between April 2010 and December 2015.

RESULTS:

Clusters were generally 2-3 cases (53/58; 91%) within a single age band <18-years. Nurseries (n = 20, 34%), households/social networks (n = 14, 24%) and schools (n = 10, 17%) were the commonest settings. Chemoprophylaxis alone was used in 36 (58%) clusters, including most serogroup B clusters (31/41; 76%). Chemoprophylaxis and vaccination was used in a further 20 (32%) clusters. Vaccine was delivered promptly (<7 days). Four clusters had cases with onset post-chemoprophylaxis; no clusters recorded cases with onset post-vaccination. No pattern was observed between interventions and setting/population at risk, and interventions were consistent with national guidance. Challenges to management included logistical issues related to intervention delivery.

CONCLUSIONS:

Public health management of IMD clusters presents challenges in decision-making and implementation of interventions. Nonetheless, few cases were observed following intervention. Responses were consistent with national guidance. A systematic data collection tool should be developed to support future evaluation.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Contexto en salud: 1_ASSA2030 / 4_TD Problema de salud: 1_doencas_transmissiveis / 4_meningitis Asunto principal: Vacunas Meningococicas / Infecciones Meningocócicas Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Incidence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Adolescent / Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Public Health (Oxf) Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Contexto en salud: 1_ASSA2030 / 4_TD Problema de salud: 1_doencas_transmissiveis / 4_meningitis Asunto principal: Vacunas Meningococicas / Infecciones Meningocócicas Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Incidence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Adolescent / Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Public Health (Oxf) Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido
...